| Peer-Reviewed

Energy Inputs of Selected Agroforestry Systems in Zamboanga City, Philippines

Received: 14 April 2021    Accepted: 8 May 2021    Published: 20 May 2021
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

A study aimed to estimate the energy inputs of selected agroforestry systems (AFSs) within the Community-Based Forest Management (CBFM) in Zamboanga City, Philippines was conducted. All Mcal units were converted into Liter Diesel Oil Equivalent (LDOE), where 1.0 LDOE = 11.414 Mcal. Purposive sampling was used in determining the fitted characteristics and the number of respondents required across the 16 CBFM sites, where nine (9) dominant AFSs were identified. A total of 100 respondents were interviewed using a structured questionnaire. The relationships of predictors such as the direct, indirect and embedded energy inputs per AFS were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Means, percentages and sums were compared. The rubber+1based AFS obtained the lowest total energy inputs (TEI) at 5,790.5 Mcal ha-1 or equal to 507.3 LDOE ha-1, while the rubber+3based AFS obtained the highest TEI at 11,801.3 Mcal ha-1 (1,034.0 LDOE ha-1) compared to other AFSs such as the coconut+1based, mango-based, marang-based, lanzones-based, coconut+3based, rubber+2based and coconut+2based with individual TEI that ranged from 6,267.16-11,250.2 Mcal ha-1 (549.1-985.6 LDOE ha-1). Of the total TEI across the nine (9) AFSs, the direct energy input (DEI) contributed 1.6-5.4%, indirect energy input (IEI) 94.1-98.0% and embedded energy input (EEI) 0.3-0.5%, respectively. The TEI is the sum total of DEI, IEI and EEI where each was accounted from pre-land preparation (PLP), crop establishment (CE), crop care and maintenance (CCM), harvest and postharvest (HPH) activities. The high imputed cost on IEI was attributed to high usage of agrochemicals and labor which are identified as the ‘energy hotspots’ or the energy-intensive inputs. The high plant density and number of trees present within the system contributed significantly in the overall TEI. Understanding the significant contributions of various energy-intensive systems will guide policy makers and local planners to initiate an integrated farming approach with reduced energy inputs that is climate smart with higher economic potential for the upland environment in the City of Zamboanga.

Published in American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry (Volume 9, Issue 3)
DOI 10.11648/j.ajaf.20210903.12
Page(s) 106-113
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Agroforestry Systems (AFSs), Total Energy Inputs (TEI), Indirect Energy Input (IEI), Liter Diesel Oil Equivalent (LDOE), Energy Hotspots

