Review on Windbreaks Agroforestry as a Climate Smart Agriculture Practices

Ibsa Dawid Mume; Sisay Workalemahu

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ajaf.20210906.12

| Peer-Reviewed

Review on Windbreaks Agroforestry as a Climate Smart Agriculture Practices

Ibsa Dawid Mume, Sisay Workalemahu

Published in American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry (Volume 9, Issue 6)

Received: 16 October 2021 Accepted: 11 November 2021 Published: 17 November 2021

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

Nowadays, climate variability and changes are among the main environmental challenge within the world. The negative implication of global climate change on the agricultural sector is unequivocal, as its consequences affect the livelihoods of particularly smallholder farmers within the tropics. Windbreaks agroforestry practices has been offered as a climate smart agriculture technologies or practices to reduce the global climate variability and climate change. It is one of the most important adaptation and mitigation strategies of climate change. This review paper focuses on the importance of windbreaks agroforestry practices in global climate change adaptation and mitigation, the role of windbreak technology at the farm and landscape levels, effects of windbreaks on reduction wind speed and soil protection, role of windbreaks to reduce the vulnerability of climate change. Windbreaks can improve the efficiency of ecological and ecosystem services provided by natural resource. If planned properly, nitrogen-fixing trees also can provide direct benefits for increasing the productivity of agricultural crops in an organic way and by resulting higher yields. They enhance animal health, feed efficiency, reduce smells, and increase producers' economic returns when utilized in livestock production systems. Windbreaks can help boost crop productivity, diversify goods, and lift farm revenue by improving soil quality and reducing erosion, improving water quality and reducing flooding damage, improving animal habitat and biodiversity, and lowering pest control inputs. Within the final section, the precise challenges to adapting windbreaks agroforestry practices and adoption mechanisms were reviewed. Windbreaks agroforestry systems may prove to be very useful component of agricultural adaptation as both an economically feasible adaptation strategy for smallholder farmers vulnerable to climate change as well as a profitable greenhouse gas mitigation opportunity.

Published in	American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry (Volume 9, Issue 6)
DOI	10.11648/j.ajaf.20210906.12
Page(s)	342-347
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Adoption Mechanisms, Climate Change, Climate Smart Agriculture, Windbreaks Agroforestry

