Sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam) is an essential resource for rural people due to its nutritional value, drought tolerance, and ability to adapt to various soil and climatic conditions. Despite the importance of sweet potato as a food crop, the low yield of this crop is caused by many factors such as low soil fertility of most arable fields, lack of improved varieties resistant to diseases, and good genetic traits. Therefore, as a result of low soil fertility in Nigeria, the soil must be supplemented with adequate macro-nutrients to improve and sustain the growth and yield of sweet potato varieties. This study examined the influence of NPK fertilizer application on the morphological characteristics and tuber yield of selected sweet potato varieties cultivated in Ogbomoso, Nigeria. Carried out at the Teaching and Research Farm, Ladoke Akintola University of Technology, Ogbomoso. It involved six sweet potato varieties (Ex-Igborian, Mother Delight, Butter, Tis 82/0087, King Jane, and Shaba) and two NPK rates (0 which is control, and NPK rate of 50 kgN, 11 kg P2O5 and 20 kg K2O ha-1) arranged in a 2X6 factorial experiment fitted into a randomized complete block design and replicated three times. Data were collected on growth parameters and yield attributes, and they were subjected to analysis of variance and means separated using the Least Significant Difference at a 5% probability level. Results showed that NPK fertilizer significantly (p=0.05) influenced the growth parameters such as vine length (84.60cm), number of leaves (54.70), and number of branches (11.70) obtained from plants under NPK application while control gave the least values. Fertilizer application had a significant effect (p=0.05) on the yield and yield attributes of sweet potatoes. Therefore, Mother Delight and Ex-Igborian with the application of 50 kgN, 11 kg P2O5 and 20 kg K2O ha-1can be recommended for optimum performance of sweet potato in the study area.
Published in | American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry (Volume 13, Issue 1) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ajaf.20251301.18 |
Page(s) | 69-79 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Sweet Potato, NPK Fertilizer, Growth Parameters, Yield, Variety
Number of branches | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Weeks after planting | ||||
Treatments | 4 | 6 | 8 | 10 |
Fertilizer Control | 1.60 | 3.60 | 5.30 | 7.10 |
NPK | 2.10 | 4.80 | 6.10 | 8.60 |
LSD (p≤0.05) | 0.31 | 0.78 | 1.01 | 1.41 |
Variety | ||||
EI | 2.40 | 4.30 | 7.50 | 10.80 |
MD | 1.80 | 6.40 | 7.90 | 11.70 |
BT | 1.70 | 3.80 | 2.80 | 4.00 |
TIS | 1.70 | 3.70 | 6.60 | 8.10 |
KJ | 2.00 | 4.00 | 6.30 | 7.00 |
SB | 1.60 | 2.80 | 3.30 | 5.50 |
LSD (p≤0.05) | 0.54 | 1.36 | 1.75 | 2.44 |
Number of branches | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Weeks after planting | |||||
Fertilizer Variety | 4 | 6 | 8 | 10 | |
Control | EI | 2.10 | 3.60 | 6.30 | 9.40 |
MD | 1.70 | 5.30 | 8.00 | 11.40 | |
BT | 1.40 | 2.90 | 2.60 | 3.70 | |
TIS | 1.70 | 3.40 | 5.70 | 7.00 | |
KJ | 1.50 | 3.40 | 6.20 | 6.30 | |
SB | 1.30 | 3.00 | 2.80 | 4.90 | |
NPK | EI | 2.70 | 5.00 | 8.60 | 12.20 |
MD | 1.90 | 7.40 | 7.80 | 12.10 | |
BT | 2.00 | 4.80 | 2.90 | 4.40 | |
TIS | 1.80 | 4.00 | 7.50 | 9.20 | |
KJ | 2.50 | 4.70 | 6.30 | 7.70 | |
SB | 2.00 | 2.70 | 3.70 | 6.10 | |
LSD (p≤0.05) | 0.76 | 1.92 | 2.48 | 3.45 |
Number of leaves | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Weeks after planting | ||||
Treatments | 4 | 6 | 8 | 10 |
