Volume 8, Issue 3, May 2020, Page: 64-68
Equation Chapter 1 Section 1 Corn Suitability Rating for Southern Highland Zone of Tanzania - A Feasibility Assessment at the TARI-Uyole, Mbeya, Tanzania
Johnson Godlove Mtama, Tanzania Agricultural Research Institute, Department of Natural Resources, Mbeya, Tanzania
Charles Lee Burras, Department of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, USA
Balthazar Michael Msanya, Sokoine University of Agriculture, College of Agriculture, Department of Soil and Geological Sciences, Morogoro, Tanzania
Received: Nov. 25, 2019;       Accepted: Dec. 23, 2019;       Published: Jun. 4, 2020
DOI: 10.11648/j.ajaf.20200803.12      View  68      Downloads  48
Abstract
Corn productivity indices (CSR2T) for representative soils in the Southern Highland Zone of Tanzania were developed. The approaches used were derived from Iowa State University’s CSR2. Consistent with ISU, index points were applied to the pedon based on the USDA Soil Taxonomy subgroup, family particle size class, and available water holding capacity, solum depth and resilience to degradation characterizations. Additional index points were applied based on field conditions especially slope, erosion history and flooding or ponding risk in order to determine the inherent productivity potential of the soils in the work sites. The results were used to develop the Corn Suitability Rating in Tanzania (CSR2T) for the soil settings of Southern Highlands. Sites’ characterization results were linked with the maize field experimental results from 2003 to 2016 to determine the inherent corn productivity indices for the sites. The soils were found to have CSR2T values of 72, 56, 62 and 48 for Uyole, Mbimba, Inyala and Seatondale farms, respectively. The soils of Seatondale were observed to be more limited by water holding capacity. However, generally the study soils are observed to have good pedogenic potential for corn productivity and very minimal pedogenic limitations for corn productivity. The most serious limitation seems to be low water holding capacity.
Keywords
Corn, Suitability, Taxonomy, Pedon
To cite this article
Johnson Godlove Mtama, Charles Lee Burras, Balthazar Michael Msanya, Equation Chapter 1 Section 1 Corn Suitability Rating for Southern Highland Zone of Tanzania - A Feasibility Assessment at the TARI-Uyole, Mbeya, Tanzania, American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry. Vol. 8, No. 3, 2020, pp. 64-68. doi: 10.11648/j.ajaf.20200803.12
Copyright
Copyright © 2020 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Reference
[1]
H. G. Halcrow, and H. R. Stucky. “Procedure for land reclassification in Montana”. Montana Agriculture Experiment Station Bulletin 459: 39, 1949.
[2]
B. B. Johnson and T. Rosener. “Nebraska’s virtual corn suitability rating”. Cornhusker Economics. Paper 455. Univ. Nebraska, Lincoln. 2010.
[3]
J. Mitchell. “Productivity ratings and their importance in the soil survey report”. Transactions of the 4th International Congress of Soil Science 1: 356-360, 1950.
[4]
R. E Storie. “An index for rating the agricultural values of soils”. Bulletin 556, California Agricultural Experiment Station, Berkeley, CA. 1932.
[5]
R. H. Rust, and L. D. Hanson. “Crop equivalent rating guide for soils of Minnesota”. University of Minnesota Agriculture Experiment Station Miscellaneous Report 32-1975. 1975.
[6]
O’Green, A. T., S. B. Southard, and R. J. Southard. “A revised Storie Index for use with digital soils information”. University of California Agricultural and Natural Resources Publication 8335: 2-11. Oakland, CA. 2008.
[7]
W. H. Scholtes and F. F. Riecken. “Use of soil survey information for tax assessment in Taylor County, Iowa”. Soil Science Society Proceedings 16: 270-273. 1952.
[8]
R. E. Storie. “Storie index soil rating”. Oakland: University of California Division of Agricultural Sciences Special Publication 3203. 1978.
[9]
T. E. Fenton, E. R. Duncan, W. D. Shrader, and L. C. Dumenil. “Productivity levels of some Iowa soils”. Special Report No. 66. Iowa Agriculture Experiment Station, Ames, 1971.
[10]
J. K. Ableiter, “Productivity ratings in the soil survey report,” Soil Science Society of America Journal, vol. 2: 415-422, 1938.
