Irrigation scheduling is a critical management input to ensure adequate soil moisture for optimum plant growth, yield, quality, water use efficiency, and economic return. Besides farmer irrigation practice including irrigation scheduling in Northwest Ethiopia is cultural. The objective of this study was to evaluate CROPWAT irrigation scheduling for hot pepper and water use efficiency through on-farm participatory approaches Northwest Ethiopia. The experiment was conducted at two sites in Awi Zone, Dangela district (Ligaba) and Jawe district (Wobomariam), Northwest Ethiopia for two consecutive years 2017 and 2018. The experimental design was used a paired ‘t’ design it compares the effects of CROPWAT8 irrigation scheduling versus farmer's irrigation practice under both the furrow irrigation system. From January to May irrigation season gross irrigation depth for hot pepper considering field irrigation application efficiency of 60% was 466.4 and 720.2 for Ligaba and Wobomariam site respectively. The paired ‘t’ analysis revealed that water use efficiency and hot pepper fresh yield were significantly increased under the CROPWAT8 irrigation scheduling practice as compared with farmers irrigation practice. Hot pepper water use efficiency was improved by 43.7% and 9%%, and hot pepper fresh yield was improved by 12% and 31.4% for Ligaba (high land) and Wobomariam (low Land) areas of Northwest Ethiopia. In addition to this participant farmers and stakeholders also evaluate CROPWAT irrigation scheduling positively it could be used locality conditions. This shows the CROPWAT8 irrigation scheduling has increased significant benefits (proper water usage and hot pepper fresh yield increment). We conclude that the CROPWAT irrigation scheduling system is a promising technology to estimate crop water and irrigation water requirements with when and how much irrigate to corresponding growth stage. And also, that can improve hot pepper fresh yield of small-scale irrigation in Northwest Ethiopia.
Published in | American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry (Volume 9, Issue 4) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ajaf.20210904.15 |
Page(s) | 189-200 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group |
CROPWAT Irrigation Scheduling, Farmer’s Irrigation Practice, Northwest Ethiopia
[1] | MoFED, E., Ethiopia: Building on progress a plan for accelerated and sustained development to end poverty (pasdep), 2006, Addis Ababa: The Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia Ministry of Finance …. |
[2] | Makombe, G., D. Kelemework, and D. Aredo, A comparative analysis of rainfed and irrigated agricultural production in Ethiopia. Irrigation and Drainage Systems, 2007. 21 (1): p. 35-44. |
[3] | Ewonetu, G., Identifing Major Constraints of Ground Water Use for Irrigated Crop Production: Fogera Plain, North Western Ethiopia, 2012, Cornell University. |
[4] | Beshir, S., Review on estimation of crop water requirement, irrigation frequency and water use efficiency of cabbage production. Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection, 2017. 5 (07): p. 59. |
[5] | Stevens, J. B., Adoption of irrigatio scheduling methods in South Africa, 2007, University of Pretoria. |
[6] | Nikolaou, G., et al., Implementing sustainable irrigation in water-scarce regions under the impact of climate change. Agronomy, 2020. 10 (8): p. 1120. |
[7] | Raine, S., et al., Soil–water and solute movement under precision irrigation: knowledge gaps for managing sustainable root zones. Irrigation Science, 2007. 26 (1): p. 91-100. |
[8] | Smith, M., CROPWAT: A computer program for irrigation planning and management. 1992: Food & Agriculture Org. |
[9] | Simonne, E., M. Dukes, and D. Haman, Principles and practices of irrigation management for vegetables. EDIS, 2006. 2006 (3). |
[10] | Howell, T. Irrigation scheduling research and its impact on water use. in Evapotranspiration and irrigation scheduling, Proceedings of the international conference. 1996. American Society of Agricultural Engineer St. Joseph, MI. |
[11] | Kharrou, M. H., et al., Water use efficiency and yield of winter wheat under different irrigation regimes in a semi-arid region. Agricultural Sciences in China, 2011. 2 (03): p. 273-282. |
[12] | Evans, R. G. and E. J. Sadler, Methods and technologies to improve efficiency of water use. Water resources research, 2008. 44 (7). |
[13] | Ismail, S. M. and K. Ozawa. Effect of irrigation interval on growth characteristics, plant water stress tolerance and water use efficiency for Chile pepper. in Thirteenth International Water Technology Conference, IWTC. 2009. |
[14] | Jones, H. Irrigation scheduling–comparison of soil, plant and atmosphere monitoring approaches. in V International Symposium on Irrigation of Horticultural Crops 792. 2006. |
[15] | Strelkoff, T., et al., Surface-irrigation evaluation models: Application to level basins in Egypt. Transactions of the ASAE, 1999. 42 (4): p. 1027. |
[16] | Allen, R. G., et al., Crop evapotranspiration-Guidelines for computing crop water requirements-FAO Irrigation and drainage paper 56. Fao, Rome, 1998. 300 (9): p. D05109. |