Fertilizer Control | 27.60 | 29.20 | 30.10 | 35.60 |
NPK | 33.20 | 34.10 | 32.40 | 40.50 |
LSD (p≤0.05) | 3.43 | 4.24 | ns | ns |
Variety | ||||
EI | 34.70 | 42.30 | 43.50 | 50.00 |
MD | 35.20 | 39.10 | 43.10 | 54.70 |
BT | 26.20 | 24.30 | 22.70 | 27.20 |
TIS | 23.10 | 23.30 | 28.50 | 34.60 |
KJ | 34.00 | 30.90 | 27.00 | 31.20 |
SB | 29.10 | 29.70 | 22.80 | 30.50 |
LSD (p≤0.05) | 5.95 | 7.35 | 6.84 | 10.17 |
Number of leaves | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Weeks after planting | |||||
Fertilizer | Variety | 4 | 6 | 8 | 10 |
Control | EI | 31.70 | 38.10 | 40.30 | 47.20 |
MD | 34.10 | 39.50 | 43.30 | 51.40 | |
BT | 22.90 | 21.20 | 21.10 | 25.40 | |
TIS | 22.20 | 21.20 | 28.40 | 33.00 | |
KJ | 28.80 | 29.20 | 25.30 | 28.90 | |
SB | 25.70 | 25.60 | 22.40 | 27.70 | |
NPK | EI | 37.70 | 46.60 | 46.70 | 52.90 |
MD | 36.30 | 38.80 | 42.80 | 58.00 | |
BT | 29.40 | 27.40 | 24.30 | 29.00 | |
TIS | 23.90 | 25.40 | 28.60 | 36.10 | |
KJ | 39.30 | 32.60 | 28.80 | 33.50 | |
SB | 32.50 | 33.80 | 23.30 | 33.40 | |
LSD (p≤0.05) | 8.41 | 10.39 | 9.67 | 14.38 |
Vine length (cm) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Weeks after planting | ||||
Treatments | 4 | 6 | 8 | 10 |
Fertilizer Control | 17.60 | 33.20 | 45.50 | 50.60 |
NPK | 23.20 | 48.00 | 52.90 | 59.90 |
LSD (p≤0.05) | 4.46 | 8.18 | ns | ns |
Variety | ||||
EI | 18.30 | 42.20 | 55.90 | 67.50 |
MD | 33.60 | 64.60 | 78.30 | 84.60 |
BT | 15.70 | 28.00 | 33.00 | 37.60 |
TIS | 21.40 | 43.80 | 53.60 | 61.80 |
KJ | 18.60 | 39.70 | 42.60 | 42.10 |
SB | 14.50 | 25.00 | 31.80 | 37.80 |
LSD (p≤0.05) | 7.72 | 14.16 | 18.00 | 22.17 |
Vine length (cm) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Weeks after planting | |||||
Fertilizer | Variety | 4 | 6 | 8 | 10 |
Control | EI | 17.20 | 37.10 | 47.20 | 56.90 |
MD | 33.30 | 57.70 | 70.80 | 78.10 | |
BT | 12.90 | 22.80 | 34.20 | 36.10 | |
TIS | 18.00 | 35.90 | 53.30 | 63.30 | |
KJ | 12.50 | 25.30 | 40.00 | 34.20 | |
SB | 11.40 | 20.10 | 27.60 | 34.70 | |
NPK | EI | 19.40 | 47.30 | 64.50 | 78.00 |
MD | 34.00 | 71.50 | 85.80 | 91.10 | |
BT | 18.40 | 33.20 | 31.90 | 39.20 | |
TIS | 24.80 | 51.70 | 53.90 | 60.40 | |
KJ | 24.60 | 54.10 | 45.30 | 50.00 | |
SB | 17.70 | 29.90 | 36.10 | 40.90 | |
LSD (p≤0.05) | 10.91 | 20.03 | 25.46 | 31.35 |
Tuber diameter | Tuber length | Tuber weight | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Treatments | No of tuber | cm/tuber | kg/plant | |
Control | 12.60 | 21.70 | 15.90 | 1.40 |
NPK | 15.60 | 25.20 | 17.60 | 2.00 |
LSD (p≤0.05) | 2.08 | 3.89 | 2.22 | 0.58 |
Variety | ||||
EI | 13.00 | 27.70 | 19.10 | 2.40 |
MD | 14.70 | 25.50 | 17.80 | 2.00 |
BT | 15.20 | 20.30 | 15.50 | 1.50 |
TIS | 13.00 | 25.50 | 15.60 | 1.20 |
KJ | 15.50 | 21.40 | 16.30 | 1.60 |
SB | 13.20 | 20.20 | 16.00 | 1.60 |
LSD (p≤0.05) | ns | 6.74 | ns | 1.01 |
Interaction | Tuber diameter | Tuber length | Tuber weight | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fertilizer | Variety | No of tuber | cm/tuber | kg/plant | |
Control | EI | 11.70 | 26.50 | 17.50 | 2.20 |
MD | 14.00 | 22.70 | 16.40 | 1.70 | |
BT | 12.00 | 19.00 | 14.80 | 1.20 | |
TIS | 11.30 | 24.50 | 16.50 | 0.80 | |
KJ | 13.70 | 19.40 | 15.60 | 1.50 | |
SB | 12.70 | 17.90 | 14.50 | 1.10 | |
NPK | EI | 14.30 | 28.80 | 20.80 | 2.50 |
MD | 17.30 | 28.30 | 19.20 | 2.20 | |
BT | 16.30 | 21.60 | 16.20 | 1.80 | |
TIS | 14.70 | 26.60 | 14.80 | 1.70 | |
KJ | 17.30 | 23.40 | 17.00 | 1.70 | |
SB | 13.70 | 22.50 | 17.50 | 2.00 | |
LSD (p≤0.05) | ns | ns | 5.45 | 1.43 |
ANOVA | Analysis of Variance |