[11]
K. P. Woli, C. L. Burras, L. J. Abendroth, and R. W. Elmore. “Optimizing corn seeding rates using a field’s corn suitability rating”. Agronomy Journal 106: 1523-1532. 2014.
[12]
C. L. Burras, G. A. Miller, T. E. Fenton, and A. M. Sassman. “Corn suitability rating 2 (CSR2) equation and component values,” http://www.extension.iastate.edu/soils/suitabilities-interpretations, 2015 (retrieved June 18, 2015).
[13]
S. Butzen. “Best management practices for corn after corn,” Crop Insights 22 (6): 1-5, 2003.
[14]
E. M. Craft, R. M. Cruse, and G. A Miller, “Soil erosion effects on corn yields assessed by potential yield index model”, Soil Science Society of America Journal 56: 878-883, 1992.
[15]
R. Lal. “Global soil erosion by water and carbon dynamics”. In R. Lal, J. Kimble, E. Levine and B. A. Stewart (Eds.) Soils and Global Change. Advances in Soil Science, CRC Press, Baco Raton, FL. 1995.
[16]
G. Cucci, G. Lacolla, M. Pagliai, and N. Vignozzi, “Effect of reclamation on the structure of silty-clay soils irrigated with saline-sodic waters”, International Agrophysics 29: 23-30, 2015.
[17]
M. Stinn, and M. Duffy. “What is the Precision of Land Survey Values? “ Choices – The Magazine of Food, Farm and Resources Issues 27 (3): 1-4. 1999.
[18]
M. Duffy. “Value of soil erosion to the land owner”. Agr Decision Maker, File A1-75 Iowa State University, Department of Economics Extension and Outreach. Available at: https://www.extension.iastate.edu/agdm/crops/html/a1-75.html, 2012 (retrieved November 27, 2015).
[19]
L. D. Hopkins. “Methods for generating land suitability maps: a comparative evaluation”. American Institute of Planners 43: 386-400, 1977.
[20]
L. D. Hopkins. “Land suitability analysis: Methods and interpretation”. Landscape Research 5: 8-9, 1979.
[21]
S. K. Singh, V. Hoyos-Villegas, J. H. Houx, and F. B. Fritschi. “Influence of artificially restricted rooting depth on soybean yield and seed quality”. Agricultural Water Management 105: 38-47. 2012.
[22]
R. Lal. “Erosion-crop productivity relationships for soils of Africa”. Soil Science Society of America Journal 59: 661-667, 1995.
[23]
E. P. Ukaegbu, and C. L. A. Asadu. “Suitability rating of soils of Owerri agricultural zone, Nigeria, for rainfed monocropping of maize”. Journal of Agricultural, Biotechnology and Ecology 5: 55-66. 2012.
[24]
D. Pimentel. “Soil erosion: A food and environmental threat”. Environment, Development and Sustainability 8: 119–137. 2006.
[25]
J. A. Phillips. “Use of soil surveys in land valuation for tax assessment”. Iowa State University. Iowa State Digital Repository Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. Paper 3259 (Available at: http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4258&context=rtd,reviewed November 27, 2015). 1968.
[26]
M. A. Haddad, P. F. Anderson, S. Thol, C. Hertel, and B. Schmidt. “Assessing the future of the bioeconomy in Greene county Iowa”. Rural and Community Development 4: 15-33, 2009.
[27]
N. Tremblay, Y. M. Bouroubi, C. Bélec, R. W. Mullen, N. R. Kitchen, W. E. Thomason, and I. Ortiz-Monasterio. “Corn response to nitrogen is influenced by soil texture and weather”. Agronomy Journal 104: 1658-1671. 2012.
[28]
B., A Sánchez. Rasmussen, and J. R. Porter. “Temperatures and the growth and development of maize and rice: a review”. Global Change Biology 20: 408-417. 2014.
[29]
M. J. T Norman, C. J. Pearson, and P. G. E. Searle. “The ecology of tropical food crops”. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. pp. 369. 1984.
[30]
A. M Sassman, G. A. Miller, and C. L. Burras. “Iowa Soil Properties and Interpretations Database (ISPAID) 8.1”. Iowa State University Soils and Land Use (http://www.extension.iastate.edu/soils/ispaid) Reviewed June 17, 2015.
Browse journals by subject