References

[1]	Workman, S. W., Bannister, M. E., Nair, P. K. R., 2003. Agroforestry potential in the southeastern United States: perceptions of landowners and extension professionals. Agrofor. Syst. 59, 73–83. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026193204801.
[2]	Schoeneberger, M. M., Bentrup, G., Patel-Weynand, T., 2017. Agroforestry: Enhancing resiliency in U.S. agricultural landscapes under changing conditions. In: USDA Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rep. WO-96, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.2737/WO-GTR-96, 213.
[3]	UM (University of Minnesota), 2012: Selecting Trees& Shrubs in Windbreaks. Minnesota, USA.
[4]	USDA, 1997: Windbreak/Shelterbelt, Conservation Practice Job Sheet. Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), USA.
[5]	FAO 1989: Title: Arid Zone Forestry: A Guide for Field Technicians. ISBN 92-5-102809-5, Delle Terme di Caracalla, 00100 Rome, Italy.
[6]	Hand, A. M., Bowman, T., Tyndall, J. C., 2019. Influences on farmer and rancher interest in supplying woody biomass for energy in the US Northern Great Plains. Agrofor. Syst. 93, 731–744. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-017-0170-x.
[7]	Brandle, J. R., Hodges, L. and Zhou, X. H., 2004. Windbreaks in North American agricultural systems. In New vistas in agroforestry (65-78). Springer, Dordrecht.
[8]	Osorio, R. J., Barden, C. J. and Ciampitti, I. A., 2019. GIS approach to estimate windbreak crop yield effects in Kansas–Nebraska. Agroforestry Systems, 93 (4), 1567-1576.
[9]	Tamang, B., Andreu, M. G., & Rockwood, D. L. (2010). Microclimate patterns on the leeside of single-row tree windbreaks during different weather conditions in Florida farms: implications for improved crop production. Agroforestry Systems, 79 (1), 111-122.
[10]	Hendrickson, R., 2015. Winter starts today. Bee Cult. 143, 48–54.
[11]	Hennessy, G., Harris, C., Eaton, C., Wright, P., Jackson, E., et. al. 2020. Gone with the wind: effects of wind on honeybee visit rate and foraging behavior. Anim. Behav. 161, 23–31. Https: //doi.org/10.1016/j. anbehav.2019.12.018.
[12]	Catacutan, D. C., Van Noordwijk, M., Nguyen, T. H., Öborn, I. and Mercado, A. R., 2017. Agroforestry: contribution to food security and climate-change adaptation and mitigation in Southeast Asia. White Paper. Bogor, Indonesia: World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) Southeast Asia Regional Program.
[13]	Van Noordwijk, M., Bayala, J., Hairiah, K., Lusiana, B., Muthuri, C., et. al. 2014. Agroforestry solutions for buffering climate variability and adapting to change. Climate Change Impact and Adaptation in Agricultural Systems; Fuhrer, J., Gregory, PJ, Eds, 216-232.
[14]	Roshetko, J. M.; Mercado, A. R.; Martini, E.; Prameswari, D. Agroforestry in the Uplands of Southeast Asia. Policy Brief no. 77. Agroforestry Options for ASEAN Series no. 5; World Agroforestry (ICRAF) Southeast Asia Regional Program: Bogor, Indonesia, 2017; Available online: http://www.awg-sf.org/www2/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/ANNEX-10.-PB5-Upland-AF-in-SEA.pdf/ (accessed on 27 October 2020).
[15]	Wright, B. and Stuhr, K. (2002) ‘Windbreaks: An agroforestry practice’, USDA National Agroforestry Center, AF Note-25, 1–4.
[16]	Peters, S. M. and Hodge, S. S. (2000) ‘Agroforestry - An integration of land use practices’, 12.
[17]	Janeček M., Dostál T., Kozlovsky-Dufková J., and Dumbrov-ský M., Hůla J., et al., (2012): Erosion Control in the Czech Republic–Handbook. Prague, Czech University of Life Sciences. (In Czech).
[18]	Jackson, D. L., and L. L. Jackson (Ed.). 2002. The farm as natural habitat—reconnecting food systems with ecosystems. Island Press, Washington, DC.
[19]	Kucera, J. et al. (2020) ‘The effect of windbreak parameters on the wind erosion risk assessment in agricultural landscape’, Journal of Ecological Engineering, 21 (2), 150–156. doi: 10.12911/22998993/116323.
[20]	Reháček, D. et al. (2017) ‘Effect of windbreaks on wind speed reduction and soil protection against wind erosion’, Soil and Water Research, 12 (2), 128–135. doi: 10.17221/45/2016-SWR.
[21]	Podhrázská, J. et al. (2021) ‘Functions of windbreaks in the landscape ecological network and methods of their evaluation’, Forests, 12 (1), 1–16. doi: 10.3390/f12010067.
[22]	Alemu, M. M. (2016) ‘Ecological Benefits of Trees as Windbreaks and Shelterbelts’, 6 (1), 10–13. doi: 10.5923/j.ije.20160601.02.
[23]	Smith, M. M., Bentrup, G., Kellerman, T., MacFarland, K., Straight, R. and Ameyaw, L., 2021. Windbreaks in the United States: A systematic review of producer-reported benefits, challenges, management activities and drivers of adoption. Agricultural Systems, 187,.103032.
