Evaluation of Some Biopesticidal Formulations Against Teak (<i>Tectona grandis</i> Linn. f.) Skeletonizer, <i>Eutectona machaeralis</i> Walker (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in India

Nitin Kulkarni; Sanjay Dattatray Paunikar

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ajaf.20170501.12

| Peer-Reviewed

Evaluation of Some Biopesticidal Formulations Against Teak (Tectona grandis Linn. f.) Skeletonizer, Eutectona machaeralis Walker (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in India

Nitin Kulkarni, Sanjay Dattatray Paunikar

Published in American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry (Volume 5, Issue 1)

Received: 17 February 2017 Accepted: 25 February 2017 Published: 14 March 2017

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

Efficacy of five commercial modern biopesticidal formulations was evaluated against the penultimate instar larvae of E. machaeralis in field-cum-lab experiments. These were; plant derived product (Ozomite® @ 0.0025% to 0.02%), Beauveria bassiana with combinations of other entomopathogenic fungi (Bioseal plus® @ 0.05% to 0.30%, i.e., 5x10⁵ to 3.0x10⁶ spores/ ml) and Metarhizium anisopliae with combinations of other entomopathogenic fungi (Biomet plus® @ 0.05% to 0.30%, i.e., 5x10⁵ to 3.0x10⁶ spores / ml), Actinomycete product (Spinosad) 45%EC (Conserve® @ 0.005% to 0.10%), botanicals with Bacillus thuringiensis (AgropestBt® @ 0.01% to 0.05%) apart from water spray as control. The plant derived commercial formulation (Ozomite®) (with 94.44% mortality at 0.01%), Actinomycete product (Conserve®) (with 100% mortality at 0.05%) and botanicals with Bt (AgropestBt®) (with 77.78% mortality at 0.05%) proved promising against the Eutectona machaeralis larvae. The plant derived commercial formulation (Ozomite®) was the most effective, followed by Actinomycete product (Conserve).

Published in	American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry (Volume 5, Issue 1)
DOI	10.11648/j.ajaf.20170501.12
Page(s)	12-15
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2017. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Biocontrol, Biological Control, Bioefficacy, Biopesticides, Botanical Formulations, Forest Insect Pests, IPM, Teak

