High incidence of poverty in semi-arid region of central Tanzania is one of the major development challenges in the area. This has mainly been caused by failures of major crops due recurrent drought. Production of high value horticultural crops under irrigation such as grapes could be one of the strategies to reduce the severity of poverty levels and food shortages in the area. A cross-sectional study was carried out in Dodoma urban district to (i) assess the role of grapevine farming on household income and welfare of small scale farmers, (ii) examine the factors that affect grapevine farming, and (iii) identify strategies for improving grapevine farming. Household food security status and consumption expenditure were assessed and used as proxy indicators of the household welfare. The study involved a total of 252 respondents (126 grape farmers and 126 non-grape farmers). Data were collected through interviews using semi-structured questionnaire and analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) program version 20. Results show that grape farming contributes to more than one third (35.6%) of total household income and plays an important role in household welfare. Average household consumption expenditure for grape farmers was twofold higher than that of non-grape farmers (173,833 vs. 84,485 TZS;t = 13.3, p< 0.001). Score on household food insecurity index for grape farmers was 8.51 being lower than 11.9 for non-grape farmers (t = -5.7, p< 0.05). Nevertheless, there are a number of challenges in grape farming. These include low price of grapes, high costs of inputs, limited access to market, prevalence of pests and diseases, inadequate storage facilities and limited access to quality seedlings. This study gives insights into grape farming as a mitigation strategy of food shortage and the overall household welfare under the changing environmental and socio-economic circumstances.
Published in | American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry (Volume 3, Issue 3) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ajaf.20150303.12 |
Page(s) | 73-79 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2015. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Food Security, High Value Crop, Semi-Arid Areas
[1] | Arndt, C., Farmer, W., Strzepek, K and Thurlow, J. 2012. Climate change, agriculture and food security in Tanzania. Review of Development Economics, 16(3), 378-393 |
[2] | Asfaw, S., Shiferaw, B., Simtowe, F and Lipper, L. 2012. Impact of modern agriculture technologies on small holder farmer’s welfare. Evidence from Tanzania and Ethiopia. Food policy, 37, 283-295. |
[3] | Brussaard, L., Caron, P., Campbell, B., Lipper, L., Mainka, S., Rabbinge, R and Pulleman, M. 2010. Reconciling biodiversity conservation and food security: scientific challenges for a new agriculture. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2(1), 34-42. |
[4] | Coates, J., Swindale, A and Bilinsky, P. 2007. Household food insecurity access scale (HFIAS) for measurement of food access. Indicator Guide. Food and Nutrition technical assistance, USAID. |
[5] | Cooper, P., Dimes, J., Rao, K., Shapiro, B., Shiferaw, B and Twomlow, S. 2008. Coping better with current climatic variability in the rain-fed farming systems of sub-Saharan Africa: An essential first step in adapting to future climate change? Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 126(1), 24-35. |
[6] | Devereux, S and Edwards, J. 2004. Climate change and food security. IDS Bulletin, 35(3), 22-30. |
[7] | Di Falco, S and Chavas, J.P. 2009. On crop biodiversity, risk exposure, and food security in the highlands of Ethiopia. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 91(3), 599-611. |
[8] | Dodoma Urban District Report, 2014. Annual Report. |
[9] | Fischer, E and Qaim, M. 2012. Linking smallholders to markets: determinants and impacts of farmer collective action in Kenya. World Development, 40(6), 1255-1268. |
[10] | Fisher, A.A., Laing, J.E., Townsend and J.W. 1991. Handbook for family planning operations research and design. Operations research. Population council, USA |
[11] | Franzel, S. 1999. Socio-economic factors affecting the adoption potential of improved tree fallows in Africa. Agro forestry Systems 47,305- 321. |
[12] | Gadoury, D. M., Seem, R. C., Pearson, R. C., Wilcox, W. F and Dunst, R. M. 2001. Effects of powdery mildew on vine growth, yield, and quality of concord grapes. Plant Disease, 85(2), 137-140. |
[13] | Hellin, J., Lundy, M and Meijer, M. 2009. Farmer organization, collective action and market access in Meso-America. Food Policy, 34(1), 16-22. |
[14] | Hossain, M and Jaim, W. M. H. 2011. Empowering Women to Become Farmer Entrepreneur. In Paper presented at the IFAD Conference on New Directions for Smallholder Agriculture, Vol. 24, p. 25. |
[15] | IFAD.2008. International Fund for Agricultural Development. The role of high value crops in rural poverty reduction in the near east and North Africa. |
[16] | Junge, B., Deji, O., Abaidoo, R., Chikoye, D and Stahr, K. 2009. Farmers' Adoption of Soil Conservation Technologies: A Case Study from Osun State, Nigeria. The Journal of Agricultural education and extension.15 (3), 257- 274. |
[17] | Kahimba, F.C., Mutabazi, K.D., Tumbo, S.D., Masuki, K.F and Mbungu, W.B. 2014. Scaling –up of conservation agriculture in Tanzania: A case of Arusha and Dodoma Regions. Natural Resources, 2014 |
