| Peer-Reviewed

Evaluation of Quality Raw Cashew (Anacardium occidentale L.) Nuts from Major Cashew Producing Regions of Senegal

Received: 7 July 2020    Accepted: 24 July 2020    Published: 24 September 2020
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Cashew nuts are one of the main cash crops that compete strongly with groundnuts and cotton in Senegal. However, there is no clear scientific evidence to confirm or refute this argument, so this fact is not widely known. This raises a knowledge gap and justifies the need to analyze the nut quality. Raw cashew nut qualities were evaluated using the Out-turn and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) method. Twelve samples of nuts were taken from producers, processors, buyers, and exporters in the four production regions in Senegal. The main quality criteria studied are: Kernel Output Ratio (KOR), Defect Rate (DR), Kernel Yield (KY) and moisture content. The results showed that the highest KOR was recorded in the nuts sourced from Ziguinchor region (45 ± 6 lbs) while the lowest was noted in nuts from Fatick region (38 ± 9). The KORs for the Kolda (42 ± 8 lbs) and Sedhiou (42 ± 5 lbs) regions are similar. The tests indicated a good quality of Senegalese cashew nuts. The average over the whole sample is 42 ± 9 lbs per 80 kg lot compared to international standards which vary from 40 to 50 lbs per 80 kg lot. Kernel yield is 24% compared to 22% applied by the largest manufacturers in Asian and South American countries. Nut Count is 193 ±40 grains per kilogram compared to 190 grains per kilogram applied by some industrial exporters. The average moisture content is 8%, confirming the international standards. The political implication of these results is that in addition to consolidating the quality of the production, it is essential to emphasize the valorization of the kernel through processing in order to create more added value, employment, and wealth for Senegal.

Published in American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry (Volume 8, Issue 5)
DOI 10.11648/j.ajaf.20200805.12
Page(s) 190-197
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Raw, Cashew Nut, Production, Kernel, Quality, KOR, Senegal

