Impact of Alleyway and In-row Planted Groundcovers in Midwestern Vineyard

Benjamin Allen Loseke; Paul Eugene Read; Stephen Joseph Gamet

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ajaf.20210903.16

| Peer-Reviewed

Impact of Alleyway and In-row Planted Groundcovers in Midwestern Vineyard

Benjamin Allen Loseke, Paul Eugene Read, Stephen Joseph Gamet

Published in American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry (Volume 9, Issue 3)

Received: 16 April 2021 Accepted: 14 May 2021 Published: 27 May 2021

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

In many Midwestern vineyards a one meter weed-free strip is maintained directly beneath the vines to reduce vine-weed competition. Conventionally, this strip has been conserved with repeated applications of herbicide, mainly glyphosate. The necessity for this weed-free strip to reduce vine-weed competition has been well documented in more arid climates. However, in areas with higher soil fertility and adequate rainfall grapevines can become overly vigorous and competition with a groundcover (GC) has been shown to be a useful tool to alleviate excess growth. Moreover, stand establishment and early vine growth have not been well documented when planting GC immediately following the vine planting. The main objective of this project was to assess the severity of competition for water between ‘Edelweiss’ grapevines and neighboring permanent GC treatments. In year one (2014), the vineyard and GCs were established, where the GCs were planted immediately after the vines. Generally, GC treatments had lower Midday Leaf Water Potential (Ψ_md) than the herbicide sprayed control, however, none of the treatments exhibited even slight water stress between 2015 and 2017. Vine-GC competition was most apparent in the three years of pruning weights, where the most native grass GC treatment had an average of 158% lower weights than the control. Results suggest that planting specific groundcovers in both the alleyways and in-row areas of the vineyard during the first year of establishment can be overly detrimental to vine growth and causes reduced yields but other groundcovers can be a useful alternative to chemical weed control.

Published in	American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry (Volume 9, Issue 3)
DOI	10.11648/j.ajaf.20210903.16
Page(s)	131-140
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Grape, Vineyard, Groundcover

