| Peer-Reviewed

Ecological Plasticity of New Winter Wheat Varieties Under Environments of Ukrainian Forest-Steppe and Polissia

Received: 22 February 2021    Accepted: 11 March 2021    Published: 17 March 2021
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

The research was conducted to evaluate winter wheat varieties in terms of yield, stability and plasticity in different agro-ecological zones. Ten varieties of winter wheat were sown during 2015-16–2017-18 in two agro-ecological research zones: Forest-Steppe (the V. M. Remeslo Myronivka Institute of Wheat) and Polissia (Nosivka Plant Breeding and Experimental Station). Methods of descriptive statistics and analysis of variance were used for data statistical processing. For all three years during active plant vegetation the hydrothermal coefficient was 0.9–1.2 in the Forest-Steppe zone and in the Polissia zone it was 1.0–1.3. Winter wheat yield formation was negatively affected by the conditions of 2016-17 in the Forest-Steppe zone and 2017-18 in Polissia zone according to the relative environmental index (REI = 66 and 73, respectively). The analysis of hydrothermal conditions of different agro-climatic zones of winter wheat cultivation indicates on significant variation of the influence of these conditions on individual stages of plant development. This made it possible to identify varieties with high ecological plasticity which are able to respond less to fluctuations in environmental conditions. Using analysis of variance, it was found that winter wheat yielding capacity was significantly influenced by the factors “Zone” and “Year” (28.8, 22.9%, respectively), but theу most (36.4%) it was influenced by the interaction “Year × Zone”, this indicates a significant difference in the impact of hydrothermal conditions on this trait depending on the agro-ecological zone of cultivation. It was established that the conditions of the Forest-Steppe zone were favorable for the maximum realization of yield potential of the variety Horlytsia myronivs’ka (8.35 t/ha), while the conditions of Polissia zone were favorable for the varieties MIP Dniprianka, MIP Valensiia, Hospodynia myronivs’ka, Estafeta myronivs’ka, Hratsiia myronivs’ka (9.42; 9.65; 9.62; 9.69; 9.66 t/ha, respectively). According to the regression coefficient, the varieties Trudivnytsia myronivs’ka, Horlytsia myronivs’ka, MIP Valensiia, MIP Kniazhna, Estafeta myronivs’ka (bi = 0.89; 0.89; 0.93; 0.95; 0.99, respectively) with the best adaptive ability to unvavourable growing conditions were identified. According to the stability variance of the trait, there were identified the most stable varieties, namely MIP Kniazhna, Trudivnytsia myronivs’ka, MIP Dniprianka, Vezha myronivs’ka, Hratsiia myronivs’ka (S2di = 0.07; 0.09; 0.12; 0.17; 0.20, respectively) and the most unstable ones – Horlytsia myronivs’ka, Estafeta myronivs’ka, MIP Valensiia (S2di = 1.33; 0.83; 0.68, respectively).

Published in American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry (Volume 9, Issue 2)
DOI 10.11648/j.ajaf.20210902.12
Page(s) 53-60
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Ecological Plasticity and Stability, Agro-ecological Zone, Winter Wheat Variety, Yield