BT | Butter |
CM | Centimetre |
EI | Ex-Igborian |
KG | Kilogramme |
KJ | King Jane |
LSD | Least Significant Difference |
MD | Mother Delight |
MM | Millimetre |
MOP | Muriate of Potash |
NPK | Nitrogen Phosphorus and Potassium |
SB | Shaba |
SSP | Single Super Phosphate |
TIS | Tis82/0087 |
WAP | Weeks After Planting |
[1] | Adhikari, S., Shakya, S. M., and Shrestha, J. (2019). Fertilizer interaction effects on growth indices of tuber crops. Journal of Crop Science, 45(2), 123-129. |
[2] | Afoakwa, E. O., Ndife, O. S., Chukwuogo, U. C., and Anyanwu, L. I. (2022). Quality characteristics of bread enriched with sweet potato flour and orange sweet potato flour. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 123, 113-122. |
[3] | Akintayo, E. T., Adebayo, E. A., and Adeloye, A. R. (2022). Enhancing the nutritional value of cassava: Biofortification and biofortified cassava products. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 1-14. |
[4] | Chen, C., Li, X., Zhang, F., He, P., Yuan, X., Gao, Y., ... and Pei, J. (2020). Effects of long-term fertilization regimes on soil nitrogen fractions and nitrous oxide emissions in a winter wheat-summer maize cropping system. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 292, 106850. |
[5] | Ekanem, E. O. (2019). Factors influencing efficiency of sweet potato farms in Nigeria: Potentials for food security and poverty alleviation. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology B, 9(2), 285-292. |
[6] | Gibson, R. W. (2019). Sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas L. Lam). In Reference Module in Food Science (pp. 472-481). |
[7] | Li, S., Wang, Z., Jin, J., Luo, W., and Li, Y. (2018). Water-use efficiency and yield of winter wheat under different fertilization practices in a semi-arid environment. Agricultural Water Management, 197, 152-162. |
[8] | Liu, J., Li, X., Luo, G., Li, Y., Christie, P., and Wang, Z. (2019). Integrated use of fertilizer nitrogen and organic manure for high-yielding and sustainable sweet potato production: A review. Field Crops Research, 232, 144-154. |
[9] | Liu, X., Li, J., Wei, J., Jones, A. R., Luo, Y., and Christie, P. (2019). Interactive effects of biochar and fertilizer amendment on soil fertility and productivity of maize (Zea mays L.) grown in a sandy loam soil. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 272, 101-110. |
[10] | Liu, X., Wang, Y., Li, Y., Luo, G., and Liu, Y. (2020). Physiological and metabolic responses of sweet potato cultivars with contrasting drought tolerance to water stress. Journal of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 156, 157-167. |
[11] | Mwanga, A. H., Ssemakula, G. N., Ndunguru, G., Njoku, J., and Low, J. (2017). Sweetpotato breeding for multiple traits in Sub-Saharan Africa. In Sweetpotato: Biology, environment and biotechnology (pp. 201-223). |
[12] | Mwanga, H. M., Ssemakula, R. N., Adipala, E., and Gibson, R. W. (2018). Sweetpotato for food, feed and industrial uses in East Africa. Acta Horticulturae, 1201, 39-49. |
[13] | Mwanga, R. O., Yencho, G. C., and Moyer, J. W. (2021). Sweet potato genetic diversity and fertilization strategies. Plant Breeding Reviews, 45(3), 229-278. |
[14] | Mwangi, A. M., Aduda, E. O., and Ojiewo, M. O. (2017). Orange-fleshed sweet potato acceptability and household-level factors influencing its adoption in rural Kenya. African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development, 17(2), 3309-3324. |