References
[1] Pimentel, D. 1984. Energy flows in agricultural and natural ecosystems. Options Mediterraneennes (France).
[2] Thu, M. K. & Mendoza, T. C. 2011. Energy Use in Rice, Cotton and Sugarcane Production in Myanmar. Philippine Scientist 48: 124-142.
[3] Taghavi, S. M. & Mendoza, T. C. (2011). Energy Accounting of Irrigated Wheat Production to Post Production (Baking Bread) in Doroodzan, Fars Province, Iran. Annals of Tropical Research 33 (2): 1-18.
[4] Egle, R. B. & Mendoza, T. C. (2013). Energy Use of Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) Grown in Various Nutrient Supply Options. Philippine Journal of Crop Science (PJCS) April, 38 (1), 43-51.
[5] Pimentel, D. 1980 (Ed). Handbook of energy utilization in agriculture.
[6] GRACE Communications Foundation (GCF), 2016. Energy and Agriculture. http://www.gracelinks.org/118/energy-and-agriculture. Accessed 10-20-2016.
[7] Pimentel, D., Berardi, G., & Fast, S. 1983. Energy efficiency of farming systems: organic and conventional agriculture. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 9 (4), 359-372.
[8] Pfeiffer, D. (2009). Eating fossil fuels: oil, food and the coming crisis in agriculture. New Society Publishers.
[9] Pimentel, D., Williamson, S., Alexander, C. E., Gonzalez-Pagan, O., Kontak, C., & Mulkey, S. E. 2008. Reducing energy inputs in the US food system. Human Ecology, 36 (4), 459-471.
[10] Mendoza, T. C. 2016. Reducing the High Energy Bill and Carbon Footprint for an Energy and Climate Change-Compliant Sugarcane Production. University of the Philippines, Los Banos, Laguna, Philippines.
[11] Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). 2003. Agriculture, food and water: A contribution to the “world water development report”, Rome, Italy: FAO.
[12] Yaldiz, O., Ozturk, H. H., Zeren, Y., & Bascetincelik, A. 1993. Energy usage in production of field crops in Turkey. In 5th International Congress on Mechanization and Energy Use in Agriculture. Turkey: Kusadasi (pp. 11-14).
[13] Shrestha, D. S. 1998. Energy input-output and their cost analysis in Nepalese agriculture. Accessed on: http://www. public. iastate. edu.
[14] Singh, H., Mishra, D., & Nahar, N. M. 2002. Energy use pattern in production agriculture of a typical village in arid zone, India – part I. Energy Conversion and Management, 43 (16), 2275-2286.
[15] Mendoza, T. C., & Samson, R. 2002. Energy costs of sugar production in the Philippine Context. Philippine Journal of Crop Science, 27 (2), 17-26.
[16] Ozkan, B., Akcaoz, H., & Fert, C. 2004. Energy input–output analysis in Turkish agriculture. Renewable energy, 29 (1), 39-51.
[17] Mendoza, T. C. 2014. Reducing the carbon footprint of sugar production in the Philippines. Journal of Agricultural Technology 10 (1): 289-308.
[18] Ratilla, B. C., & Mendoza, T. C. 2016. Energy Productivity and Efficiency of Lowland Rice (Var. PSB Rc18) Under Various Organic Nutrient Sources and Quantum Enhancers. Annals of Tropical Research, 38 (1), 105-121.
[19] Mohammadshirazi, A., Akram, A., Rafiee, S., Avval, S. H. M., & Kalhor, E. B. (2012). An analysis of energy use and relation between energy inputs and yield in tangerine production. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16 (7), 4515-4521.
[20] Goe, M. R., & MacDowell, R. E. (1980). Animal traction: guidelines for utilization.
[21] Shresta, D. S. 2002. Energy use efficiency indicator for agriculture. http://www.usaskca/agriculture/caedac/PDF/mcrae. Accessed April 28, 2018.
[22] Esengün, H. Erdal, G., K. Erdal and O. Gündüz, O. 2007. Energy use and economical analysis of sugar beet production in Tokat province of Turkey. Energy, 32 (1), pp. 35-41.
[23] Yilmaz, I., Akcaoz, H., & Ozkan, B. 2005. An analysis of energy use and input costs for cotton production in Turkey. Renewable Energy, 30 (2), 145-155.
[24] Karimi, M., P. A. Rajabi, A. Tabatabaeefar & A. Borghei. 2008. Energy Analysis of Sugarcane Production in Plant Farms. A Case Study in Debel Khazai Agro-Industry in Iran. American-Eurasian J. Agric. & Environ. Sci. 4 (2): 165-171.
[25] Gliessman, S. R. 2014. Agroecology: the ecology of sustainable food systems. CRC press.
[26] Savuth, S. 2018. The energy cost of Cambodian lowland rice grown under different establishment methods. MS Thesis. UPLB. College, Laguna.
[27] Wells, D. 2001. Total energy indicators of agricultural sustainability: dairy farming case study. Technical Paper 2001/3. Min. Agric. Forestry, Wellington, http://www.maf.govt.nz
[28] Bockari-Gevao, S. M., W. I. Wan Ishak Bin, A. Yahya and C.C. Wan. 2005. “Analysis of energy consumption in lowland rice-based cropping system of Malaysia.” Energy 27, no. 4 (2005): 820.
[29] Mendoza, T. C., & Samson, R. (2000). Estimates of CO2 emission from the burning of crop residues. Journal of Environmental Science and Management (Philippines).
[30] Chamsing, A., V. M. Salokhe and G. Singh. 2006. Energy consumption analysis for selected crops in different regions of Thailand. Agricultural Engineering International: CIGR Journal.
[31] Sidalc, B. 1985. Copersucar Annual Report 84/85 [Central Cooperative of Sugar and Alcohol Producers of the State of Sao Paulo]. P. presses: Sao Paulo, SP (Brazil). 1985. 24 p.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Elderico Perater Tabal, Teodoro Castañeda Mendoza, Roselyn Furoc Paelmo, Jose Nestor Montealto Garcia, Roberto Garaña Visco. (2021). Energy Inputs of Selected Agroforestry Systems in Zamboanga City, Philippines. American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 9(3), 106-113. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20210903.12

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Elderico Perater Tabal; Teodoro Castañeda Mendoza; Roselyn Furoc Paelmo; Jose Nestor Montealto Garcia; Roberto Garaña Visco. Energy Inputs of Selected Agroforestry Systems in Zamboanga City, Philippines. Am. J. Agric. For. 2021, 9(3), 106-113. doi: 10.11648/j.ajaf.20210903.12

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Elderico Perater Tabal, Teodoro Castañeda Mendoza, Roselyn Furoc Paelmo, Jose Nestor Montealto Garcia, Roberto Garaña Visco. Energy Inputs of Selected Agroforestry Systems in Zamboanga City, Philippines. Am J Agric For. 2021;9(3):106-113. doi: 10.11648/j.ajaf.20210903.12