[17] | Zayzay Jr, J. B., Validation of the fao aquacrop model for irrigated hot pepper (capsicum frustescensvarlegon 18) in the coastal savannah ecological zone of Ghana, 2015, University of Cape Coast. |
[18] | Sayyari, M. and F. Ghanbari, Effects of super absorbent polymer A200 on the growth, yield and some physiological responses in sweet pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) under various irrigation regimes. International Journal of Agricultural and Food Research, 2012. 1 (1). |
[19] | Antonious, G. F., J. E. Meyer, and J. C. Snyder, Toxicity and repellency of hot pepper extracts to spider mite, Tetranychus urticae Koch. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part B, 2006. 41 (8): p. 1383-1391. |
[20] | Dorji, K., M. Behboudian, and J. Zegbe-Dominguez, Water relations, growth, yield, and fruit quality of hot pepper under deficit irrigation and partial rootzone drying. Scientia Horticulturae, 2005. 104 (2): p. 137-149. |
[21] | Saaty, T. L., Relative measurement and its generalization in decision making why pairwise comparisons are central in mathematics for the measurement of intangible factors the analytic hierarchy/network process. RACSAM-Revista de la Real Academia de Ciencias Exactas, Fisicas y Naturales. Serie A. Matematicas, 2008. 102 (2): p. 251-318. |
[22] | De Winter, J. C., Using the Student's t-test with extremely small sample sizes. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 2013. 18 (1): p. 10. |
[23] | Yimam, A. Y., et al., Experimental evaluation for the impacts of conservation agriculture with drip irrigation on crop coefficient and soil properties in the sub-humid Ethiopian highlands. Water, 2020. 12 (4): p. 947. |
[24] | Belay, S. A., et al., The Response of Water and Nutrient Dynamics and of Crop Yield to Cona servation Agriculture in the Ethiopian Highlands. Sustainability, 2020. 12 (15): p. 5989. |
[25] | Assefa, T., et al., Experimental Evaluation of Conservation Agriculture with Drip Irrigation for Water Productivity in Sub-Saharan Africa. Water, 2019. 11 (3): p. 530. |
[26] | Zotarelli, L., et al., Step by step calculation of the Penman-Monteith Evapotranspiration (FAO-56 Method). Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences. University of Florida, 2010. |
[27] | Bos, M. G., et al., Water requirements for irrigation and the environment. 2008: Springer Science & Business Media. |
[28] | Doorenbos, J. and W. Pruitt, Crop water requirements. FAO Irrigation and drainage paper No. 24. FAO, Rome, 1977: p. 34-37. |
[29] | Savva, A. P. and K. Frenken, Crop water requirements and irrigation scheduling. Irrigation manual module 4. Water Resources Development and Management Officers, FAO, Sub-Regional Office for East and Southern Africa, 2002. |
[30] | Markos, D. and S. Mekonen, Effects of Inter and Intra Row Spacing on Growth and Yield Components of Hot Pepper. |
[31] | Salau, A. W., et al., Growth and fruit yield of pepper species as affected by plant spacing. International Journal of Vegetable Science, 2019. 25 (2): p. 164-175. |
[32] | Ewaid, S. H., S. A. Abed, and N. Al-Ansari, Crop water requirements and irrigation schedules for some major crops in Southern Iraq. Water, 2019. 11 (4): p. 756. |
[33] | Alemayehu, Y., J. M. Steyn, and J. G. Annandale, FAO-type crop factor determination for irrigation scheduling of hot pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) cultivars. South African Journal of Plant and Soil, 2009. 26 (3): p. 186-194. |
[34] | Mamo, A., Technical and Economical Feasibility of Small Holder Drip Irrigation using Harvested Rainwater for Onion Production at Dire Dawa, 2005, MSc. Thesis, Alamaya University, Ethiopia. |
[35] | Savva, A. P. and K. Frenken, Crop water requirements and irrigation scheduling. 2002: FAO Sub-Regional Office for East and Southern Africa Harare. |
[36] | Hargreaves, G. L., G. H. Hargreaves, and J. P. Riley, Irrigation water requirements for Senegal River basin. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 1985. 111 (3): p. 265-275. |
[37] | GENÇOĞLAN, C. and A. YAZAR, The effects of deficit irrigations on corn yield and water use efficiency. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 1999. 23 (2): p. 233-242. |
[38] | Erdem, Y., et al., Irrigation scheduling for watermelon with crop water stress index (CWSI). Journal of Central European Agriculture, 2005. 6 (4): p. 449-460. |
APA Style
Temesgen Fentahun Adametie, Demeke Tamene Mitku. (2021). Experimental Evaluations of CROPWAT8 Irrigation Scheduling for Hot Pepper and WUE Through on-Farm Participatory Approaches, Northwest Ethiopia. American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 9(4), 189-200. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20210904.15
ACS Style
Temesgen Fentahun Adametie; Demeke Tamene Mitku. Experimental Evaluations of CROPWAT8 Irrigation Scheduling for Hot Pepper and WUE Through on-Farm Participatory Approaches, Northwest Ethiopia. Am. J. Agric. For. 2021, 9(4), 189-200. doi: 10.11648/j.ajaf.20210904.15
AMA Style
Temesgen Fentahun Adametie, Demeke Tamene Mitku. Experimental Evaluations of CROPWAT8 Irrigation Scheduling for Hot Pepper and WUE Through on-Farm Participatory Approaches, Northwest Ethiopia. Am J Agric For. 2021;9(4):189-200. doi: 10.11648/j.ajaf.20210904.15