[24]	Richard Straight and James Brandle, 2007: Windbreak Density: Rules Of Thumb for Design. USDA, National Agroforestry Center, North 38th, Street & East Campus Loop, UNL–East Campus, Lincoln, Nebraska 68586-0822.
[25]	SDDA (South Dakota Dept. of Agriculture), 2013: South Dakota’s Forest. Resource Conservation and Forestry Division, 523 East Capitol, Pierre, SD 57501.
[26]	Melissa J. Santiago and Amanda D. Rodewald, 2004: Shelterbelts for Wildlife. School of Natural Resources, the Ohio State University.
[27]	SDDA (South Dakota Dept. of Agriculture), 2007: Windbreaks for Wildlife. Resource Conservation and Forestry Division, 523 East Capitol, Pierre, SD 57501.
[28]	Lin BB. 2011. Agroforestry adaptation and mitigation options for smallholder farmers vulnerable to climate change. CSIRO Climate Adaptation Flagship, PMB 1 Aspendale VIC (3195) Australia.
[29]	Lin BB 2007 Agroforestry management as an adaptive strategy against potential microclimate extremes in coffee agriculture. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 144, 85-94.
[30]	Méndez VE, Bacon CM, Olson M, Morris KS, Shattuck AK 2010 Agrobiodiversity and shade coffee smallholder livelihoods: A review and synthesis of ten years of research in Central America. Special Focus Section on Geographic Contributions to Agrobiodiversity Research. Professional Geographer. 62, 357-376.
[31]	Verchot L, Van Noordwijk M, Kandji S, Tomich T, Ong C, Albrecht A, Mackensen J, Bantilan C, and Anupama KV, Palm C 2007 Climate change: linking adaptation and mitigation through agroforestry. Mitigation & Adaptation Strategy for Global Change, 12, 901-918.
[32]	Albrecht A, Kandji ST 2003 Carbon sequestration in tropical agroforestry systems. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 99, 15-27.
[33]	Montagnini F, Nair PKR 2004 Carbon sequestration: An underexploited environmental benefit of agroforestry systems. Agroforestry Systems, 61, 281-295.
[34]	Antle JM, Stoorvogel JJ, and Valdivia RO. 2007: Assessing the economic impacts of agricultural carbon sequestration: Terraces and agroforestry in the Peruvian Andes. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 122: 435-445.
[35]	Schoeneberger M, Bendrub G, Gooijer H, Soolanayakanahal R, Tom Sauer et al. 2012. Branching out: agroforestry as a climate change mitigation and adaptation for agriculture. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 67 (5): 128-136.
[36]	UNFCCC, 2013. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change https://cdm.unfccc.Int/methodologies/index.Html
[37]	Thomas, G. W. (1990). Sustainable Agriculture: Timely Thrust for International Development. Paper presented to the Division of Agriculture, National Association of State Universities and Land-Grant Colleges, Washington, D.C., USA.
[38]	Nath, A. J. and Das, A. K. (2012). Carbon pool and sequestration potential of village bamboos in agroforestry systems in Northeast India. Tropical Ecology. 53 (3): 287-93.
[39]	Kiyani, P., J. Andoh, Y. Lee and Lee, D. K. (2017). Benefits and challenges of agroforestry adoption: a case of Musebeya sector, Nyamagabe District in the southern province of Rwanda. Forest Science and Technology. 13 (4): 174-180. DOI: 10.1080/21580103.2017.1392367.
[40]	Holland, M. B., Free de Koning, M. Morales, L. Naughton-Treves, Brian, E., Robinson and L. Suárez. (2014). Complex Tenure and Deforestation: Implications for Conservation Incentives in the Ecuadorian Amazon. World Development. 55 (C): 21-36.
[41]	Weil, R. R. and Brady, N. C. (2016). Prospects for Global Soil Quality as Affected by Human Activities. In: The Nature and Properties of Soils. [(Eds.) Weil, R]. Edi. 15^th, Chapter: 20, Pearson Prentice Hall. 982-1040.
[42]	Rioux, J. (2011). Opportunities and Challenges of Promoting Agro--forestry for Climate Change Mitigation: A Case study of the Mitigation of Climate Change in Agriculture (MICCA) Pilot Project in Tanzania. Nature and Faune. 26 (2): 63-68.
[43]	FAO (Food and Agricultural Organization). (2016). State of the World’s Forests. Forests and Agriculture: Land-use Challenges and Opportunities. Rome.
[44]	Roshetko, J. M., Lasco, R. D. and Angeles, M. S. D. (2007). Smallholder agroforestry systems for carbon storage. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change. 12: 219-242.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Ibsa Dawid Mume, Sisay Workalemahu. (2021). Review on Windbreaks Agroforestry as a Climate Smart Agriculture Practices. American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 9(6), 342-347. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20210906.12