References
[1] Acquaah, G. (2012). Principles of Plant Genetics and Breeding. 2-nd Edition. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9781118313718.
[2] Agriculture of Ukraine 2016. Statistical Bulletin (2017). Kyiv: State Statistics Service of Ukraine, 246 p. (UA).
[3] Demydov, O. A., Vasylkivskyi, S. P., & Hudzenko, V. M. (2017). Ecological and genetic aspects of winter barley selection to increase its productive and adaptive potential in the forest-steppe of Ukraine. Agroecological Journal, 2, 194–200 (UA). doi: 10.33730/2077-4893.2.2017.220293.
[4] Dockter, C., Gruszka, D., Braumann, I., Druka, A., Druka, I., Franckowiak, J., Gough, S. P., Janeczko, A., Kurowska, M., Lundqvist, J., Lundqvist, U., Marzec, M., Matyszczak, I., Muller, A. H., Oklestkova, J., Schulz, B., Zakhrabekova, S., & Hansson, M. (2014). Induced variations in brassinosteroid genes define barley height and sturdiness, and expand the green revolution genetic toolkit. Plant Physiol., 166 (4), 1912–1927. doi: 10.1104/pp.114.250738.
[5] Eberhart, S. A., & Russel, W. A. (1966). Stability parameter for comparing varieties. Crop Sci., 6 (1), 36–40.
[6] Eriksson, G., Clapham, D., & Ekberg, I. (2006). An Introduction to Forest Genetics. 2-nd Edition. Uppsala: SLU, 185 p.
[7] Gauch, H. G., Rodrigues, P. C., Munkvold, J. D., Heffner, E. L., & Sorrells, M. (2011). Two new strategies for detecting and understanding QTL × environment interactions. Crop Sci., 51 (1), 96–113. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2010.04.0206.
[8] Gudzenko, V. N. (2019). Statistical and graphical (GGE biplot) evaluation of the adaptive ability and stability of winter barley breeding lines. Vavilov J. Gen. Breed., 23 (1), 110–118 (RU). doi: 10.18699/VJ19.469.
[9] Haida, Yu. I., Sishchuk, M. N., & Yatsyk, R. M. (2013). Environmental stability and plasticity of growth traits of Quercus robur L. and Pinus sibirika Du Tour. in provenance trials. Scientific bulletin of UNFU, 23 (13), 101–109 (UA).
[10] Hill, J. (2009). Genotype-environment interaction – a challenge for plant breeding. Agricultural Sci., 85 (3), 477–493. doi: 10.1017/S0021859600062365.
[11] Khangil’din, V. V., & Litvineno, N. A. (1981). Homeostaticity and adaptability of winter wheat varieties. Scientific and Technical Bul. VSGI, 39, 8–14 (RU).
[12] Kochmarskyi, V. S., Zamlila, N. P., Volohdina, H. B., Humeniuk, O. V., & Voloshchuk, S. I. (2016). Adaptability level of perspective lines of bread winter wheat in the conditions of Forest-Steppe of Ukraine. Myronivka Bulletin, 2, 98–115 (UA).
[13] Konishchuk, V. V., & Yehorova, T. M. (2018). Agroecological zoning of Ukraine. Agroecological Journal, 4, 6–22 (UA). doi: 10.33730/2077-4893.4.2018.155744.
[14] Litun, P. P. (1980). Interaction of genotype-environment in genetic research and methods of its study. In Problems of Selection and Evaluation of Breeding Material (pp. 63–93). Кiev: Naukova dumka (UA).
[15] Malosetti, M., Ribaut, J., & van Eeuwijk, F. (2013). The statistical analysis of multi-environment data: modeling genotype-by-environment interaction and its genetic basis. Front. Physiol., 4, Article 44, 17 p. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2013.00044.
[16] Parameters of Ecological Plasticity of Agricultural Plants, Their Calculation and Analysis: Methodical Recommendations (1984). (pp. 11–20) Novosibirsk (RU).
[17] Starychenko, V. M., Golyk, L. M., Tkachova, N. A., & Lytus, M. V. (2014). The estimation of the adaptive abilities and stability of varieties and breeder lines in the bread wheat breeding. Plant breeding and seed production, 105, 77–84 (UA). doi: 10.30835/2413-7510.2014.42055.
[18] Scheiner, S. M. (1993). Genetics and evolution of phenotypic plasticity. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 24, 35–68. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.24.1.35.
[19] Selyaninov, G. T. (1937). Methods of agricultural characteristics of climate. In World Agroclimatic Reference Book (pp. 4–29). Moscow: Gidrometeoizdat (RU).
[20] Tymofieiev, M. M., Bondareva, O. B., & Viniukov, O. O. (2017). Biologization of crop production is the basis for the formation of sustainable agrobiocenoses. Grain Crops, 1 (1), 79–85 (UA).
[21] Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Center. Retrieved from https://meteo.gov.ua/ua/33466/climate/climate/
[22] Van Eeuwijk, F., Bustos-Korts, D. V., & Malosetti, M. (2016). What should students in plant breeding know about the statistical aspects of genotype × environment interactions? Crop Sci., 56 (5), 2119–2140.
[23] Vlasenko, V. A., Kochmarskyi, V. S., Koliuchyi, V. T., Kolomiiets, L. A., Khomenko, S. O., & Solona, V. Y. (2012). Agro-climate characteristics of the territory of creation of Myronivka wheat varieties. In Breeding Evolution of Myronivka wheats (pp. 13–22). Myronivka (UA).
[24] White, T. L., Adams, W. T., & Neale, D. B. (2009). Forest Genetics. CABI Pub. 682 p.
[25] Yan, W., & Hunt, L. A. (2001). Interpretation of genotype × environment interaction for winter wheat yield in Ontario. Crop Sci., 41 (1), 19–25.
[26] Zamlila N. P., Demydov O. A., Volohdina H. B., Voloshchuk S. I. & Humeniuk O. V. (2019). Yielding capacity and adaptability of winter bread wheat breeding lines in environment of Ukrainian Forest-Steppe. Myronivka Bulletin, 9, 35–42 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31073/mvis201909-05.
[27] Zas, R., Merlo, E., & Fernandez-Lopez, J. (2004). Genotype × environment interaction in maritime pine families in Galicia, Northwest Spain. Silvae Genetica, 53 (4). 175–182.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Oleksandr Demydov, Vira Kyrylenko, Bohdana Blyzniuk, Halyna Volohdina, Oleksandr Humeniuk, et al. (2021). Ecological Plasticity of New Winter Wheat Varieties Under Environments of Ukrainian Forest-Steppe and Polissia. American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 9(2), 53-60. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20210902.12