[15] | Nwoke, C. V., Anyanwu, L. I., and Ibeawuchi, I. M. (2021). Sweet potato: A potential nutraceutical food crop. Journal of Food Technology, 19(2), 121-129. |
[16] | Olaniyi, J. O. (2006). Influence of Nitrogen and Phosphorus fertilizers on seed yield and quality of Egusi melon (Citrullus lanatus (Thunb) Mansf) in Ogbomoso, South Western Nigeria. Ph.D Thesis, University of Ibadan, pp. 57-155. |
[17] | Soltani, A., Yarnia, M., and Khaliqi, A. (2020). Potato response to phosphorus and zinc fertilization under water deficit stress. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 43(1), 127-138. |
[18] | Tian, J., Li, B., Xiang, Y., Liu, H., and Li, Y. (2023). Sweet potato dietary fiber: A comprehensive review of its functionality and health benefits. Food Reviews International, 36(5-6), 925-942. |
[19] | Wang, Y., Xu, X., Jin, Z., Zhu, F., and Li, Y. (2020). Sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas L.): A versatile food and industrial crop. Carbohydrate Polymers, 248, 116794. |
[20] | Wikifarmer. (2024). Sweet potato fertilization requirements. Retrieved from |
APA Style
Oni, D. O., Olaniyi, J. O. (2025). Variations in Morphological and Tuber Attributes of Sweet Potato (Ipomoea batatas) Varieties in Response to NPK in Ogbomoso, Nigeria. American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 13(1), 69-79. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20251301.18
ACS Style
Oni, D. O.; Olaniyi, J. O. Variations in Morphological and Tuber Attributes of Sweet Potato (Ipomoea batatas) Varieties in Response to NPK in Ogbomoso, Nigeria. Am. J. Agric. For. 2025, 13(1), 69-79. doi: 10.11648/j.ajaf.20251301.18
AMA Style
Oni DO, Olaniyi JO. Variations in Morphological and Tuber Attributes of Sweet Potato (Ipomoea batatas) Varieties in Response to NPK in Ogbomoso, Nigeria. Am J Agric For. 2025;13(1):69-79. doi: 10.11648/j.ajaf.20251301.18
@article{10.11648/j.ajaf.20251301.18, author = {Deborah Oluwasemilore Oni and Joel Oyekunle Olaniyi}, title = {Variations in Morphological and Tuber Attributes of Sweet Potato (Ipomoea batatas) Varieties in Response to NPK in Ogbomoso, Nigeria }, journal = {American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry}, volume = {13}, number = {1}, pages = {69-79}, doi = {10.11648/j.ajaf.20251301.18}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20251301.18}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajaf.20251301.18}, abstract = {Sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam) is an essential resource for rural people due to its nutritional value, drought tolerance, and ability to adapt to various soil and climatic conditions. Despite the importance of sweet potato as a food crop, the low yield of this crop is caused by many factors such as low soil fertility of most arable fields, lack of improved varieties resistant to diseases, and good genetic traits. Therefore, as a result of low soil fertility in Nigeria, the soil must be supplemented with adequate macro-nutrients to improve and sustain the growth and yield of sweet potato varieties. This study examined the influence of NPK fertilizer application on the morphological characteristics and tuber yield of selected sweet potato varieties cultivated in Ogbomoso, Nigeria. Carried out at the Teaching and Research Farm, Ladoke Akintola University of Technology, Ogbomoso. It involved six sweet potato varieties (Ex-Igborian, Mother Delight, Butter, Tis 82/0087, King Jane, and Shaba) and two NPK rates (0 which is control, and NPK rate of 50 kgN, 11 kg P2O5 and 20 kg K2O ha-1) arranged in a 2X6 factorial