[18] | Kisusu, R. W.,Mdoe, N. S. Y.,Turuka, F. M and Mlambiti, M. E. 2000. Contribution of smallholder dairy production to food security, household income and poverty alleviation: the case of Mvumi dairy development project, Dodoma. In: Proceedings of the 18th Scientific Conference of the Tanzania Veterinary Association held at AICC, Arusha, Tanzania, 5-7 December 2000. Vol. 20 pp 89- 99 |
[19] | Kulig, A., Kolfoort, H and Hoekstra, R. 2010. The case for the hybrid capital approach for the measurement of the welfare and sustainability. Ecological Indicators, 10(2), 118-128. |
[20] | Kuwornu, J.K.M and Eric S. O. 2012. Irrigation access and per capita consumption expenditure in farm households: Evidence from Ghana. Journal of Development and Agricultural Economics, 4 (3), 78-92. |
[21] | Langat, J.K., Mutai, B.K., Maina, M.C and Bett, H.K. 2011. Effect of Credit on Household Welfare: The Case of “Village Bank” Credit in Bomet County, Kenya. Asian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 3(3), 162-170. |
[22] | Lin, B. B. 2011. Resilience in agriculture through crop diversification: adaptive management for environmental change. BioScience, 61(3), 183-193. |
[23] | Lipton, M. 2005. ‘The family farm in a globalizing world: The role of crop science in alleviating poverty’. Policy Brief 74. Washington, DC: IFPRI. |
[24] | Liwenga, E. 2003. Food Insecurity and Coping Strategies in Semiarid Areas. The Case of Mvumi in Central Tanzania. PhD thesis, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden. |
[25] | Mgwasa, D. 2012. Tanzania Distillers Limited (TDL) contribution on Dodoma vineyards development in Tanzania. Regional Workshop held on June 16- 17, 2012, Dar-es-salaam, Tanzania. |
[26] | Mkenda, A.F., Luvanda, E.G., Rutasitara, L and Naho, A. 2004. Poverty in Tanzania. Comparisons across administrative regions. |
[27] | Msaki, M.M., Mwenda, M.I and Regnald, I.J. 2013. Cereal bank as a necessary rural livelihood institute in Arid land, Makoje Village, Dodoma village, Dodoma – Tanzania. Asian Economic and Financial Review, 3(2), 259-269. |
[28] | Mukhebi, A., Mbogoh, S and Matungulu, K. 2012. Climate change, agriculture and food security in Tanzania. Review of Development Economics, 16(3), 378-393 |
[29] | Odoemenen, I. U and Obinne, C.P.O. 2010. Assessing the factors influencing the utilization of improved cereal crop production technologies by small-scale farmers in Nigeria. Indian Journal of Science and Technology. 3(1), 180-183. |
[30] | Omidvar, N., Ghazi-Tabatabie, M., Sadeghi, R., Mohammadi, F and Abbasi-Shavazi, M.J. 2013. Food insecurity and its socio demographic correlates among Afghsn Immigrants in Iran. Journal of Health Population and Nutrition, 3, 356- 366. |
[31] | Rakodi, C. 2002. A livelihoods approach: conceptual issues and definitions. Urban livelihoods: A people-centred approach to reducing poverty, 3-22. |
[32] | Sahn, D. E and Stifel, D. 2003. Exploring alternative measures of welfare in the absence of expenditure data. Review of income and wealth, 49(4), 463-489. |
[33] | Saka, J.O., Okoruwa, V.O., Lawal, B. O and Ajijola, S. 2005. Adoption of Improved Rice Varieties among Small-Holder Farmers in South-Western Nigeria. World Journal of Agricultural Sciences 1 (1), 42-49. |
[34] | Schmied, D. 1993. Managing food shortages in Central Tanzania. GeoJournal, 30(2), 153-158. |
[35] | Shiferaw, B., Obare, G and Muricho, G. 2006. Rural institutions and producer organizations in imperfect markets: Experiences from producer marketing groups in semi-arid eastern Kenya. Journal of SAT Agricultural Research, 2(1), 1-41. |
[36] | Singh, S. 2013. Governance and upgrading in export grape global production networks in India: BWPI, The University of Manchester. |
[37] | Steduto, P., Hsiao, T. C., Raes, D and Fereres, E. 2012. Crop yield response to water: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. |
[38] | Stringer, L. C., Dyer, J. C., Reed, M. S., Dougill, A. J., Twyman, C and Mkwambisi, D. 2009. Adaptations to climate change, drought and desertification: local insights to enhance policy in southern Africa. Environmental Science and Policy, 12(7), 748-765 |
[39] | Swai, O. W., Mbwambo, J. S and Magayane, F. T. 2012. Gender and perception on climate change in Bahi and Kondoa Districts, Dodoma Region, Tanzania. Journal of African Studies and Development, 4(9), 218-231. |
[40] | Toledo, Á and Burlingame, B. 2006. Biodiversity and nutrition: A common path toward global food security and sustainable development. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 19(6), 477-483. |
[41] | United Republic of Tanzania. 2007. National Adaptation Programme of Action (NAPA), Vice President’s Office, Division of Environment, p. 52. |
[42] | United Republic of Tanzania. 2013. Population and Housing Census. National Bureau of Statistics (Tanzania). |
[43] | Weinberger, K and Lumpkin, T.A. 2007. ‘Diversification into horticulture and poverty reduction: A research agenda’. World Development 35(8), 1464-1480 |
APA Style
James Lwelamira, John Safari, Patrick Wambura. (2015). Grapevine Farming and its Contribution to Household income and Welfare among Smallholder Farmers in Dodoma Urban District, Tanzania. American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 3(3), 73-79. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20150303.12
ACS Style
James Lwelamira; John Safari; Patrick Wambura. Grapevine Farming and its Contribution to Household income and Welfare among Smallholder Farmers in Dodoma Urban District, Tanzania. Am. J. Agric. For. 2015, 3(3), 73-79. doi: 10.11648/j.ajaf.20150303.12