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Ibsa Dawid Mume; Sisay Workalemahu. Review on Windbreaks Agroforestry as a Climate Smart Agriculture Practices. Am. J. Agric. For. 2021, 9(6), 342-347. doi: 10.11648/j.ajaf.20210906.12

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Ibsa Dawid Mume, Sisay Workalemahu. Review on Windbreaks Agroforestry as a Climate Smart Agriculture Practices. Am J Agric For. 2021;9(6):342-347. doi: 10.11648/j.ajaf.20210906.12

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ajaf.20210906.12,
  author = {Ibsa Dawid Mume and Sisay Workalemahu},
  title = {Review on Windbreaks Agroforestry as a Climate Smart Agriculture Practices},
  journal = {American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry},
  volume = {9},
  number = {6},
  pages = {342-347},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ajaf.20210906.12},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20210906.12},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajaf.20210906.12},
  abstract = {Nowadays, climate variability and changes are among the main environmental challenge within the world. The negative implication of global climate change on the agricultural sector is unequivocal, as its consequences affect the livelihoods of particularly smallholder farmers within the tropics. Windbreaks agroforestry practices has been offered as a climate smart agriculture technologies or practices to reduce the global climate variability and climate change. It is one of the most important adaptation and mitigation strategies of climate change. This review paper focuses on the importance of windbreaks agroforestry practices in global climate change adaptation and mitigation, the role of windbreak technology at the farm and landscape levels, effects of windbreaks on reduction wind speed and soil protection, role of windbreaks to reduce the vulnerability of climate change. Windbreaks can improve the efficiency of ecological and ecosystem services provided by natural resource. If planned properly, nitrogen-fixing trees also can provide direct benefits for increasing the productivity of agricultural crops in an organic way and by resulting higher yields. They enhance animal health, feed efficiency, reduce smells, and increase producers' economic returns when utilized in livestock production systems. Windbreaks can help boost crop productivity, diversify goods, and lift farm revenue by improving soil quality and reducing erosion, improving water quality and reducing flooding damage, improving animal habitat and biodiversity, and lowering pest control inputs. Within the final section, the precise challenges to adapting windbreaks agroforestry practices and adoption mechanisms were reviewed. Windbreaks agroforestry systems may prove to be very useful component of agricultural adaptation as both an economically feasible adaptation strategy for smallholder farmers vulnerable to climate change as well as a profitable greenhouse gas mitigation opportunity.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Review on Windbreaks Agroforestry as a Climate Smart Agriculture Practices
AU  - Ibsa Dawid Mume
AU  - Sisay Workalemahu
Y1  - 2021/11/17
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20210906.12
DO  - 10.11648/j.ajaf.20210906.12
T2  - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry
JF  - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry
JO  - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry
SP  - 342
EP  - 347
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2330-8591
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20210906.12
AB  - Nowadays, climate variability and changes are among the main environmental challenge within the world. The negative implication of global climate change on the agricultural sector is unequivocal, as its consequences affect the livelihoods of particularly smallholder farmers within the tropics. Windbreaks agroforestry practices has been offered as a climate smart agriculture technologies or practices to reduce the global climate variability and climate change. It is one of the most important adaptation and mitigation strategies of climate change. This review paper focuses on the importance of windbreaks agroforestry practices in global climate change adaptation and mitigation, the role of windbreak technology at the farm and landscape levels, effects of windbreaks on reduction wind speed and soil protection, role of windbreaks to reduce the vulnerability of climate change. Windbreaks can improve the efficiency of ecological and ecosystem services provided by natural resource. If planned properly, nitrogen-fixing trees also can provide direct benefits for increasing the productivity of agricultural crops in an organic way and by resulting higher yields. They enhance animal health, feed efficiency, reduce smells, and increase producers' economic returns when utilized in livestock production systems. Windbreaks can help boost crop productivity, diversify goods, and lift farm revenue by improving soil quality and reducing erosion, improving water quality and reducing flooding damage, improving animal habitat and biodiversity, and lowering pest control inputs. Within the final section, the precise challenges to adapting windbreaks agroforestry practices and adoption mechanisms were reviewed. Windbreaks agroforestry systems may prove to be very useful component of agricultural adaptation as both an economically feasible adaptation strategy for smallholder farmers vulnerable to climate change as well as a profitable greenhouse gas mitigation opportunity.
VL  - 9
IS  - 6
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Ibsa Dawid Mume

Socioeconomics Research Team, Asella Agricultural Engineering Research Center, Oromia Agricultural Research Institute, Asella, Ethiopia
Sisay Workalemahu

Climate Smart Agriculture, Haramaya University, Haramaya, Ethiopia

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Ibsa Dawid Mume, Sisay Workalemahu. (2021). Review on Windbreaks Agroforestry as a Climate Smart Agriculture Practices. American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 9(6), 342-347. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20210906.12