References

[1]	Baker, N. T. (2017). Estimated annual agricultural pesticide use by crop group for states of the conterminous united states, 1992-2014.
[2]	Fritschi, L., et al. (2015). Carcinogenicity of tetrachlorvinphos, parathion, malathion, diazinon, and glyphosate. The Lancet Oncology, 114 (16.5), 490-491.
[3]	Jayasumana, C., Gunatilake, S., & Senanayake, P. (2014). Glyphosate, hard water and nephrotoxic metals: Are they the culprits behind the epidemic of chronic kidney disease of unknown etiology in sri lanka? International journal of environmental research and public health, 11 (2), 2125-2147.
[4]	Lennartz, B., Louchart, X., Voltz, M., & Andrieux, P. (1997). Diuron and simazine losses to runoff water in mediterranean vineyards. Journal of Environmental Quality, 26 (6), 1493-1502.
[5]	Chahal, P. S., Varanasi, V. K., Jugulam, M., & Jhala, A. J. (2017). Glyphosate-resistant palmer amaranth (amaranthus palmeri) in nebraska: Confirmation, epsps gene amplification, and response to post corn and soybean herbicides. Weed Technology, 31 (1), 80-93.
[6]	Steenwerth, K., & Belina, K. (2008). Cover crops enhance soil organic matter, carbon dynamics and microbiological function in a vineyard agroecosystem. Applied soil ecology, 40 (2), 359-369.
[7]	Atucha, A., et al. (2013). Soil erosion, runoff and nutrient losses in an avocado (persea americana mill) hillside orchard under different groundcover management systems. Plant and soil, 368 (1-2), 393-406.
[8]	Blavet, D., et al. (2009). Effect of land use and management on the early stages of soil water erosion in french mediterranean vineyards. Soil and Tillage Research, 106 (1), 124-136.
[9]	Pool, R., Dunst, R., & Lakso, A. (1990). Comparison of sod, mulch, cultivation, and herbicide floor management practices for grape production in nonirrigated vineyards. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 115 (6), 872-877.
[10]	Tan, S., & Crabtree, G. D. (1990). Competition between perennial ryegrass sod and chardonnay'wine grapes for mineral nutrients. HortScience, 25 (5), 533-535.
[11]	Shaulis, N., & Steel, R. (1969). Interaction of resistant rootstock to the nitrogen, weed control, pruning and thinning effects on the productivity of concord grapevines. Proc Amer Soc Hort Sci,
[12]	Giese, G., Velasco-Cruz, C., Roberts, L., Heitman, J., & Wolf, T. K. (2014). Complete vineyard floor cover crops favorably limit grapevine vegetative growth. Scientia horticulturae, 170, 256-266.
[13]	Keller, M. (2015). The science of grapevines: Anatomy and morphology.
[14]	Dokoozlian, N., & Kliewer, W. (1995). The light environment within grapevine canopies. I. Description and seasonal changes during fruit development. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 46 (2), 209-218.
[15]	Chorti, E., Guidoni, S., Ferrandino, A., & Novello, V. (2010). Effect of different cluster sunlight exposure levels on ripening and anthocyanin accumulation in nebbiolo grapes. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 61 (1), 23-30.
[16]	Scheiner, J. J., Heuvel, J. E. V., Pan, B., & Sacks, G. L. (2011). Modeling impacts of viticultural and environmental factors on 3-isobutyl-2-methoxypyrazine in cabernet franc grapes. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, ajev. 2011.11002.
[17]	Byrne, M. E., & Howell, G. S. (1978). Initial response of baco noir grapevines to pruning severity, sucker removal, and weed control. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 29 (3), 192-198.
[18]	Austin, C. N., & Wilcox, W. F. (2011). Effects of fruit-zone leaf removal, training systems, and irrigation on the development of grapevine powdery mildew. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 62 (2), 193-198.
[19]	Smart, R., & Robinson, M. (1991). Sunlight into wine: A handbook for winegrape canopy management. Winetitles.
[20]	Bavougian, C. M. (2014). Groundcovers and mulches for sustainable vineyard floor management The University of Nebraska - Lincoln].
[21]	Bordelon, B. P., & Weller, S. C. (1997). Preplant cover crops affect weed and vine growth in first-year vineyards. HortScience, 32 (6), 1040-1043.
[22]	Loseke, B. A., Read, P. E., & Blankenship, E. E. (2015). Preventing spring freeze injury on grapevines using multiple applications of amigo oil and naphthaleneacetic acid. Scientia horticulturae, 193, 294-300.