References

[1]	Dhaliwal, G. S., Koul, O. (2007). Biopesticide and Pest Management: Conventional and Biotechnological Approaches, Kalyani Publishers, New Delhi. 455p.
[2]	Beeson, C. F. C. (1941). The Ecology and control of the Forest Insects of India and Neighbouring Countries. Vasant Press, Dehra Dun. 1007p.
[3]	Kulkarni, N. (2014). Status of potential of biocontrol component for integrated management of forest insect pests in India. In: Biopesticides in Sustainable Agriculture (Eds.: O. Koul, G. S. Dhaliwal, S. Khokar and R. Singh); Progress and Potential, Science Publisher, New Delhi (India). pp. 389-419.
[4]	Sambaraju, K., DesRochers, P., Rioux, D., Boulanger, Y., Kulkarni, N., Verma, R. K., Pautasso, M., Pureswaran, D., Martel, V., Hebert, C., Cusson, M. and Delisle, J. (2016). Forest ecosystem health and biotic disturbances: perspectives on indicators and management approaches. Pp.460-502. In: Ecological Forest Management Handbook (Ed. Larocque, G. R.), CRC Press, Boca Raton, 589p.
[5]	Nair, K. S. S., Sudheendrakumar, V. V., Varma, R. V., Chako, K. C. and Jayaraman, K. (1996). Effect of defoliation by Hyblaea puera and Eutectona machaeralis (Lepidoptera) on volume increment of teak. Proc. IUFRO Symp. On Impact of Diseases and Insect Pests in Tropical Forests, 1996, Pp. 257-273.
[6]	Joshi, K. C., Roychoudhury, N. and Sharma, N. (2001). Microbial pesticides for forest insect control. pp. 61-84. In Shukla, P. K. and Joshi, K. C. (Eds.) Recent Trends in Insect Pest Control to Enhance Forest Productivity, Proceedings of a Workshop on Entomology and Biological Control, Sept. 25th, 2000, Tropical Forest Research Institute, Jabalpur.
[7]	Kulkarni, N. (2001). Antis-insect bioactivities of some botanicals: their prospects as component of integrated pest control system. In: Shukla, P. K. and Joshi, K. C. (Eds.) Recent Trends in Insect Pest Control to Enhance Forest Productivity, Tropical Forest Research Institute, Jabalpur, pp. 95-137.
[8]	Kulkarni, N., Joshi, K. C. and Shukla, P. K. (2004). Integrated Insect Pest Management of forest insect pests. pp. 370-410. In: Gujar, G. T. (Ed.) Contemporary Trends in Insect Science Campus Books, New Delhi, 424p.
[9]	Kulkarni N., Paunikar, S., Joshi K. C., Kakkar, A., V. Mishra and V. L. Maheshwari (2009). Antifeedant activity of Annona squamosa against teak (Tectona grandis Linn. f) skeletonizer, Eutectona macheralis Walker (Lepidoptera: Pyraldiae). In: Ecofriendly Insect Management. Pp. 194-199. (Eds. Ignacimuthus, S. and David, B. V.), Elite Publishing House, Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi.
[10]	Kulkarni, N., Paunikar, S. and Hussaini, S. S. (2011). Susceptibility of teak skeletonizer, Eutectona machaeralis (Walker) to the EPN, Heterorhabditis indica Poinar. World Journal of Zoology 6(1): 33-39.
[11]	Abbott, W. S. (1925). A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. J. Econ. Entomol 18: 265-267.
[12]	Gomez, K. A. and Gomez, A. A. (1984). Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research (2nd ed.), A Wiley-Interscience Publication, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 680pp.
[13]	Kulkarni, N., Joshi, K. C. and Meshram, P. B. (1996). Bioactivity of methanolicneem seed extract against the teak leaf skeletonizer, Eutectona machaeralis Walk. (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Journal of Environmental Biology, 17(3): 189-195.
[14]	Kulkarni, N., Joshi, K. C. and Gupta, B. N. (1997). Antifeedant property of Lantana camara var. aculeate and Aloe vera leaves against teak skeletonizer, Eutectona machaeralis Walk. (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Entomon, 22(1): 61- 65.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Nitin Kulkarni, Sanjay Dattatray Paunikar. (2017). Evaluation of Some Biopesticidal Formulations Against Teak (Tectona grandis Linn. f.) Skeletonizer, Eutectona machaeralis Walker (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in India. American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 5(1), 12-15. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20170501.12

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Nitin Kulkarni; Sanjay Dattatray Paunikar. Evaluation of Some Biopesticidal Formulations Against Teak (Tectona grandis Linn. f.) Skeletonizer, Eutectona machaeralis Walker (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in India. Am. J. Agric. For. 2017, 5(1), 12-15. doi: 10.11648/j.ajaf.20170501.12

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Nitin Kulkarni, Sanjay Dattatray Paunikar. Evaluation of Some Biopesticidal Formulations Against Teak (Tectona grandis Linn. f.) Skeletonizer, Eutectona machaeralis Walker (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in India. Am J Agric For. 2017;5(1):12-15. doi: 10.11648/j.ajaf.20170501.12

