| Peer-Reviewed

Pedological Characterization and Suitability Assessment for Cassava Production in Bukoba, Missenyi and Biharamulo Districts, Tanzania

Received: 30 June 2020     Accepted: 13 July 2020     Published: 28 July 2020
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

A study was conducted in Bukoba, Missenyi and Biharamulo Districts, Tanzania with the objectives of characterizing, classifying and assessing the suitability of the study area for cassava production. A reconnaissance field survey using transect walks and auger observations was done in the study sites, which were geo-referenced in terms of international coordinates using Global Positioning System. Soil profiles representative of the study sites were excavated and named as MARU-P1, MISSE-P1 and BIHA-P1 for Bukoba, Missenyi and Biharamulo Districts, respectively. Soil profile description and data on the morphological features of the representative soils were collected according to the FAO Guidelines for Soil Description. Disturbed and undisturbed soil samples were collected from genetic soil horizons, processed and analyzed in a soil laboratory. Data on site characteristics, climate, soil morphological features and soil physical and chemical properties were used to classify the soils to the family level of the USDA Soil Taxonomy and to tier-2 of the FAO World Reference Base for Soil Resources. Soil suitability assessment of the experimental sites was done using a simple limitation method based on the FAO Framework for Land Evaluation. The results reveal that Pedons MARU-P1 and BIHA-P1 have similar morphological properties, which are different from pedon MISSE-P1. However, the studied pedons differ in their physical and chemical properties, implying differences in their use and management. The climate of the study sites is semi-humid with Udic soil moisture regime, which is generally favourable for crop production. According to the USDA Soil Taxonomy, pedons MARU-P1 and BIHA-P1 were classified as “Typic Kandiudults”. In addition, according to FAO World Reference Base for Soil Resources, pedons MARU-P1 and BIHA-P1 were classified as “Haplic Ferralic Acrisols” and “Chromic Ferralic Acrisols”, respectively. Pedon MISSE-P1 was classified as “Typic Endoaquolls” according to USDA Soil Taxonomy and as “Fluvic Gleyic Phaeozems” according to FAO World Reference Base for Soil Resources. Pedons MISSE-P1 and BIHA-P1 were both evaluated as marginally suitable while MARU-P1 pedon was evaluated as moderately suitable for cassava production due to soil fertility constraints. We recommended specific soil fertility management strategies in each studied site for optimum cassava yields.

Published in American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry (Volume 8, Issue 4)
DOI 10.11648/j.ajaf.20200804.18
Page(s) 144-166
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Pedological Characterization, Soil Characterization, Suitability Assessment, Cassava Production, Physical and Chemical Properties, Soil Fertility Management