AMA Style
James Lwelamira, John Safari, Patrick Wambura. Grapevine Farming and its Contribution to Household income and Welfare among Smallholder Farmers in Dodoma Urban District, Tanzania. Am J Agric For. 2015;3(3):73-79. doi: 10.11648/j.ajaf.20150303.12
@article{10.11648/j.ajaf.20150303.12, author = {James Lwelamira and John Safari and Patrick Wambura}, title = {Grapevine Farming and its Contribution to Household income and Welfare among Smallholder Farmers in Dodoma Urban District, Tanzania}, journal = {American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry}, volume = {3}, number = {3}, pages = {73-79}, doi = {10.11648/j.ajaf.20150303.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20150303.12}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajaf.20150303.12}, abstract = {High incidence of poverty in semi-arid region of central Tanzania is one of the major development challenges in the area. This has mainly been caused by failures of major crops due recurrent drought. Production of high value horticultural crops under irrigation such as grapes could be one of the strategies to reduce the severity of poverty levels and food shortages in the area. A cross-sectional study was carried out in Dodoma urban district to (i) assess the role of grapevine farming on household income and welfare of small scale farmers, (ii) examine the factors that affect grapevine farming, and (iii) identify strategies for improving grapevine farming. Household food security status and consumption expenditure were assessed and used as proxy indicators of the household welfare. The study involved a total of 252 respondents (126 grape farmers and 126 non-grape farmers). Data were collected through interviews using semi-structured questionnaire and analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) program version 20. Results show that grape farming contributes to more than one third (35.6%) of total household income and plays an important role in household welfare. Average household consumption expenditure for grape farmers was twofold higher than that of non-grape farmers (173,833 vs. 84,485 TZS;t = 13.3, p< 0.001). Score on household food insecurity index for grape farmers was 8.51 being lower than 11.9 for non-grape farmers (t = -5.7, p< 0.05). Nevertheless, there are a number of challenges in grape farming. These include low price of grapes, high costs of inputs, limited access to market, prevalence of pests and diseases, inadequate storage facilities and limited access to quality seedlings. This study gives insights into grape farming as a mitigation strategy of food shortage and the overall household welfare under the changing environmental and socio-economic circumstances.}, year = {2015} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Grapevine Farming and its Contribution to Household income and Welfare among Smallholder Farmers in Dodoma Urban District, Tanzania AU - James Lwelamira AU - John Safari AU - Patrick Wambura Y1 - 2015/04/27 PY - 2015 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20150303.12 DO - 10.11648/j.ajaf.20150303.12 T2 - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry JF - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry JO - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry SP - 73 EP - 79 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-8591 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20150303.12 AB - High incidence of poverty in semi-arid region of central Tanzania is one of the major development challenges in the area. This has mainly been caused by failures of major crops due recurrent drought. Production of high value horticultural crops under irrigation such as grapes could be one of the strategies to reduce the severity of poverty levels and food shortages in the area. A cross-sectional study was carried out in Dodoma urban district to (i) assess the role of grapevine farming on household income and welfare of small scale farmers, (ii) examine the factors that affect grapevine farming, and (iii) identify strategies for improving grapevine farming. Household food security status and consumption expenditure were assessed and used as proxy indicators of the household welfare. The study involved a total of 252 respondents (126 grape farmers and 126 non-grape farmers). Data were collected through interviews using semi-structured questionnaire and analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) program version 20. Results show that grape farming contributes to more than one third (35.6%) of total household income and plays an important role in household welfare. Average household consumption expenditure for grape farmers was twofold higher than that of non-grape farmers (173,833 vs. 84,485 TZS;t = 13.3, p< 0.001). Score on household food insecurity index for grape farmers was 8.51 being lower than 11.9 for non-grape farmers (t = -5.7, p< 0.05). Nevertheless, there are a number of challenges in grape farming. These include low price of grapes, high costs of inputs, limited access to market, prevalence of pests and diseases, inadequate storage facilities and limited access to quality seedlings. This study gives insights into grape farming as a mitigation strategy of food shortage and the overall household welfare under the changing environmental and socio-economic circumstances. VL - 3 IS - 3 ER -