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Oleksandr Demydov; Vira Kyrylenko; Bohdana Blyzniuk; Halyna Volohdina; Oleksandr Humeniuk, et al. Ecological Plasticity of New Winter Wheat Varieties Under Environments of Ukrainian Forest-Steppe and Polissia. Am. J. Agric. For. 2021, 9(2), 53-60. doi: 10.11648/j.ajaf.20210902.12

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Oleksandr Demydov, Vira Kyrylenko, Bohdana Blyzniuk, Halyna Volohdina, Oleksandr Humeniuk, et al. Ecological Plasticity of New Winter Wheat Varieties Under Environments of Ukrainian Forest-Steppe and Polissia. Am J Agric For. 2021;9(2):53-60. doi: 10.11648/j.ajaf.20210902.12

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ajaf.20210902.12,
      author = {Oleksandr Demydov and Vira Kyrylenko and Bohdana Blyzniuk and Halyna Volohdina and Oleksandr Humeniuk and Inna Misiura and Iryna Pravdziva},
      title = {Ecological Plasticity of New Winter Wheat Varieties Under Environments of Ukrainian Forest-Steppe and Polissia},
      journal = {American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry},
      volume = {9},
      number = {2},
      pages = {53-60},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ajaf.20210902.12},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20210902.12},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajaf.20210902.12},
      abstract = {The research was conducted to evaluate winter wheat varieties in terms of yield, stability and plasticity in different agro-ecological zones. Ten varieties of winter wheat were sown during 2015-16–2017-18 in two agro-ecological research zones: Forest-Steppe (the V. M. Remeslo Myronivka Institute of Wheat) and Polissia (Nosivka Plant Breeding and Experimental Station). Methods of descriptive statistics and analysis of variance were used for data statistical processing. For all three years during active plant vegetation the hydrothermal coefficient was 0.9–1.2 in the Forest-Steppe zone and in the Polissia zone it was 1.0–1.3. Winter wheat yield formation was negatively affected by the conditions of 2016-17 in the Forest-Steppe zone and 2017-18 in Polissia zone according to the relative environmental index (REI = 66 and 73, respectively). The analysis of hydrothermal conditions of different agro-climatic zones of winter wheat cultivation indicates on significant variation of the influence of these conditions on individual stages of plant development. This made it possible to identify varieties with high ecological plasticity which are able to respond less to fluctuations in environmental conditions. Using analysis of variance, it was found that winter wheat yielding capacity was significantly influenced by the factors “Zone” and “Year” (28.8, 22.9%, respectively), but theу most (36.4%) it was influenced by the interaction “Year × Zone”, this indicates a significant difference in the impact of hydrothermal conditions on this trait depending on the agro-ecological zone of cultivation. It was established that the conditions of the Forest-Steppe zone were favorable for the maximum realization of yield potential of the variety Horlytsia myronivs’ka (8.35 t/ha), while the conditions of Polissia zone were favorable for the varieties MIP Dniprianka, MIP Valensiia, Hospodynia myronivs’ka, Estafeta myronivs’ka, Hratsiia myronivs’ka (9.42; 9.65; 9.62; 9.69; 9.66 t/ha, respectively). According to the regression coefficient, the varieties Trudivnytsia myronivs’ka, Horlytsia myronivs’ka, MIP Valensiia, MIP Kniazhna, Estafeta myronivs’ka (bi = 0.89; 0.89; 0.93; 0.95; 0.99, respectively) with the best adaptive ability to unvavourable growing conditions were identified. According to the stability variance of the trait, there were identified the most stable varieties, namely MIP Kniazhna, Trudivnytsia myronivs’ka, MIP Dniprianka, Vezha myronivs’ka, Hratsiia myronivs’ka (S2di = 0.07; 0.09; 0.12; 0.17; 0.20, respectively) and the most unstable ones – Horlytsia myronivs’ka, Estafeta myronivs’ka, MIP Valensiia (S2di = 1.33; 0.83; 0.68, respectively).},
     year = {2021}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Ecological Plasticity of New Winter Wheat Varieties Under Environments of Ukrainian Forest-Steppe and Polissia
    AU  - Oleksandr Demydov
    AU  - Vira Kyrylenko
    AU  - Bohdana Blyzniuk
    AU  - Halyna Volohdina
    AU  - Oleksandr Humeniuk
    AU  - Inna Misiura
    AU  - Iryna Pravdziva
    Y1  - 2021/03/17
    PY  - 2021