[23]	Matthews, M. A., & Anderson, M. M. (1989). Reproductive development in grape (vitis vinifera l.): Responses to seasonal water deficits. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 40 (1), 52-60.
[24]	Reynolds, A. G., & Naylor, A. P. (1994). Pinot noir'andriesling'grapevines respond to water stress duration and soil water-holding capacity. HortScience, 29 (12), 1505-1510.
[25]	Ferreyra, E., Sellés, V., Ruiz, S., & Sellés, M. (2003). Efecto del estrés hídrico aplicado en distintos períodos de desarrollo de la vid cv. Chardonnay en la producción y calidad del vino. Agricultura Técnica, 63 (3), 277-286.
[26]	dos Santos, T. P., et al. (2003). Partial rootzone drying: Effects on growth and fruit quality of field-grown grapevines (vitis vinifera). Functional Plant Biology, 30 (6), 663-671.
[27]	Girona, J., et al. (2006). The use of midday leaf water potential for scheduling deficit irrigation in vineyards. Irrigation Science, 24 (2), 115-127.
[28]	Williams, L., Dokoozlian, N., & Wample, R. (1994). Handbook of environmental physiology of fruit crops. Vol i: Temperate crops.
[29]	Williams, L., & Araujo, F. (2002). Correlations among predawn leaf, midday leaf, and midday stem water potential and their correlations with other measures of soil and plant water status in vitis vinifera. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 127 (3), 448-454.
[30]	Choné, X., Van Leeuwen, C., Chéry, P., & Ribéreau-Gayon, P. (2001). Terroir influence on water status and nitrogen status of non-irrigated cabernet sauvignon (vitis vinifera). Vegetative development, must and wine composition (example of a medoc top estate vineyard, saint julien area, bordeaux, 1997). South African Journal of Enology Viticulture, 22 (1), 8-15.
[31]	Grimes, D., & Williams, L. (1990). Irrigation effects on plant water relations and productivity of thompson seedless grapevines. Crop Science, 30 (2), 255-260.
[32]	Dobrowski, S., Ustin, S., & Wolpert, J. (2003). Grapevine dormant pruning weight prediction using remotely sensed data. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, 9 (3), 177-182.
[33]	Dharmadhikari, M. R., & Wilker, K. L. (2001). Micro vinification: A practical guide to small scale wine production. Midwest Viticulture and Enology Center, Dept. of Fruit Science, Southwest Missouri State University.
[34]	Wolf, T. K. (2008). Wine grape production guide for eastern north america.
[35]	Brown, D. (2013). Soil sampling vineyards and guidelines for interpreting the soil test results. Michigan State University Extension. Retrieved 2/15/08 from http://msue.anr.msu.edu/news/soil_sampling_vineyards_and_guidelines_for_interpreting_the_soil_test_resul
[36]	Jackson, D., & Lombard, P. (1993). Environmental and management practices affecting grape composition and wine quality-a review. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 44 (4), 409-430.
[37]	Hayhoe, K., et al. (2007). Past and future changes in climate and hydrological indicators in the us northeast. Climate Dynamics, 28 (4), 381-407.
[38]	Poni, S., Lakso, A. N., Turner, J. R., & Melious, R. E. (1994). Interactions of crop level and late season water stress on growth and physiology of field-grown concord grapevines. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 45 (2), 252-258.
[39]	Bremer, D. J. (2003). Evaluation of microlysimeters used in turfgrass evapotranspiration studies using the dual-probe heat-pulse technique. Agronomy Journal, 95 (6), 1625-1632.
[40]	Celette, F., Gaudin, R., & Gary, C. (2008). Spatial and temporal changes to the water regime of a mediterranean vineyard due to the adoption of cover cropping. European Journal of Agronomy, 29 (4), 153-162.
[41]	Tesic, D., Keller, M., & Hutton, R. J. (2007). Influence of vineyard floor management practices on grapevine vegetative growth, yield, and fruit composition. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 58 (1), 1-11.
[42]	Bokhari, U. (1978). Allelopathy among prairie grasses and its possible ecological significance. Annals of Botany, 42 (1), 127-136.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Benjamin Allen Loseke, Paul Eugene Read, Stephen Joseph Gamet. (2021). Impact of Alleyway and In-row Planted Groundcovers in Midwestern Vineyard. American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 9(3), 131-140. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20210903.16