References
[1] Msanya, B. M., Kaaya, A. K., Araki, S., Otsuka, H. and Nyadzi, G. I. (2003). Pedological characteristics, general fertility and classification of some benchmark soils of Morogoro District, Tanzania. African Journal of Science and Technology Science and Engineering Series, 4 (2): 101-112.
[2] Karuma, A. N., Gachene, K., Charles, K., Msanya, B. M., Mtakwa, P. W., Amuri, N. and Gicheru, P. T. (2015). Soil morphology, physico-chemical properties and classification of typical soils of Mwala District, Kenya. International Journal of Plant and Soil Science, 4 (2): 156-170.
[3] Muya, E. M., Obanyi, S., Ngutu, M., Sijali, I. V., Okoti, M., Maingi, P. M. and Bulle, H. (2011). The physical and chemical characteristics of soils of Northern Kenya Arid lands: Opportunity for sustainable agricultural production. Journal of Soil Science and Environmental Management, 2 (1): 1-8.
[4] Robert, P. (1993). Characterization of soil conditions at the field level for soil specific management. Geoderma, 60 (1-4): 57-72.
[5] Msanya, B. M., Kimaro, D. N., Kimbi, G G., Kileo, E. P. and Mbogoni, J. D. J. (2001). Land resources inventory and suitability assessment for the major land use types in Morogoro Urban District, Tanzania: Soils and Land Resources of Morogoro Rural and Urban Districts, Volume 4. Department of Soil Science, SUA, Morogoro, Tanzania. pp. 1-66.
[6] Kalala, A. M., Msanya, B. M., Amuri, N. A. and Semoka, J. M. (2017). Pedological characterization of some typical alluvial soils of Kilombero District, Tanzania. American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 5 (1): 1-11.
[7] Msanya, B. M., Mwasyika, T. A., Amuri, N., Semu, E. and Mhoro, L. (2018). Pedological characterization of typical soils of Dodoma Capital City District, Tanzania: soil morphology, physico-chemical properties, classification and soil fertility trends. Annals of Advanced Agricultural Sciences, 2 (4): 59-73.
[8] Msanya, B. M., Munishi, J., Amuri, N., Semu, E., Mhoro, L. and Malley, Z. (2016). Morphology, genesis, physico-chemical properties, classification and potential of soils derived from volcanic parent materials in selected Districts of Mbeya Region, Tanzania. International Journal of Plant and Soil Science, 10 (4): 1-19.
[9] Tenga, J. J., Msanya, B. M., Semoka, J. M., Semu, E. and Mwango, S. B. (2018). Pedological characterization and classification of some typical soils in three agro-ecological settings of South-Eastern Tanzania. International Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research, 9 (2): 692-702.
[10] Onyekanne, C. F. and Nnaji, G. U. (2012). Characterization and classification of soils of Ideato North local government area. Nigerian Journal of Soil Science, 22 (1): 11-17.
[11] Lufega, S. M. and Msanya, B. M. (2017). Pedological characterization and soil classification of selected soil units of Morogoro District, Tanzania. International Journal of Plant and Soil Science, 16 (1): 1-12.
[12] Chekol, W. and Mnalku, A. (2012). Selected physical and chemical characteristics of soils of the middle awash irrigated farm lands, Ethiopia. Ethiopian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 22 (1): 127-142.
[13] Adhanom, D. and Toshome, T. (2016). Characterization and classification of soils of Aba-Midan sub watershed in Bambasi Wereda, West Ethiopia. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 6 (6): 390-399.
[14] Rajeshwar, M. and Mani, S. (2015). Genesis, classification and evaluation of cotton growing soils in semi arid tropics of Tamil Nadu. Asian Journal of Soil Science, 10 (1): 130-141.
[15] Ukut, A. N., Akpan, U. S. and Udoh, B. T. (2014). Characterization and classification of soils in steep sided hills and sharp-crested ridges of Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria. Net Journal of Agricultural Science, 2 (2): 50-57.
[16] Kebeney, S. J., Msanya, B. M., Ng’etich, W. K., Semoka, J. M. and Serrem, C. K. (2014). Pedological characterization of some typical soils of Busia County, Western Kenya: Soil morphology, physico-chemical properties, classification and fertility trends. International Journal of Plant and Soil Science, 4 (1): 29-44.
[17] Sehgal, J. L. (1991). Soil-site suitability evaluation for cotton. Agropedology, 1: 49-63.
[18] Ande, O. T. (2011). Soil suitability evaluation and management for cassava production in the derived Savanna Area of Southwestern Nigeria. International Journal of Soil Science, 6 (2): 142-149.
[19] Bandyopadhyay, S., Jaiswal, R. K., Hegde, V. S. and Jayaraman, V. (2009). Assessment of land suitability potentials for agriculture using a remote sensing and GIS based approach. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 30 (4): 879-895.
[20] Narayanaswamy, Y. A., Inayathulla, M., Thabrez, M. and Shashishankar, A. (2017). Land suitability evaluation of soils for crop production. Internatinal Journal Innovative Research Science Enginering Technology, 6 (9): 18187-18196.
[21] Denis, M. K. A., Patil, P. L., Gali, S. K. and Quee, D. D. (2016). Soil suitability assessment for sustainable production of vegetable crops in Northern semi-arid region of India. International Journal of Agricultural Policy and Research, 4 (3): 52-61.
[22] Mbaga, H. R., Msanya, B. M. and Mrema, J. P. (2017). Pedological characterization of typical soil of Dakawa Irrigation Scheme, Mvomero District, Morogoro Region, Tanzania. International Journal of Current Research in Biosciences and Plant Biology, 4 (6): 77-86.
[23] Msanya, B. M. and Magoggo, J. P. (1993). Review of Soil Surveys (Soil Resource Inventories) inTanzania. Ecology and Development Programme, 804-2144.
[24] Kilasara, M., Magoggo, J. P. and Msanya, B. M. (1994). Land resource management in Tanzania In: Proceedings of the Faculty of Agriculture Research Workshop held at the Institute of Continuing Education, Sokoine University of Agriculture, (Edited by A. J. P. Tarimo, D. F. Rutatora and A. Z. Mattee), 21-23 March, 1994. Morogoro, Tanzania.
