Volume 6, Issue 5, September 2018, Page: 148-155
Status of Soil Properties Under Canopy of Farmers’ Preferred Coffee Shade Tree Species, in Adola Rede District, Guji Zone, Southern Ethiopia
Aschalew Emire, Oromia Agricultural Research Institute, Bore Agricultural Research Center, Bore, Ethiopia
Zebene Asfaw, Hawassa University, Wondogenet College of Forestry and Natural Resources, Shashemane, Ethiopia
Received: Jun. 27, 2018;       Accepted: Sep. 10, 2018;       Published: Oct. 13, 2018
DOI: 10.11648/j.ajaf.20180605.15      View  216      Downloads  12
Abstract
The study was conducted at Adola Rede District, in Guji Zone, Southern Ethiopia. The aim of the study was to investigate farmers’ preference criteria of soil fertility improving shade tree species and to identify Status of soil properties under canopy of farmers’ preferred shade tree species. To address the objectives of this study, all necessary data were collected through key informant interview, questionnaire survey and soil sampling. A total of 20 key informants and 90 households were participated for household interview. Based on their selection criteria, sampled households have done preference ranking of shade tree species used for soil fertility enhancement. The results of this study showed that, farmers’ main selection criteria were based on decomposition rate of shade treelitter fall, soil moisture status under shade tree canopy, coffee yield increments and growth rate of coffee plants under shade tree canopy. Generally, the preference ranking of key informants and respondent households soil fertility improvingcoffee shade tree species were in the order of: Ficus sur>Cordia africana>Millettia ferruginea>Albizia gummifera> croton macrostachyus>Acacia abyssinica. From the identified soil fertility improving coffee shade treespecies, soil samples were taken from under canopy of Ficus sur with 1st rank and Cordia africana with 2nd rank farmers’ preferences. For soil analysis from under canopy of both coffee shade trees and from outside the tree canopy, a total of 48 soil samples were taken. The results of soil properties under canopy of both shade trees showed that SOC, total N, available P, exchangeable K, CEC and soil pH were significantly (P<0.05) higher than outside the tree canopy. The results of BD outside the tree canopy was significantly (P<0.05) higher than undercanopy of both coffee shade trees. However, soil textures under canopy of both coffee shade trees and outside the tree canopy was not significantly different. Based on the finding of this study, statusof soil fertility under canopy of Ficus sur was significantly (P<0.05) higher than Cordia africana. Thus, the soil laboratory analyzed results of soil physico-chemical properties are in agreement with farmers’ rank of coffee shade tree preferences. Therefore, the findings suggest that if knowledge of local farmers is recorded and effectively used with scientific findings, it can provide valuable information. Moreover, for soil fertility enhancement and increments of coffee production incorporation of the two shade trees incoffee farms of similar agro-ecological conditions is paramount.
Keywords
Coffee Growers, Coffee Shade Tree Species, Soil Fertility Improving, Cordia africana, Ficus sur
To cite this article
Aschalew Emire, Zebene Asfaw, Status of Soil Properties Under Canopy of Farmers’ Preferred Coffee Shade Tree Species, in Adola Rede District, Guji Zone, Southern Ethiopia, American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry. Vol. 6, No. 5, 2018, pp. 148-155. doi: 10.11648/j.ajaf.20180605.15
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Reference
[1]
Ogunkunle, C., Awotoye, O. 2010. Soil Fertility Status under Different Tree Cropping System in a Southwestern Zone of Nigeria NotulaeScientiaBiologicaeAvaliable at: www.notulaebiologicae.ro. Retrieved on August, 2011.
[2]
Ranieri, S., Stirzaker, R., Suprayogo, D., Purwanto, E., Willigen, P., and Noordwijk, M. 2004. Managing movements of water, solutes and soil: from plot to landscape scale. Below-ground Interactions in Tropical Agroecosystems.
[3]
Christina, L. and Polzot, R. 2004. Carbon Storage in Coffee Agroecosystems of Southern Costa Rica: Potential Applications for the Clean Development Mechanism.
[4]
Iben, N., Soren, L. and Theilade I. 2007. The Importance of Local Knowledge and Inter disciplinary Research. People, Trees and Agriculture in Africa: Constraints and Options for Improved Management of Trees in Tanzania and Burkina Faso. Journal of Transdisciplinary Environmental Studies, vol. 6, no. 1.
[5]
Allen, S. C. 2004. Safety-net role of tree roots: evidence from a pecan (Caryaillinoensis K. Koch)–cotton (Gossypiumhirsutum L.) alley cropping system in the southern United States. Journal of Forest Ecology and Management, Vol 192, pp 395-407.