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Benjamin Allen Loseke; Paul Eugene Read; Stephen Joseph Gamet. Impact of Alleyway and In-row Planted Groundcovers in Midwestern Vineyard. Am. J. Agric. For. 2021, 9(3), 131-140. doi: 10.11648/j.ajaf.20210903.16

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Benjamin Allen Loseke, Paul Eugene Read, Stephen Joseph Gamet. Impact of Alleyway and In-row Planted Groundcovers in Midwestern Vineyard. Am J Agric For. 2021;9(3):131-140. doi: 10.11648/j.ajaf.20210903.16

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ajaf.20210903.16,
  author = {Benjamin Allen Loseke and Paul Eugene Read and Stephen Joseph Gamet},
  title = {Impact of Alleyway and In-row Planted Groundcovers in Midwestern Vineyard},
  journal = {American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry},
  volume = {9},
  number = {3},
  pages = {131-140},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ajaf.20210903.16},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20210903.16},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajaf.20210903.16},
  abstract = {In many Midwestern vineyards a one meter weed-free strip is maintained directly beneath the vines to reduce vine-weed competition. Conventionally, this strip has been conserved with repeated applications of herbicide, mainly glyphosate. The necessity for this weed-free strip to reduce vine-weed competition has been well documented in more arid climates. However, in areas with higher soil fertility and adequate rainfall grapevines can become overly vigorous and competition with a groundcover (GC) has been shown to be a useful tool to alleviate excess growth. Moreover, stand establishment and early vine growth have not been well documented when planting GC immediately following the vine planting. The main objective of this project was to assess the severity of competition for water between ‘Edelweiss’ grapevines and neighboring permanent GC treatments. In year one (2014), the vineyard and GCs were established, where the GCs were planted immediately after the vines. Generally, GC treatments had lower Midday Leaf Water Potential (Ψmd) than the herbicide sprayed control, however, none of the treatments exhibited even slight water stress between 2015 and 2017. Vine-GC competition was most apparent in the three years of pruning weights, where the most native grass GC treatment had an average of 158% lower weights than the control. Results suggest that planting specific groundcovers in both the alleyways and in-row areas of the vineyard during the first year of establishment can be overly detrimental to vine growth and causes reduced yields but other groundcovers can be a useful alternative to chemical weed control.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Impact of Alleyway and In-row Planted Groundcovers in Midwestern Vineyard
AU  - Benjamin Allen Loseke
AU  - Paul Eugene Read
AU  - Stephen Joseph Gamet
Y1  - 2021/05/27
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20210903.16
DO  - 10.11648/j.ajaf.20210903.16
T2  - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry
JF  - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry
JO  - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry
SP  - 131
EP  - 140
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2330-8591
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20210903.16
AB  - In many Midwestern vineyards a one meter weed-free strip is maintained directly beneath the vines to reduce vine-weed competition. Conventionally, this strip has been conserved with repeated applications of herbicide, mainly glyphosate. The necessity for this weed-free strip to reduce vine-weed competition has been well documented in more arid climates. However, in areas with higher soil fertility and adequate rainfall grapevines can become overly vigorous and competition with a groundcover (GC) has been shown to be a useful tool to alleviate excess growth. Moreover, stand establishment and early vine growth have not been well documented when planting GC immediately following the vine planting. The main objective of this project was to assess the severity of competition for water between ‘Edelweiss’ grapevines and neighboring permanent GC treatments. In year one (2014), the vineyard and GCs were established, where the GCs were planted immediately after the vines. Generally, GC treatments had lower Midday Leaf Water Potential (Ψmd) than the herbicide sprayed control, however, none of the treatments exhibited even slight water stress between 2015 and 2017. Vine-GC competition was most apparent in the three years of pruning weights, where the most native grass GC treatment had an average of 158% lower weights than the control. Results suggest that planting specific groundcovers in both the alleyways and in-row areas of the vineyard during the first year of establishment can be overly detrimental to vine growth and causes reduced yields but other groundcovers can be a useful alternative to chemical weed control.
VL  - 9
IS  - 3
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Benjamin Allen Loseke

Department of Agronomy & Horticulture, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA
Paul Eugene Read

Department of Agronomy & Horticulture, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA
Stephen Joseph Gamet

Department of Agronomy & Horticulture, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Benjamin Allen Loseke, Paul Eugene Read, Stephen Joseph Gamet. (2021). Impact of Alleyway and In-row Planted Groundcovers in Midwestern Vineyard. American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 9(3), 131-140. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20210903.16

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Benjamin Allen Loseke; Paul Eugene Read; Stephen Joseph Gamet. Impact of Alleyway and In-row Planted Groundcovers in Midwestern Vineyard. Am. J. Agric. For. 2021, 9(3), 131-140. doi: 10.11648/j.ajaf.20210903.16

