To scientifically solve the taxonomical confusion of Yulania sprengeri (Pamp.) D. L. Fu in the world, the chloroplast genomic sequences of four confusable species were assembled and compared with the other species of Yulania Spach by means of the typical algorithm. The results indicated that the evolutionary system of Yulania Spach includes four natural sections: Y. sect. Yulania, Y. sect. Buergeria (Sieb. & Zucc.) D. L. Fu, Y. sect. Rosula D. L. Fu, sect., nov., and Y. sect. Tulipastrum (Spach) D. L. Fu, which all have the same boundaries: PHS (17bp) = 0.96. The species Y. sprengeri (Pamp.) D. L. Fu belong to sect. Yulania, but several confusable species such as Y. diva (Stapf. ex Dandy) D. L. Fu, sp. transl. nov., Y. urceolata D. L. Fu, B. H. Xiong et X. Chen, sp. segregat. nov., Y. pendula D. L. Fu, sp. nov. and Y. viridula D. L. Fu, T. B. Zhao et G. H. Tian belong to the new section Rosula D. L. Fu. According to International Code of Botanical Nomenclature, Y. sprengeri (Pamp.) D. L. Fu is proposed for conservation and emended with the conserved type (D. L. Fu 2017100803, CAF). The misidentified epitype of Magnolia sprengeri, the illustration in Flora of Trees of China, differing taxonomically, selected as Lectotype, with almost equal specimen, paratype (D. L. Fu 2017093001, CAF) from Weining County, Guizhou province of China, was segregated as a new species, Y. urceolata D. L. Fu, B. H. Xiong et X. Chen. The other new confusable species, Y. pendula D. L. Fu, is described and illustrated based on the holotype (D. L. Fu 2012040201, CAF) from Sichuan province of China, which was once misidentified as Y. biondii (Pamp.) D. L. Fu or Y. sprengeri (Pamp.) D. L. Fu. The typci-evolutionary characters including diagnostic differences and particularity of the new section and two new species, are given respectively. The evolutionary system scientifically overcomes the partiality and subjectivity of past taxonomical systems of Yulania Spach of Magnoliaceae Juss.
Published in |
American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry (Volume 7, Issue 5)
This article belongs to the Special Issue The New Evolutionary Theory & Practice |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ajaf.20190705.17 |
Page(s) | 212-223 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2019. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Typical Algorithm, Yulania Sect. Rosula, Yulania Sprengeri, Yulania Urceolata, Yulania Pendula, Evolutionomy, Typici-Evolutionary Character, New Taxa
[1] | D. L. Fu. “Notes on Yulania Spach”. Journal of Wuhan Botanical Research, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 191-198, 2001. |
[2] | Z. Y. Wu, A. M. Lu, C. Y. Tang, Z. D. Chen, D. Z. Li. “A generality on the families and genera of Angiosperms in China”. Beijing; Science Press, pp. 62-64, 2003. |
[3] | KIB (Kunming Institute of Botany). “Flora Yunnanica”. vol. 16. Beijing; Science Press, pp. 25-30, 2006. |
[4] | G. H. Tian, D. L. Fu, D. W. Zhao, J. Zhao, T. B. Zhao. “Study on the Species Resources and New Classification System of Yulania Spach”. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 404-411. 2006. |
[5] | N. H. Xia, Y. H. Liu, H. P. Nooteboom. “Magnoliaceae”. In; Wu Z Y, P. H. Raven, Hong D Y. “Flora of China”, Beijing; Science Press & St. Louis, MO; Missouri Botanical Garden Press, vol. 7, pp. 71-77, 2008. |