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ajaf.20170501.12,
  author = {Nitin Kulkarni and Sanjay Dattatray Paunikar},
  title = {Evaluation of Some Biopesticidal Formulations Against Teak (Tectona grandis Linn. f.) Skeletonizer, Eutectona machaeralis Walker (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in India},
  journal = {American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry},
  volume = {5},
  number = {1},
  pages = {12-15},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ajaf.20170501.12},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20170501.12},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajaf.20170501.12},
  abstract = {Efficacy of five commercial modern biopesticidal formulations was evaluated against the penultimate instar larvae of E. machaeralis in field-cum-lab experiments. These were; plant derived product (Ozomite® @ 0.0025% to 0.02%), Beauveria bassiana with combinations of other entomopathogenic fungi (Bioseal plus® @ 0.05% to 0.30%, i.e., 5x105 to 3.0x106 spores/ ml) and Metarhizium anisopliae with combinations of other entomopathogenic fungi (Biomet plus® @ 0.05% to 0.30%, i.e., 5x105 to 3.0x106 spores / ml), Actinomycete product (Spinosad) 45%EC (Conserve® @ 0.005% to 0.10%), botanicals with Bacillus thuringiensis (AgropestBt® @ 0.01% to 0.05%) apart from water spray as control. The plant derived commercial formulation (Ozomite®) (with 94.44% mortality at 0.01%), Actinomycete product (Conserve®) (with 100% mortality at 0.05%) and botanicals with Bt (AgropestBt®) (with 77.78% mortality at 0.05%) proved promising against the Eutectona machaeralis larvae. The plant derived commercial formulation (Ozomite®) was the most effective, followed by Actinomycete product (Conserve).},
 year = {2017}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Evaluation of Some Biopesticidal Formulations Against Teak (Tectona grandis Linn. f.) Skeletonizer, Eutectona machaeralis Walker (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in India
AU  - Nitin Kulkarni
AU  - Sanjay Dattatray Paunikar
Y1  - 2017/03/14
PY  - 2017
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20170501.12
DO  - 10.11648/j.ajaf.20170501.12
T2  - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry
JF  - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry
JO  - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry
SP  - 12
EP  - 15
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2330-8591
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20170501.12
AB  - Efficacy of five commercial modern biopesticidal formulations was evaluated against the penultimate instar larvae of E. machaeralis in field-cum-lab experiments. These were; plant derived product (Ozomite® @ 0.0025% to 0.02%), Beauveria bassiana with combinations of other entomopathogenic fungi (Bioseal plus® @ 0.05% to 0.30%, i.e., 5x105 to 3.0x106 spores/ ml) and Metarhizium anisopliae with combinations of other entomopathogenic fungi (Biomet plus® @ 0.05% to 0.30%, i.e., 5x105 to 3.0x106 spores / ml), Actinomycete product (Spinosad) 45%EC (Conserve® @ 0.005% to 0.10%), botanicals with Bacillus thuringiensis (AgropestBt® @ 0.01% to 0.05%) apart from water spray as control. The plant derived commercial formulation (Ozomite®) (with 94.44% mortality at 0.01%), Actinomycete product (Conserve®) (with 100% mortality at 0.05%) and botanicals with Bt (AgropestBt®) (with 77.78% mortality at 0.05%) proved promising against the Eutectona machaeralis larvae. The plant derived commercial formulation (Ozomite®) was the most effective, followed by Actinomycete product (Conserve).
VL  - 5
IS  - 1
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Nitin Kulkarni

Forest Entomology Division, Tropical Forest Research Institute, Jabalpur (M. P.), India
Sanjay Dattatray Paunikar

Forest Entomology Division, Tropical Forest Research Institute, Jabalpur (M. P.), India

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Nitin Kulkarni, Sanjay Dattatray Paunikar. (2017). Evaluation of Some Biopesticidal Formulations Against Teak (Tectona grandis Linn. f.) Skeletonizer, Eutectona machaeralis Walker (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in India. American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 5(1), 12-15. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20170501.12

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Nitin Kulkarni; Sanjay Dattatray Paunikar. Evaluation of Some Biopesticidal Formulations Against Teak (Tectona grandis Linn. f.) Skeletonizer, Eutectona machaeralis Walker (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in India. Am. J. Agric. For. 2017, 5(1), 12-15. doi: 10.11648/j.ajaf.20170501.12