experiment fitted into a randomized complete block design and replicated three times. Data were collected on growth parameters and yield attributes, and they were subjected to analysis of variance and means separated using the Least Significant Difference at a 5% probability level. Results showed that NPK fertilizer significantly (p=0.05) influenced the growth parameters such as vine length (84.60cm), number of leaves (54.70), and number of branches (11.70) obtained from plants under NPK application while control gave the least values. Fertilizer application had a significant effect (p=0.05) on the yield and yield attributes of sweet potatoes. Therefore, Mother Delight and Ex-Igborian with the application of 50 kgN, 11 kg P2O5 and 20 kg K2O ha-1can be recommended for optimum performance of sweet potato in the study area. }, year = {2025} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Variations in Morphological and Tuber Attributes of Sweet Potato (Ipomoea batatas) Varieties in Response to NPK in Ogbomoso, Nigeria AU - Deborah Oluwasemilore Oni AU - Joel Oyekunle Olaniyi Y1 - 2025/02/27 PY - 2025 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20251301.18 DO - 10.11648/j.ajaf.20251301.18 T2 - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry JF - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry JO - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry SP - 69 EP - 79 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-8591 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20251301.18 AB - Sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam) is an essential resource for rural people due to its nutritional value, drought tolerance, and ability to adapt to various soil and climatic conditions. Despite the importance of sweet potato as a food crop, the low yield of this crop is caused by many factors such as low soil fertility of most arable fields, lack of improved varieties resistant to diseases, and good genetic traits. Therefore, as a result of low soil fertility in Nigeria, the soil must be supplemented with adequate macro-nutrients to improve and sustain the growth and yield of sweet potato varieties. This study examined the influence of NPK fertilizer application on the morphological characteristics and tuber yield of selected sweet potato varieties cultivated in Ogbomoso, Nigeria. Carried out at the Teaching and Research Farm, Ladoke Akintola University of Technology, Ogbomoso. It involved six sweet potato varieties (Ex-Igborian, Mother Delight, Butter, Tis 82/0087, King Jane, and Shaba) and two NPK rates (0 which is control, and NPK rate of 50 kgN, 11 kg P2O5 and 20 kg K2O ha-1) arranged in a 2X6 factorial experiment fitted into a randomized complete block design and replicated three times. Data were collected on growth parameters and yield attributes, and they were subjected to analysis of variance and means separated using the Least Significant Difference at a 5% probability level. Results showed that NPK fertilizer significantly (p=0.05) influenced the growth parameters such as vine length (84.60cm), number of leaves (54.70), and number of branches (11.70) obtained from plants under NPK application while control gave the least values. Fertilizer application had a significant effect (p=0.05) on the yield and yield attributes of sweet potatoes. Therefore, Mother Delight and Ex-Igborian with the application of 50 kgN, 11 kg P2O5 and 20 kg K2O ha-1can be recommended for optimum performance of sweet potato in the study area. VL - 13 IS - 1 ER -