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20210902.12
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ajaf.20210902.12
    T2  - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry
    JF  - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry
    JO  - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry
    SP  - 53
    EP  - 60
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2330-8591
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20210902.12
    AB  - The research was conducted to evaluate winter wheat varieties in terms of yield, stability and plasticity in different agro-ecological zones. Ten varieties of winter wheat were sown during 2015-16–2017-18 in two agro-ecological research zones: Forest-Steppe (the V. M. Remeslo Myronivka Institute of Wheat) and Polissia (Nosivka Plant Breeding and Experimental Station). Methods of descriptive statistics and analysis of variance were used for data statistical processing. For all three years during active plant vegetation the hydrothermal coefficient was 0.9–1.2 in the Forest-Steppe zone and in the Polissia zone it was 1.0–1.3. Winter wheat yield formation was negatively affected by the conditions of 2016-17 in the Forest-Steppe zone and 2017-18 in Polissia zone according to the relative environmental index (REI = 66 and 73, respectively). The analysis of hydrothermal conditions of different agro-climatic zones of winter wheat cultivation indicates on significant variation of the influence of these conditions on individual stages of plant development. This made it possible to identify varieties with high ecological plasticity which are able to respond less to fluctuations in environmental conditions. Using analysis of variance, it was found that winter wheat yielding capacity was significantly influenced by the factors “Zone” and “Year” (28.8, 22.9%, respectively), but theу most (36.4%) it was influenced by the interaction “Year × Zone”, this indicates a significant difference in the impact of hydrothermal conditions on this trait depending on the agro-ecological zone of cultivation. It was established that the conditions of the Forest-Steppe zone were favorable for the maximum realization of yield potential of the variety Horlytsia myronivs’ka (8.35 t/ha), while the conditions of Polissia zone were favorable for the varieties MIP Dniprianka, MIP Valensiia, Hospodynia myronivs’ka, Estafeta myronivs’ka, Hratsiia myronivs’ka (9.42; 9.65; 9.62; 9.69; 9.66 t/ha, respectively). According to the regression coefficient, the varieties Trudivnytsia myronivs’ka, Horlytsia myronivs’ka, MIP Valensiia, MIP Kniazhna, Estafeta myronivs’ka (bi = 0.89; 0.89; 0.93; 0.95; 0.99, respectively) with the best adaptive ability to unvavourable growing conditions were identified. According to the stability variance of the trait, there were identified the most stable varieties, namely MIP Kniazhna, Trudivnytsia myronivs’ka, MIP Dniprianka, Vezha myronivs’ka, Hratsiia myronivs’ka (S2di = 0.07; 0.09; 0.12; 0.17; 0.20, respectively) and the most unstable ones – Horlytsia myronivs’ka, Estafeta myronivs’ka, MIP Valensiia (S2di = 1.33; 0.83; 0.68, respectively).
    VL  - 9
    IS  - 2
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Cereal Crops Breeding, The V. M. Remeslo Myronivka Institute of Wheat of the NAAS, National Academy of Agrarian Sciences of Ukraine, Tsentralne Village, Ukraine

  • Department of Cereal Crops Breeding, The V. M. Remeslo Myronivka Institute of Wheat of the NAAS, National Academy of Agrarian Sciences of Ukraine, Tsentralne Village, Ukraine

  • Department of Cereal Crops Breeding, The V. M. Remeslo Myronivka Institute of Wheat of the NAAS, National Academy of Agrarian Sciences of Ukraine, Tsentralne Village, Ukraine

  • Department of Cereal Crops Breeding, The V. M. Remeslo Myronivka Institute of Wheat of the NAAS, National Academy of Agrarian Sciences of Ukraine, Tsentralne Village, Ukraine

  • Department of Cereal Crops Breeding, The V. M. Remeslo Myronivka Institute of Wheat of the NAAS, National Academy of Agrarian Sciences of Ukraine, Tsentralne Village, Ukraine

  • Department of Cereal Crops Breeding, The V. M. Remeslo Myronivka Institute of Wheat of the NAAS, National Academy of Agrarian Sciences of Ukraine, Tsentralne Village, Ukraine

  • Department of Cereal Crops Breeding, The V. M. Remeslo Myronivka Institute of Wheat of the NAAS, National Academy of Agrarian Sciences of Ukraine, Tsentralne Village, Ukraine

  • Sections