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Ibsa Dawid Mume; Sisay Workalemahu. Review on Windbreaks Agroforestry as a Climate Smart Agriculture Practices. Am. J. Agric. For. 2021, 9(6), 342-347. doi: 10.11648/j.ajaf.20210906.12

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Ibsa Dawid Mume, Sisay Workalemahu. Review on Windbreaks Agroforestry as a Climate Smart Agriculture Practices. Am J Agric For. 2021;9(6):342-347. doi: 10.11648/j.ajaf.20210906.12

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ajaf.20210906.12,
  author = {Ibsa Dawid Mume and Sisay Workalemahu},
  title = {Review on Windbreaks Agroforestry as a Climate Smart Agriculture Practices},
  journal = {American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry},
  volume = {9},
  number = {6},
  pages = {342-347},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ajaf.20210906.12},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20210906.12},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajaf.20210906.12},
  abstract = {Nowadays, climate variability and changes are among the main environmental challenge within the world. The negative implication of global climate change on the agricultural sector is unequivocal, as its consequences affect the livelihoods of particularly smallholder farmers within the tropics. Windbreaks agroforestry practices has been offered as a climate smart agriculture technologies or practices to reduce the global climate variability and climate change. It is one of the most important adaptation and mitigation strategies of climate change. This review paper focuses on the importance of windbreaks agroforestry practices in global climate change adaptation and mitigation, the role of windbreak technology at the farm and landscape levels, effects of windbreaks on reduction wind speed and soil protection, role of windbreaks to reduce the vulnerability of climate change. Windbreaks can improve the efficiency of ecological and ecosystem services provided by natural resource. If planned properly, nitrogen-fixing trees also can provide direct benefits for increasing the productivity of agricultural crops in an organic way and by resulting higher yields. They enhance animal health, feed efficiency, reduce smells, and increase producers' economic returns when utilized in livestock production systems. Windbreaks can help boost crop productivity, diversify goods, and lift farm revenue by improving soil quality and reducing erosion, improving water quality and reducing flooding damage, improving animal habitat and biodiversity, and lowering pest control inputs. Within the final section, the precise challenges to adapting windbreaks agroforestry practices and adoption mechanisms were reviewed. Windbreaks agroforestry systems may prove to be very useful component of agricultural adaptation as both an economically feasible adaptation strategy for smallholder farmers vulnerable to climate change as well as a profitable greenhouse gas mitigation opportunity.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Review on Windbreaks Agroforestry as a Climate Smart Agriculture Practices
AU  - Ibsa Dawid Mume
AU  - Sisay Workalemahu
Y1  - 2021/11/17
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20210906.12
DO  - 10.11648/j.ajaf.20210906.12
T2  - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry
JF  - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry
JO  - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry
SP  - 342
EP  - 347
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2330-8591
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20210906.12
AB  - Nowadays, climate variability and changes are among the main environmental challenge within the world. The negative implication of global climate change on the agricultural sector is unequivocal, as its consequences affect the livelihoods of particularly smallholder farmers within the tropics. Windbreaks agroforestry practices has been offered as a climate smart agriculture technologies or practices to reduce the global climate variability and climate change. It is one of the most important adaptation and mitigation strategies of climate change. This review paper focuses on the importance of windbreaks agroforestry practices in global climate change adaptation and mitigation, the role of windbreak technology at the farm and landscape levels, effects of windbreaks on reduction wind speed and soil protection, role of windbreaks to reduce the vulnerability of climate change. Windbreaks can improve the efficiency of ecological and ecosystem services provided by natural resource. If planned properly, nitrogen-fixing trees also can provide direct benefits for increasing the productivity of agricultural crops in an organic way and by resulting higher yields. They enhance animal health, feed efficiency, reduce smells, and increase producers' economic returns when utilized in livestock production systems. Windbreaks can help boost crop productivity, diversify goods, and lift farm revenue by improving soil quality and reducing erosion, improving water quality and reducing flooding damage, improving animal habitat and biodiversity, and lowering pest control inputs. Within the final section, the precise challenges to adapting windbreaks agroforestry practices and adoption mechanisms were reviewed. Windbreaks agroforestry systems may prove to be very useful component of agricultural adaptation as both an economically feasible adaptation strategy for smallholder farmers vulnerable to climate change as well as a profitable greenhouse gas mitigation opportunity.
VL  - 9
IS  - 6
ER  -

Copy | Download