@article{10.11648/j.ajaf.20210904.15, author = {Temesgen Fentahun Adametie and Demeke Tamene Mitku}, title = {Experimental Evaluations of CROPWAT8 Irrigation Scheduling for Hot Pepper and WUE Through on-Farm Participatory Approaches, Northwest Ethiopia}, journal = {American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry}, volume = {9}, number = {4}, pages = {189-200}, doi = {10.11648/j.ajaf.20210904.15}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20210904.15}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajaf.20210904.15}, abstract = {Irrigation scheduling is a critical management input to ensure adequate soil moisture for optimum plant growth, yield, quality, water use efficiency, and economic return. Besides farmer irrigation practice including irrigation scheduling in Northwest Ethiopia is cultural. The objective of this study was to evaluate CROPWAT irrigation scheduling for hot pepper and water use efficiency through on-farm participatory approaches Northwest Ethiopia. The experiment was conducted at two sites in Awi Zone, Dangela district (Ligaba) and Jawe district (Wobomariam), Northwest Ethiopia for two consecutive years 2017 and 2018. The experimental design was used a paired ‘t’ design it compares the effects of CROPWAT8 irrigation scheduling versus farmer's irrigation practice under both the furrow irrigation system. From January to May irrigation season gross irrigation depth for hot pepper considering field irrigation application efficiency of 60% was 466.4 and 720.2 for Ligaba and Wobomariam site respectively. The paired ‘t’ analysis revealed that water use efficiency and hot pepper fresh yield were significantly increased under the CROPWAT8 irrigation scheduling practice as compared with farmers irrigation practice. Hot pepper water use efficiency was improved by 43.7% and 9%%, and hot pepper fresh yield was improved by 12% and 31.4% for Ligaba (high land) and Wobomariam (low Land) areas of Northwest Ethiopia. In addition to this participant farmers and stakeholders also evaluate CROPWAT irrigation scheduling positively it could be used locality conditions. This shows the CROPWAT8 irrigation scheduling has increased significant benefits (proper water usage and hot pepper fresh yield increment). We conclude that the CROPWAT irrigation scheduling system is a promising technology to estimate crop water and irrigation water requirements with when and how much irrigate to corresponding growth stage. And also, that can improve hot pepper fresh yield of small-scale irrigation in Northwest Ethiopia.}, year = {2021} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Experimental Evaluations of CROPWAT8 Irrigation Scheduling for Hot Pepper and WUE Through on-Farm Participatory Approaches, Northwest Ethiopia AU - Temesgen Fentahun Adametie AU - Demeke Tamene Mitku Y1 - 2021/07/06 PY - 2021 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20210904.15 DO - 10.11648/j.ajaf.20210904.15 T2 - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry JF - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry JO - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry SP - 189 EP - 200 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-8591 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20210904.15 AB - Irrigation scheduling is a critical management input to ensure adequate soil moisture for optimum plant growth, yield, quality, water use efficiency, and economic return. Besides farmer irrigation practice including irrigation scheduling in Northwest Ethiopia is cultural. The objective of this study was to evaluate CROPWAT irrigation scheduling for hot pepper and water use efficiency through on-farm participatory approaches Northwest Ethiopia. The experiment was conducted at two sites in Awi Zone, Dangela district (Ligaba) and Jawe district (Wobomariam), Northwest Ethiopia for two consecutive years 2017 and 2018. The experimental design was used a paired ‘t’ design it compares the effects of CROPWAT8 irrigation scheduling versus farmer's irrigation practice under both the furrow irrigation system. From January to May irrigation season gross irrigation depth for hot pepper considering field irrigation application efficiency of 60% was 466.4 and 720.2 for Ligaba and Wobomariam site respectively. The paired ‘t’ analysis revealed that water use efficiency and hot pepper fresh yield were significantly increased under the CROPWAT8 irrigation scheduling practice as compared with farmers irrigation practice. Hot pepper water use efficiency was improved by 43.7% and 9%%, and hot pepper fresh yield was improved by 12% and 31.4% for Ligaba (high land) and Wobomariam (low Land) areas of Northwest Ethiopia. In addition to this participant farmers and stakeholders also evaluate CROPWAT irrigation scheduling positively it could be used locality conditions. This shows the CROPWAT8 irrigation scheduling has increased significant benefits (proper water usage and hot pepper fresh yield increment). We conclude that the CROPWAT irrigation scheduling system is a promising technology to estimate crop water and irrigation water requirements with when and how much irrigate to corresponding growth stage. And also, that can improve hot pepper fresh yield of small-scale irrigation in Northwest Ethiopia. VL - 9 IS - 4 ER -