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Benjamin Allen Loseke, Paul Eugene Read, Stephen Joseph Gamet. Impact of Alleyway and In-row Planted Groundcovers in Midwestern Vineyard. Am J Agric For. 2021;9(3):131-140. doi: 10.11648/j.ajaf.20210903.16

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ajaf.20210903.16,
  author = {Benjamin Allen Loseke and Paul Eugene Read and Stephen Joseph Gamet},
  title = {Impact of Alleyway and In-row Planted Groundcovers in Midwestern Vineyard},
  journal = {American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry},
  volume = {9},
  number = {3},
  pages = {131-140},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ajaf.20210903.16},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20210903.16},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajaf.20210903.16},
  abstract = {In many Midwestern vineyards a one meter weed-free strip is maintained directly beneath the vines to reduce vine-weed competition. Conventionally, this strip has been conserved with repeated applications of herbicide, mainly glyphosate. The necessity for this weed-free strip to reduce vine-weed competition has been well documented in more arid climates. However, in areas with higher soil fertility and adequate rainfall grapevines can become overly vigorous and competition with a groundcover (GC) has been shown to be a useful tool to alleviate excess growth. Moreover, stand establishment and early vine growth have not been well documented when planting GC immediately following the vine planting. The main objective of this project was to assess the severity of competition for water between ‘Edelweiss’ grapevines and neighboring permanent GC treatments. In year one (2014), the vineyard and GCs were established, where the GCs were planted immediately after the vines. Generally, GC treatments had lower Midday Leaf Water Potential (Ψmd) than the herbicide sprayed control, however, none of the treatments exhibited even slight water stress between 2015 and 2017. Vine-GC competition was most apparent in the three years of pruning weights, where the most native grass GC treatment had an average of 158% lower weights than the control. Results suggest that planting specific groundcovers in both the alleyways and in-row areas of the vineyard during the first year of establishment can be overly detrimental to vine growth and causes reduced yields but other groundcovers can be a useful alternative to chemical weed control.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Impact of Alleyway and In-row Planted Groundcovers in Midwestern Vineyard
AU  - Benjamin Allen Loseke
AU  - Paul Eugene Read
AU  - Stephen Joseph Gamet
Y1  - 2021/05/27
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20210903.16
DO  - 10.11648/j.ajaf.20210903.16
T2  - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry
JF  - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry
JO  - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry
SP  - 131
EP  - 140
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2330-8591
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20210903.16
AB  - In many Midwestern vineyards a one meter weed-free strip is maintained directly beneath the vines to reduce vine-weed competition. Conventionally, this strip has been conserved with repeated applications of herbicide, mainly glyphosate. The necessity for this weed-free strip to reduce vine-weed competition has been well documented in more arid climates. However, in areas with higher soil fertility and adequate rainfall grapevines can become overly vigorous and competition with a groundcover (GC) has been shown to be a useful tool to alleviate excess growth. Moreover, stand establishment and early vine growth have not been well documented when planting GC immediately following the vine planting. The main objective of this project was to assess the severity of competition for water between ‘Edelweiss’ grapevines and neighboring permanent GC treatments. In year one (2014), the vineyard and GCs were established, where the GCs were planted immediately after the vines. Generally, GC treatments had lower Midday Leaf Water Potential (Ψmd) than the herbicide sprayed control, however, none of the treatments exhibited even slight water stress between 2015 and 2017. Vine-GC competition was most apparent in the three years of pruning weights, where the most native grass GC treatment had an average of 158% lower weights than the control. Results suggest that planting specific groundcovers in both the alleyways and in-row areas of the vineyard during the first year of establishment can be overly detrimental to vine growth and causes reduced yields but other groundcovers can be a useful alternative to chemical weed control.
VL  - 9
IS  - 3
ER  -

Copy | Download