[6]
Blair, J. M., Parmelee, R. W. and Beare, M. H. 1990. Decay-rates, nitrogen fluxes, and decomposer communities of single-species and mixed-species foliar litter. Journal of Ecology, 71, 1976–1985.
[7]
Haggar, J., Tanner, E., Beer, J., and Kass, D. 1993. Nitrogen dynamics of tropical agroforestry and annual cropping systems. Journal of Soil Biology and Biochemical, Vol. 25, pp 1363-1378.
[8]
Beer, J., Muschler, R., Kass, D. and Somarriba, E. 1998. Shade management in coffee and cacao plantations. Journal of Agroforestry Systems, Vol 38, pp 139-164.
[9]
Yazachew, E. and Kasahun, D. 2011. The National regional government of Oromia, Physical and socio economic profile of Guji zone districts’.
[10]
Central Statistics Agency (CSA). 2008. Summary and Statistical Report of the 2007 Population and Housing Census. Population size by age and sex. Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia Population Census Commission, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
[11]
Abebe, Y., Fisseha, I. and Olsson, M. 2009. Scattered trees as modifiers of agricultural landscapes: the role of Waddeessa (Cordiaafricana Lam.) trees in Bako area, Oromia, Ethiopia. Afr. J. Eco. (47-suppl. 1), 78-83.
[12]
Zebene, A. 2008. Growth of Millettiaferruginia and its impact on soil properties of three Coffee plantations of southern Ethiopia. Ethiopian Journal of Natural Resources, Vol. 10 (2): 147-16.
[13]
Zebene, A. and Agren. G. 2007. Farmers’ local knowledge and top soil properties of agroforestry practices in Sidama, southern Ethiopia. Journal of Agroforest system, Vol. 71: 35-48.
[14]
Agena, A, Tilahun, F. and Bekele, L. 2014. Effects of three tree species on microclimate and soil amelioration in the central rift valley of Ethiopia, Journal of Soil science and Environmental Management, Vol. 5 (5), PP. 62-71.
[15]
Belay, M., Tesfaye, A. and Abdu, A. 2014. Effects of scattered F. albida (Del) and C. macrostachyus (Lam) tree species on key soil physicochemical properties and grain yield of Maize (Zea Mays): a case study at UmbuloWacho watershed, southern Ethiopia. Wudpecker Journal of Agricultural Research, Vol. 3 (3), pp. 063 – 07.
[16]
Abebe, N. 2006. Soil Fertility Status under Indigenous Tree Canopies on Farm land in Selected Areas of Eastern and Western Haragehe Zone. M.Sc. Thesis. Haramaya University, Haramaya.
[17]
Aweto, A. O. and Dikinya, O. 2003. The beneficial effects of two tree species on soil properties in a semi-arid savanna range land in Botswana. Journal of Land Contamination and Reclamation, Vol 11 (3), pp 339-334.
[18]
Jiregna, G., Andrey, R. and Legesse, N. 2005. Trees on farms and their contribution to soil fertility parameters in Badessa, Eastern Ethiopia, Journal of BiolFertil Soils, Vol. 42, pp 66–71.
[19]
Kahi, C. H., Ngugi, R. K., Mureithi, S. M. and Ng’ethe, J. C. 2009. The canopy effects of Prosopisjuliflora (DC.) and Acacia tortilis (HAYNE) trees on herbaceous plant species and soil physico- chemical properties in Njemps flats, Kenya. Journal of Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems, Vol. 10, PP. 441-449.
[20]
Pam, H. and Brian, M. 2007. Interpretation of soil test results, Csiro Publishing, Australia.
[21]
Daniel, H. 2011. Evaluation on the biomass production and fodder quality of Ficusthonningii (BLUME) and its effects on soil physico-chemical properties, in Alferom District, Tigray, Ethiopia, MSc Thesis, Wondo Genet College of Forestry and Natural resources, Hawassa University.
[22]
Enideg, D. 2008. Importance of FicusthonningiiBlume in Soil Fertility improvement and animal nutrition in Gondar Zuria, Ethiopia, M.Sc. Thesis, University of NaturalResources and Applied Life Science, Vienna.
[23]
Bruce, R. C. and Rayment, G. E. 1982. Analytical methods and interpretations used by the Agricultural Chemistry Branch for Soil and Land Use Surveys.
[24]
Jeddi, K., Cortina, J. and Chaieb, M. 2013. Acacia salicina, Pinushalepensis and Eucalyptus occidentalis improve soil surface conditions in arid southern Tunisia, Journal of Arid Environments, 73 (2009) 1005–1013.
[25]
Yeshanew, A., Mats, O. and Tekalign, M. 1998. Contribution of Croton macrostachys to Soil Fertility in Maize–Based Subsistence Agriculture of Bure Area, North Western Ethiopia. Proc. 6th ESA maize conference. pp 232-234.
Browse journals by subject