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Nitin Kulkarni, Sanjay Dattatray Paunikar. Evaluation of Some Biopesticidal Formulations Against Teak (Tectona grandis Linn. f.) Skeletonizer, Eutectona machaeralis Walker (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in India. Am J Agric For. 2017;5(1):12-15. doi: 10.11648/j.ajaf.20170501.12

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ajaf.20170501.12,
  author = {Nitin Kulkarni and Sanjay Dattatray Paunikar},
  title = {Evaluation of Some Biopesticidal Formulations Against Teak (Tectona grandis Linn. f.) Skeletonizer, Eutectona machaeralis Walker (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in India},
  journal = {American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry},
  volume = {5},
  number = {1},
  pages = {12-15},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ajaf.20170501.12},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20170501.12},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajaf.20170501.12},
  abstract = {Efficacy of five commercial modern biopesticidal formulations was evaluated against the penultimate instar larvae of E. machaeralis in field-cum-lab experiments. These were; plant derived product (Ozomite® @ 0.0025% to 0.02%), Beauveria bassiana with combinations of other entomopathogenic fungi (Bioseal plus® @ 0.05% to 0.30%, i.e., 5x105 to 3.0x106 spores/ ml) and Metarhizium anisopliae with combinations of other entomopathogenic fungi (Biomet plus® @ 0.05% to 0.30%, i.e., 5x105 to 3.0x106 spores / ml), Actinomycete product (Spinosad) 45%EC (Conserve® @ 0.005% to 0.10%), botanicals with Bacillus thuringiensis (AgropestBt® @ 0.01% to 0.05%) apart from water spray as control. The plant derived commercial formulation (Ozomite®) (with 94.44% mortality at 0.01%), Actinomycete product (Conserve®) (with 100% mortality at 0.05%) and botanicals with Bt (AgropestBt®) (with 77.78% mortality at 0.05%) proved promising against the Eutectona machaeralis larvae. The plant derived commercial formulation (Ozomite®) was the most effective, followed by Actinomycete product (Conserve).},
 year = {2017}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Evaluation of Some Biopesticidal Formulations Against Teak (Tectona grandis Linn. f.) Skeletonizer, Eutectona machaeralis Walker (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in India
AU  - Nitin Kulkarni
AU  - Sanjay Dattatray Paunikar
Y1  - 2017/03/14
PY  - 2017
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20170501.12
DO  - 10.11648/j.ajaf.20170501.12
T2  - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry
JF  - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry
JO  - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry
SP  - 12
EP  - 15
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2330-8591
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20170501.12
AB  - Efficacy of five commercial modern biopesticidal formulations was evaluated against the penultimate instar larvae of E. machaeralis in field-cum-lab experiments. These were; plant derived product (Ozomite® @ 0.0025% to 0.02%), Beauveria bassiana with combinations of other entomopathogenic fungi (Bioseal plus® @ 0.05% to 0.30%, i.e., 5x105 to 3.0x106 spores/ ml) and Metarhizium anisopliae with combinations of other entomopathogenic fungi (Biomet plus® @ 0.05% to 0.30%, i.e., 5x105 to 3.0x106 spores / ml), Actinomycete product (Spinosad) 45%EC (Conserve® @ 0.005% to 0.10%), botanicals with Bacillus thuringiensis (AgropestBt® @ 0.01% to 0.05%) apart from water spray as control. The plant derived commercial formulation (Ozomite®) (with 94.44% mortality at 0.01%), Actinomycete product (Conserve®) (with 100% mortality at 0.05%) and botanicals with Bt (AgropestBt®) (with 77.78% mortality at 0.05%) proved promising against the Eutectona machaeralis larvae. The plant derived commercial formulation (Ozomite®) was the most effective, followed by Actinomycete product (Conserve).
VL  - 5
IS  - 1
ER  -

Copy | Download