[6] | N. H. Xia. “A New classification System of the Family Magnoliaceae”. In; Xia N H, Zheng Q W, Xu F X, Wu Q G. Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on the Family Magnoliaceae. Wuhan; Huazhong University of Science & Technology Press. pp. 12-38, 2009. |
[7] | T. B. Zhao, G. H. Tian, D. L. Fu, and D. X. Zhao. “Shijie Yulanshu Zhiwu Ziyuan yu Zaipei Liyong”. Beijing; Science Press, pp. 179-383, 2013. [in Chinese]. |
[8] | T. B. Zhao, Z. F. Ren, and G. H. Tian. “Shijie Yulanshu Zhiwu Zhongzhi Ziyuan Zhi”. Zhengzhou; Yellow River Conservancy Press, pp. 1-153, 2013. [in Chinese]. |
[9] | T. B. Zhao, L. H. Song, G. H. Tian, and Z. X. Chen. “Henan Yulan Zaipei”. Zhengzhou; Yellow River Conservancy Press, 138-310, 2015. [in Chinese]. |
[10] | D. L. Fu and H. Fu. “An evolutionary continuity principle for evolutionary system of organism divisions”. American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 60-64, 2018. DOI: 10.11648/j.ajaf.20180603.14. |
[11] | R. Pampanini. “Magnolia sprengeri Pamp”. Nouv. Giorn. Bot. Ital. n. ser. vol. 22, pp. 295, 1915. |
[12] | D. Hunt. “Magnolias and their allies”. Sherborne; International Dendrology Society and The Magnolia Society, pp. 104-126, 1998. |
[13] | Y. W. Liu. “Magnoliaceae”. In W. J. Zheng (ed.). “Flora of trees of China”, vol 1. Beijing; Science Press, pp. 455-466. 1983. |
[14] | G. H. Zhu (translator). “International Code of Botanical Nomenclature (St. Louis Code)”. Beijing; Science Press /St. Louis, MO; Missouri Botanical Garden Press, pp. 1-100, 2001. |
[15] | D. J. Callaway. “The World of Magnolias”. Portland; Timer Press, pp. 135-174, 1994. |
[16] | Agendae ASE (ed.). “Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae”, Tomus 30 (1). Beijing; Science Press, pp. 126-141. 1996. |
[17] | Y. H. Liu. “Magnolias of China”. Beijing; Science Press, 44-55, 2004. |
[18] | N. Li., W. Huang, Q. Shi, Y. Zhang, and L. Song. “A CTAB-assisted hydrothermal synthesis of VO2 (B) nanostructures for lithium-ion battery application”. Ceram. Int. vol. 39, pp. 6199–6206, 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2013.01.039. |
[19] | M. Lohse, O. Drechsel, and R. Bock. “OrganellarGenomeDRAW (OGDRAW); A tool for the easy generation of high-quality custom graphical maps of plastid and mitochondrial genomes”. Curr. Genet. vol. 52, pp. 267–274, 2007. |
[20] | C. L. Guo, L. L. Huang. “A new species of Magnolia medical plants from Hubei”. Journal of Wuhan Botanical Research, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 325-327, 1992. |
[21] | M. C. Wang, C. L. Min. “A new species of Magnolia from Shanxi”. Acta Bot. Boreal.-Occident Sin., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 85- 86, 1992. |
[22] | H. Jin, B. S. Guo, B. Liu. “New Records of Yulania Spach from Henan Province”. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, vol. 9, pp. 613-614, 2005. |
[23] | L. Y. Ma, L. R. Wang, S. C. He, X. Liu, X. Q. Wang. “A new species of Magnolia (Magnoliaceae) from Hubei, China”. Bull. Bot. Res. (Haerbin), vol. 26, no. 1. pp. 4-6, 2006. |
[24] | D. L. Fu, T. B. Zhao, Z. X. Chen, S. S. Chen. “Two New Species of Yulania Spach from Hubei Province of China”. Bulletin of Botanical Research (Haerbin), vol. 30. no. 6, pp. 641-644, 2010. |
[25] | J. L. Zhang. “Ancient and famous trees from Guizhou”. Guiyang; Guizhou Science & Tech. Press, pp. 175-177, 2004. |
[26] | H. J. Tao (456-536, Liang Dynasty). “Famous Doctors (Replica)”. Beijing; People's Health Press, pp. 64, 140, 1986. |
[27] | J. Su (Tang Dynasty). “Newly revised herbal medicine (659) (Replica)”. Hefei; Anhui Science & Tech. Press, pp. 315-316. 1981. |