References
[1] ACA. (2011). African Cashew Alliance, Annual Report 2011. Accra, Ghana, ACA, 16 p.
[2] Agence Nationale de la Statistique et Démographie (ANSD). (2017 a). Résumé Rapport Deuxième enquête de suivi de la pauvreté au Sénégal (ESPS), 11 p, récupéré de: anads.ansd.sn/index.php/citations/3
[3] Anato FM, Sinzogan AAC, Offenberg J, Abandonon A, Wargui R, Deguenon JM, Ayelo PM, Vayssières JF, Kossou D. (2017). Oecophylla longinoda (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) Lead to Increased Cashew Kernel Size and Kernel Quality. Journal of Economic Entomology, 110 (3): 1133-1137. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jee/tox054
[4] Azam-Ali S H. and Judge, E C. (2001) “Small-Scale cashew nut processing”, Schumacher Centre for Technology & Development, Bourton Dunsmore, Rugby, Wickshire, CV39QZ, UK.
[5] Balasubramanian, D. (2006). Improving whole kernel recovery in cashew nut processing. Agricultural Mechanisation in Asia Africa and Latin America, 37 (1): 58–64. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/279546143
[6] Coly ML. (2016). Etudes des caractéristiques morphologiques et de la germination des noix d’Anacardium occidentale L. de la région de Ziguinchor. Mémoire de Fin de cycle Master: Ecole Nationale Supérieur d’Agriculture (Sénégal), 57 p.
[7] Dahiya, S. (2010). Cashew Processors Training Program: Ouality Assessment and Harvest /Post Harvest handling. Ibadan, Nigerian. African Cashew Alliance http://www.agoatoolkit.com/agoa/English/Select%20Products/Cashews/Cashew%20sector%20Development%20Country%20Study/04.pdf
[8] Dervin C. (1988). Comment interpréter les résultats d'une analyse factorielle des correspondances? STATITCF, 75 p.
[9] Diédhiou B. (2017). Morphologie et germination comparées des semences de quatre morphotypes d’Anacardium occidentale L. au Sénégal. Mémoire de Fin de cycle: Institut Supérieur de Formation Agricole et Rurale (Sénégal), 61.
[10] Fitzpatrick, J. (2010). “Quality characteristics of Cashew nut” A survey compiled for CBI; http; //www.CBI.eu/disclaimer
[11] Gilleo J, Kebba Jassey, K, Yeager Sallah, J. (2011). Cashew Business Basics: The Gambia River Basin Cashew Value Chain Enhancement Project (CEP), International Relief and Development (IRD), récupéré de http://www.africancashewalliance.com/sites/default/files/documents/Cashew_12Oct2011.pdf
[12] Hassine, N. B. et Matoussi M. S. (2006). Compétitivité et qualité des produits: Le cas de l’agriculture et de l’agroalimentaire. 36 p.
[13] INADA, (2012). Situation de la filière anacarde dans le Balantacounda. Casamance/Sénégal, INADA vol 1, 20 p.
[14] Initiative de Cajou Africain (ICA): (2011). Fiche de Résultats n° 003/201, Bénin, récupéré de www.comcashew.org/imglib/downloads/270711_Benin_%20Cartographie%20KOR%202011.pdf. 2 p.
[15] IRD/ISRA (2013). Caractérisation des variétés d’anacarde au Sénégal et en Gambie. 11 p.
[16] Martin PJ, Topper CP, Bashiru RA, Boma F, Waal DD, Harries HH, Kasuga LJ, Katanila N, Kikoka LP, Lamboll R, Maddison AC, Majule AE, Masawe PA, Millanzi KJ, Nathaniels NQ, Shomari SH, Sijaona ME, Stathers T. (1997). Cashew nut production in Tanzania: Constraints and progress through integrated crop management. Journal Crop Protection Vol. 16 No. P 5-14. PII: SO261-2194 (96) 00067-l.
[17] Mbodj. S (2019). Les effets des arbres sur la sécurité alimentaire des ménages ruraux des zones de Niakhar et de Nioro. Mémoire pour l’obtention du diplôme d’Ingénieur des travaux statistiques, 87 p.