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ajaf.20210903.12,
      author = {Elderico Perater Tabal and Teodoro Castañeda Mendoza and Roselyn Furoc Paelmo and Jose Nestor Montealto Garcia and Roberto Garaña Visco},
      title = {Energy Inputs of Selected Agroforestry Systems in Zamboanga City, Philippines},
      journal = {American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry},
      volume = {9},
      number = {3},
      pages = {106-113},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ajaf.20210903.12},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20210903.12},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajaf.20210903.12},
      abstract = {A study aimed to estimate the energy inputs of selected agroforestry systems (AFSs) within the Community-Based Forest Management (CBFM) in Zamboanga City, Philippines was conducted. All Mcal units were converted into Liter Diesel Oil Equivalent (LDOE), where 1.0 LDOE = 11.414 Mcal. Purposive sampling was used in determining the fitted characteristics and the number of respondents required across the 16 CBFM sites, where nine (9) dominant AFSs were identified. A total of 100 respondents were interviewed using a structured questionnaire. The relationships of predictors such as the direct, indirect and embedded energy inputs per AFS were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Means, percentages and sums were compared. The rubber+1based AFS obtained the lowest total energy inputs (TEI) at 5,790.5 Mcal ha-1 or equal to 507.3 LDOE ha-1, while the rubber+3based AFS obtained the highest TEI at 11,801.3 Mcal ha-1 (1,034.0 LDOE ha-1) compared to other AFSs such as the coconut+1based, mango-based, marang-based, lanzones-based, coconut+3based, rubber+2based and coconut+2based with individual TEI that ranged from 6,267.16-11,250.2 Mcal ha-1 (549.1-985.6 LDOE ha-1). Of the total TEI across the nine (9) AFSs, the direct energy input (DEI) contributed 1.6-5.4%, indirect energy input (IEI) 94.1-98.0% and embedded energy input (EEI) 0.3-0.5%, respectively. The TEI is the sum total of DEI, IEI and EEI where each was accounted from pre-land preparation (PLP), crop establishment (CE), crop care and maintenance (CCM), harvest and postharvest (HPH) activities. The high imputed cost on IEI was attributed to high usage of agrochemicals and labor which are identified as the ‘energy hotspots’ or the energy-intensive inputs. The high plant density and number of trees present within the system contributed significantly in the overall TEI. Understanding the significant contributions of various energy-intensive systems will guide policy makers and local planners to initiate an integrated farming approach with reduced energy inputs that is climate smart with higher economic potential for the upland environment in the City of Zamboanga.},
     year = {2021}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Energy Inputs of Selected Agroforestry Systems in Zamboanga City, Philippines
    AU  - Elderico Perater Tabal
    AU  - Teodoro Castañeda Mendoza
    AU  - Roselyn Furoc Paelmo
    AU  - Jose Nestor Montealto Garcia
    AU  - Roberto Garaña Visco
    Y1  - 2021/05/20
    PY  - 2021
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20210903.12
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ajaf.20210903.12
    T2  - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry
    JF  - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry
    JO  - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry
    SP  - 106
    EP  - 113
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2330-8591
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20210903.12
    AB  - A study aimed to estimate the energy inputs of selected agroforestry systems (AFSs) within the Community-Based Forest Management (CBFM) in Zamboanga City, Philippines was conducted. All Mcal units were converted into Liter Diesel Oil Equivalent (LDOE), where 1.0 LDOE = 11.414 Mcal. Purposive sampling was used in determining the fitted characteristics and the number of respondents required across the 16 CBFM sites, where nine (9) dominant AFSs were identified. A total of 100 respondents were interviewed using a structured questionnaire. The relationships of predictors such as the direct, indirect and embedded energy inputs per AFS were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Means, percentages and sums were compared. The rubber+1based AFS obtained the lowest total energy inputs (TEI) at 5,790.5 Mcal ha-1 or equal to 507.3 LDOE ha-1, while the rubber+3based AFS obtained the highest TEI at 11,801.3 Mcal ha-1 (1,034.0 LDOE ha-1) compared to other AFSs such as the coconut+1based, mango-based, marang-based, lanzones-based, coconut+3based, rubber+2based and coconut+2based with individual TEI that ranged from 6,267.16-11,250.2 Mcal ha-1 (549.1-985.6 LDOE ha-1). Of the total TEI across the nine (9) AFSs, the direct energy input (DEI) contributed 1.6-5.4%, indirect energy input (IEI) 94.1-98.0% and embedded energy input (EEI) 0.3-0.5%, respectively. The TEI is the sum total of DEI, IEI and EEI where each was accounted from pre-land preparation (PLP), crop establishment (CE), crop care and maintenance (CCM), harvest and postharvest (HPH) activities. The high imputed cost on IEI was attributed to high usage of agrochemicals and labor which are identified as the ‘energy hotspots’ or the energy-intensive inputs. The high plant density and number of trees present within the system contributed significantly in the overall TEI. Understanding the significant contributions of various energy-intensive systems will guide policy makers and local planners to initiate an integrated farming approach with reduced energy inputs that is climate smart with higher economic potential for the upland environment in the City of Zamboanga.
    VL  - 9
    IS  - 3
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • College of Agriculture and Food Science, University of the Philippines Los Ba?os, Laguna, Philippines

  • College of Agriculture and Food Science, University of the Philippines Los Ba?os, Laguna, Philippines

  • College of Agriculture and Food Science, University of the Philippines Los Ba?os, Laguna, Philippines

  • Sections