[28] | S. W. Tang (Song Dynasty). “Certificate of herbal medicine (1083)”. Beijing; Huaxia Press, pp. 358-363, 1993. |
[29] | S. Z. Li (Ming Dynasty). “Compendium of herbal medicine (1578)”. Beijing; People's Health Press, pp. 1136-1137. 1957. |
[30] | Q. J. Wu (Qing Dynasty). “Research on the names and figures of plants (1848)”. Shanghai; Commercial Press, pp. 1042-1044, 1959. |
[31] | D. L. Fu, D. L. Zhang, F. W. Li, J. H. Sun, and J. H. Ren. “Two New Species of Yulania Spach from Sichuan Province of China”. Bulletin of Botanical Research (Haerbin), vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 385-389, 2010. |
[32] | NIB (Northwest Institute of Botany). “Flora of Qinling”, vol. 1. Seed Plants, no. 2. Beijing; Science Press, pp. 339, 1974. |
APA Style
Da-Li Fu, Bing-Hong Xiong, Xun Chen, Wen-Xiao Tian, Lei Du. (2019). Analyses of Chloroplast Genomic and Morphological Evolutionomy of Yulania Sprengeri and Two New Confusable Species (Magnoliaceae). American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 7(5), 212-223. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20190705.17
ACS Style
Da-Li Fu; Bing-Hong Xiong; Xun Chen; Wen-Xiao Tian; Lei Du. Analyses of Chloroplast Genomic and Morphological Evolutionomy of Yulania Sprengeri and Two New Confusable Species (Magnoliaceae). Am. J. Agric. For. 2019, 7(5), 212-223. doi: 10.11648/j.ajaf.20190705.17
AMA Style
Da-Li Fu, Bing-Hong Xiong, Xun Chen, Wen-Xiao Tian, Lei Du. Analyses of Chloroplast Genomic and Morphological Evolutionomy of Yulania Sprengeri and Two New Confusable Species (Magnoliaceae). Am J Agric For. 2019;7(5):212-223. doi: 10.11648/j.ajaf.20190705.17
@article{10.11648/j.ajaf.20190705.17, author = {Da-Li Fu and Bing-Hong Xiong and Xun Chen and Wen-Xiao Tian and Lei Du}, title = {Analyses of Chloroplast Genomic and Morphological Evolutionomy of Yulania Sprengeri and Two New Confusable Species (Magnoliaceae)}, journal = {American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry}, volume = {7}, number = {5}, pages = {212-223}, doi = {10.11648/j.ajaf.20190705.17}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20190705.17}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajaf.20190705.17}, abstract = {To scientifically solve the taxonomical confusion of Yulania sprengeri (Pamp.) D. L. Fu in the world, the chloroplast genomic sequences of four confusable species were assembled and compared with the other species of Yulania Spach by means of the typical algorithm. The results indicated that the evolutionary system of Yulania Spach includes four natural sections: Y. sect. Yulania, Y. sect. Buergeria (Sieb. & Zucc.) D. L. Fu, Y. sect. Rosula D. L. Fu, sect., nov., and Y. sect. Tulipastrum (Spach) D. L. Fu, which all have the same boundaries: PHS (17bp) = 0.96. The species Y. sprengeri (Pamp.) D. L. Fu belong to sect. Yulania, but several confusable species such as Y. diva (Stapf. ex Dandy) D. L. Fu, sp. transl. nov., Y. urceolata D. L. Fu, B. H. Xiong et X. Chen, sp. segregat. nov., Y. pendula D. L. Fu, sp. nov. and Y. viridula D. L. Fu, T. B. Zhao et G. H. Tian belong to the new section Rosula D. L. Fu. According to International Code of Botanical Nomenclature, Y. sprengeri (Pamp.) D. L. Fu is proposed for conservation and emended with the conserved type (D. L. Fu 2017100803, CAF). The misidentified epitype of Magnolia sprengeri, the illustration in Flora of Trees of China, differing taxonomically, selected as