[18] Millago ADM (2014). Etudes des caractéristiques morphologiques et de la viabilité des semences de Parkia Biglobosa (jacq.) r. br. ex g. don. - germoplasme de conservation à long terme à 4°c. Mémoire de master de fin cycle IRD de Bobo Diolassou/Burkina Faso. 61 p.
[19] Ndiaye L. (2019). Identification et caractérisation des différentes variétés d’anacardiers (Anacardium Occidentale L.) Cultivées dans le Balantacounda (Sénégal). Mémoire de Master Agroforesterie, Ecologie, Adaptation, 65 p.
[20] Niang, PM., (2016). Caractérisation de noix et tests de germination de six variétés d’Anacardium occidentale L. de la région de Sédhiou, Mémoire de Master: Université de Thiès (Sénégal), 50 p.
[21] Ogunsina, BS. (2013). Crackability and chemical composition of pre-treated cashew nuts using a hand-operated knife cutter. Agric Eng Int: CIGR Journal, 15 (2): 275-283. DOI: www.cigrjournal.org.
[22] Ogunwolu S. O, Yahaya L. E, Mokwunye F. C., Ogunjobi M. A. K., and Olalekan-Adeniran M. A. (2016). “Evaluation of Quality of Raw Cashew (Anacardium occidentale, L) Nut from Major Cashew Producing Areas of Nigeria.” American Journal of Food Science and Technology, vol. 4, no. 6 (2016): 178-181. doi: 10.12691/ajfst-4-6-4
[23] Pal S. (2016). Compétitivité mondiale: Données de référence sur l'industrie mondiale de transformation du cajou. Festival et Expo mondiaux 2016 sur le cajou organisés par l’ACA. Guinea-Bissau, 19- 22 septembre 2016. 15 pJ. Clerk Maxwell, A Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism, 3rd ed., vol. 2. Oxford: Clarendon, 1892, pp. 68–73.
[24] Planetoscope. 2019. Statistiques Mondiales de l’anacarde, récupéré de https://www.planetoscope.com/Epices/1253-production-de-noix-de-cajou-dans-le-monde.html
[25] Programme d’Appui au Développement Economique de la Casamance (PADEC) & International Relief and Development (IRD). (2014). Rapport des enquêtes socio-économiques sur la filière anacarde au Sénégal, 210 p.
[26] Réseau des ONG Européennes d’Appui au Développement (RONGEAD). (2015). Etude du marché de l’anacarde au Mali et en Afrique de l’Ouest. Rapport du projet de Commercialisation et Transformation de l’Anacarde dans la Région de Sikasso», financé par la Coopération Espagnole et mis en œuvre par TRAGSA et le Ministère de l’Agriculture de la République du Mali. 66 p.
[27] Samb C, Touré M, Faye E, Ba H, Diallo A, Badiane S, Sanogo D. (2018). «Caractéristiques sociodémographique, structurale et agronomique des plantations d’anacardier (Anacardium occidentale L.) du Bassin arachidier et de la Casamance / Sénégal». Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences 38 (3): 6307-6325. http://www.m.elewa.org/JAPS
[28] Sarr M. (2002) « Analyse du secteur de l'anacarde au Sénégal, situation actuelle et perspective de développement", Projet de rapport de synthèse, 44 p.
[29] Silva M., Pereira S. C. F., and Gold S. (2018). The response of the Brazilian cashew nut supply chain to natural disasters: A practice-based view. Journal of cleaner production. 204 (2018) 660-671. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.340
[30] United States Agency for International Development (USAID). (2006) «La chaine de valeur Anacarde au Sénégal: Analyse et cadre stratégique d’initiative pour la croissance de la filière», 77. p.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Fatou Dieng, Daouda Ngom, Djiby Dia, Mouhamed Rassoul Sy, Seydou Ndiaye, et al. (2020). Evaluation of Quality Raw Cashew (Anacardium occidentale L.) Nuts from Major Cashew Producing Regions of Senegal. American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 8(5), 190-197. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20200805.12

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Fatou Dieng; Daouda Ngom; Djiby Dia; Mouhamed Rassoul Sy; Seydou Ndiaye, et al. Evaluation of Quality Raw Cashew (Anacardium occidentale L.) Nuts from Major Cashew Producing Regions of Senegal. Am. J. Agric. For. 2020, 8(5), 190-197. doi: 10.11648/j.ajaf.20200805.12

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Fatou Dieng, Daouda Ngom, Djiby Dia, Mouhamed Rassoul Sy, Seydou Ndiaye, et al. Evaluation of Quality Raw Cashew (Anacardium occidentale L.) Nuts from Major Cashew Producing Regions of Senegal. Am J Agric For. 2020;8(5):190-197. doi: 10.11648/j.ajaf.20200805.12

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ajaf.20200805.12,
      author = {Fatou Dieng and Daouda Ngom and Djiby Dia and Mouhamed Rassoul Sy and Seydou Ndiaye and Mohamadou Dieye},
      title = {Evaluation of Quality Raw Cashew (Anacardium occidentale L.) Nuts from Major Cashew Producing Regions of Senegal},
      journal = {American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry},
      volume = {8},
      number = {5},
      pages = {190-197},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ajaf.20200805.12},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20200805.12},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajaf.20200805.12},
      abstract = {Cashew nuts are one of the main cash crops that compete strongly with groundnuts and cotton in Senegal. However, there is no clear scientific evidence to confirm or refute this argument, so this fact is not widely known. This raises a knowledge gap and justifies the need to analyze the nut quality. Raw cashew nut qualities were evaluated using the Out-turn and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) method. Twelve samples of nuts were taken from producers, processors, buyers, and exporters in the four production regions in Senegal. The main quality criteria studied are: Kernel Output Ratio (KOR), Defect Rate (DR), Kernel Yield (KY) and moisture content. The results showed that the highest KOR was recorded in the nuts sourced from Ziguinchor region (45 ± 6 lbs) while the lowest was noted in nuts from Fatick region (38 ± 9). The KORs for the Kolda (42 ± 8 lbs) and Sedhiou (42 ± 5 lbs) regions are similar. The tests indicated a good quality of Senegalese cashew nuts. The average over the whole sample is 42 ± 9 lbs per 80 kg lot compared to international standards which vary from 40 to 50 lbs per 80 kg lot. Kernel yield is 24% compared to 22% applied by the largest manufacturers in Asian and South American countries. Nut Count is 193 ±40 grains per kilogram compared to 190 grains per kilogram applied by some industrial exporters. The average moisture content is 8%, confirming the international standards. The political implication of these results is that in addition to consolidating the quality of the production, it is essential to emphasize the valorization of the kernel through processing in order to create more added value, employment, and wealth for Senegal.},
     year = {2020}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Evaluation of Quality Raw Cashew (Anacardium occidentale L.) Nuts from Major Cashew Producing Regions of Senegal
    AU  - Fatou Dieng
    AU  - Daouda Ngom
    AU  - Djiby Dia
    AU  - Mouhamed Rassoul Sy
    AU  - Seydou Ndiaye
    AU  - Mohamadou Dieye
    Y1  - 2020/09/24
    PY  - 2020
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20200805.12
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ajaf.20200805.12
    T2  - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry
    JF  - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry
    JO  - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry
    SP  - 190
    EP  - 197
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2330-8591
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20200805.12
    AB  - Cashew nuts are one of the main cash crops that compete strongly with groundnuts and cotton in Senegal. However, there is no clear scientific evidence to confirm or refute this argument, so this fact is not widely known. This raises a knowledge gap and justifies the need to analyze the nut quality. Raw cashew nut qualities were evaluated using the Out-turn and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) method. Twelve samples of nuts were taken from producers, processors, buyers, and exporters in the four production regions in Senegal. The main quality criteria studied are: Kernel Output Ratio (KOR), Defect Rate (DR), Kernel Yield (KY) and moisture content. The results showed that the highest KOR was recorded in the nuts sourced from Ziguinchor region (45 ± 6 lbs) while the lowest was noted in nuts from Fatick region (38 ± 9). The KORs for the Kolda (42 ± 8 lbs) and Sedhiou (42 ± 5 lbs) regions are similar. The tests indicated a good quality of Senegalese cashew nuts. The average over the whole sample is 42 ± 9 lbs per 80 kg lot compared to international standards which vary from 40 to 50 lbs per 80 kg lot. Kernel yield is 24% compared to 22% applied by the largest manufacturers in Asian and South American countries. Nut Count is 193 ±40 grains per kilogram compared to 190 grains per kilogram applied by some industrial exporters. The average moisture content is 8%, confirming the international standards. The political implication of these results is that in addition to consolidating the quality of the production, it is essential to emphasize the valorization of the kernel through processing in order to create more added value, employment, and wealth for Senegal.
    VL  - 8
    IS  - 5
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Agroforestry, Assane Seck University, Diabir, Ziguinchor, Senegal

  • Laboratory of Plant Ecology, Faculty of Science and Technology, Cheikh Anta Diop University, Dakar, Senegal

  • Bureau d’Analyses Macro-Economiques, Institut Senegalais de Recherches Agricoles, Bel Air Route des Hydrocarbures, Dakar, Senegal

  • Bureau d’Analyses Macro-Economiques, Institut Senegalais de Recherches Agricoles, Bel Air Route des Hydrocarbures, Dakar, Senegal

  • Department of Agroforestry, Assane Seck University, Diabir, Ziguinchor, Senegal

  • Bureau d’Analyses Macro-Economiques, Institut Senegalais de Recherches Agricoles, Bel Air Route des Hydrocarbures, Dakar, Senegal

  • Sections