Lectotype, with almost equal specimen, paratype (D. L. Fu 2017093001, CAF) from Weining County, Guizhou province of China, was segregated as a new species, Y. urceolata D. L. Fu, B. H. Xiong et X. Chen. The other new confusable species, Y. pendula D. L. Fu, is described and illustrated based on the holotype (D. L. Fu 2012040201, CAF) from Sichuan province of China, which was once misidentified as Y. biondii (Pamp.) D. L. Fu or Y. sprengeri (Pamp.) D. L. Fu. The typci-evolutionary characters including diagnostic differences and particularity of the new section and two new species, are given respectively. The evolutionary system scientifically overcomes the partiality and subjectivity of past taxonomical systems of Yulania Spach of Magnoliaceae Juss.}, year = {2019} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Analyses of Chloroplast Genomic and Morphological Evolutionomy of Yulania Sprengeri and Two New Confusable Species (Magnoliaceae) AU - Da-Li Fu AU - Bing-Hong Xiong AU - Xun Chen AU - Wen-Xiao Tian AU - Lei Du Y1 - 2019/09/23 PY - 2019 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20190705.17 DO - 10.11648/j.ajaf.20190705.17 T2 - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry JF - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry JO - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry SP - 212 EP - 223 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-8591 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20190705.17 AB - To scientifically solve the taxonomical confusion of Yulania sprengeri (Pamp.) D. L. Fu in the world, the chloroplast genomic sequences of four confusable species were assembled and compared with the other species of Yulania Spach by means of the typical algorithm. The results indicated that the evolutionary system of Yulania Spach includes four natural sections: Y. sect. Yulania, Y. sect. Buergeria (Sieb. & Zucc.) D. L. Fu, Y. sect. Rosula D. L. Fu, sect., nov., and Y. sect. Tulipastrum (Spach) D. L. Fu, which all have the same boundaries: PHS (17bp) = 0.96. The species Y. sprengeri (Pamp.) D. L. Fu belong to sect. Yulania, but several confusable species such as Y. diva (Stapf. ex Dandy) D. L. Fu, sp. transl. nov., Y. urceolata D. L. Fu, B. H. Xiong et X. Chen, sp. segregat. nov., Y. pendula D. L. Fu, sp. nov. and Y. viridula D. L. Fu, T. B. Zhao et G. H. Tian belong to the new section Rosula D. L. Fu. According to International Code of Botanical Nomenclature, Y. sprengeri (Pamp.) D. L. Fu is proposed for conservation and emended with the conserved type (D. L. Fu 2017100803, CAF). The misidentified epitype of Magnolia sprengeri, the illustration in Flora of Trees of China, differing taxonomically, selected as Lectotype, with almost equal specimen, paratype (D. L. Fu 2017093001, CAF) from Weining County, Guizhou province of China, was segregated as a new species, Y. urceolata D. L. Fu, B. H. Xiong et X. Chen. The other new confusable species, Y. pendula D. L. Fu, is described and illustrated based on the holotype (D. L. Fu 2012040201, CAF) from Sichuan province of China, which was once misidentified as Y. biondii (Pamp.) D. L. Fu or Y. sprengeri (Pamp.) D. L. Fu. The typci-evolutionary characters including diagnostic differences and particularity of the new section and two new species, are given respectively. The evolutionary system scientifically overcomes the partiality and subjectivity of past taxonomical systems of Yulania Spach of Magnoliaceae Juss. VL - 7 IS - 5 ER -