[25] Shelukindo, H. B., Msanya, B. M., Semu, E., Mwango, S. B., Munishi, P. K. T. and Singh, B. R. (2013). Characterization of some soils of the Miombo Woodlands Ecosystem of Kitonga Forest Reserve, Iringa, Tanzania: Physico-chemical properties and classification. In: Joint proceedings of the 27th Soil Science Society of East Africa and the 6th African Soil Science Society, October 2013. Nakuru, Kenya.
[26] Kimaro, D. N., Msanya, B. M., Meliyo, J., Hieronimo, P., Mwango, S., Kihupi, N. I., Gulinck, H. and Deckers, J. A. (2014). Anthropogenic soils and land use patterns in relation to small mammal and flea abundance in plague endemic area of Western Usambara Mountains, Tanzania. Tanzania Journal of Health Research, 16 (3): 1-12.
[27] Mfaume, D. P., Msanya, B. M. and Msaky, J. J. (2019). Pedological Characterization and Fertility Assessment of Mbimba Substation Soils Under Coffee Production in Mbozi District, Tanzania. International Journal of Advances in Scientific Research and Engineering, 5 (10): 22 1-236.
[28] United Republic of Tanzania (URT) (2019). Kagera Region Investment Guide-2019. Kagera Regional Commissioner Office, Kagera, Tanzania. 92 pp.
[29] Oosterom, A. P., Ngailo, J. A., Kileo, R. O., Mbogoni, J. D. J., Msangi, A. S., Andriesse, W. and van Kekem, A. J. (1999). Land Resources of Biharamulo District, Kagera region, Tanzania, International Activities Report 75. Winand Staring Centre, Wageningen (The Netherlands). 160 pp.
[30] Baijukya, F. P. and Folmer, E. C. R. (1999). Agro-Ecological Zonation of the Kagera region. In: Planning the Future: Past, Present and Future Perspectives of Land Use in Kagera Region. (Edited by Folmer, E. C. R. Schouten, C. and Baijukya, F. P.), Bukoba, Kagera, Tanzania. pp. 28-39.
[31] United Republic of Tanzania (URT) (2012). National Sample Census of Agriculture 2007/2008 Regional Report-Kagera Region, Volume V. National Bureau of Statistics, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. 315pp.
[32] Food Agricultural Organization (FAO) (2006). Guidelines for Soil Description. 4th edition. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy. 66 pp.
[33] Munsell Colour Company (MCC) (2000). Munsell Soil Colour Charts. 2000 Reviewed Washable Edition. Gretag Macbeth, Windsor, New York. 10 pp.
[34] Bradford, J. M. (1986). Penetrability. In:. Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 1 Physical and Mineralogical Methods. (Edited by Klute A). American Society of Agronomy, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin, pp. 463-478.
[35] Taylor, H. M., Roberson, G. M. and Parker Jr, J. J. (1966). Soil strength-root penetration relations for medium-to coarse-textured soil materials. Soil science 102 (1): 18-22.
[36] Pabin, J., Lipiec, J., Włodek, S., Biskupski, A. and Kaus, A., (1998). Critical soil bulk density and strength for pea seedling root growth as related to other soil factors. Soil and Tillage Research, 46 (3-4): 203-208.
[37] Hazelton, P. and Murphy, B. (2016). Interpreting Soil Test Research: What do all the number mean? 3rd Edition. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) Publishing. Clayton South, Australia. 186 pp.
[38] Soil Science Division Staff (2017). Soil Survey Manual. United State Department of Agriculture, United State of America. 603 pp.
[39] Day, P. R (1965). Particle fractionation and particle size analysis. In: Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 1. (Edited by Black, C. A., Evans, D. D., White, J. L., Ensminger, L. E. and Clark, F. E.), American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin. pp. 545-566.
[40] Moberg, J. P. (2001). Soil Analysis Manual (revised edition). The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Chemistry Department, Copenhagen, Denmark. 137 pp.
[41] Soil Survey Staff (2014). Keys to Soil Taxonomy. 12th Edition. Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Handbook, Washington DC. 372 pp.
[42] National Soil Service (NSS) (1990). Laboratory procedures for routine analysis, 3rd edition. Agricultural Research Institute, Mlingano Tanga, Tanzania. 212 pp.
[43] Saka, A. R. and Haque, I. (1993). Methods of analysis for selected soil physical properties. Soil Science Fact Sheet No. 2. Department of Agricultural Research, Chitedze Agricultural Research Station, Lilongwe, Malawi. 74 pp.
[44] Klute, A. (1986). Water retention. In: Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 1, and Agronomy Monograph No. 9. (Edited by Klute, A.). American Society of Agronomy and Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin. pp. 635-662.
[45] Okalebo, J. R., Gathua, K. W and Woomer, P. L. (2002). Laboratory methods of soil and plant analysis: A working manual. 2nd edition. 128. TSBF-CIAT and SACRED Africa, Nairobi. 127 pp.
[46] Nelson, D. W. and Sommers L. E. (1986). Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. In: Methods of Soil Analysis II: Chemical and Microbiological properties. Second Edition. (Edited by. Page, A. L. Miller, R. H. Keeney, D. R. Baker, D. E. Roscoe E. Ellis, J. and Rhodes, J. D). Madison, Wisconsin, USA. pp. 539-581
[47] Duursma, E. K. and Dawson, R. (eds) (1981). Marine organic chemistry: Evolution, composition, interactions and chemistry of organic matter in seawater. Elsevier. 521 pp.
[48] Bremner, J. M. and Mulvaney, C. S. (1982). Total nitrogen. In: Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2. (Edited by Black et al., 1981) Agronomy Monograph 9, American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin, USA. pp. 1149-1170.
[49] Bray, R. H. and Kurtz, L. T. (1945). Determination of total, organic and available forms of phosphorus in soils. Soil Science, 59: 39-45.
[50] Thomas, G. W., (1986). Exchangeable cations. In: Methods of Soil Analysis II: Chemical and Microbiological Properties. Second Edition. (Edited by, Page, A. L. Miller, R. H. Keeney, D. R. Baker, D. E. Roscoe E. Ellis, J. and Rhodes, J. D.). Madison, Wisconsin, USA. pp. 403-430.
[51] Chapman, H. D. (1965). Cation exchange capacity. In: Methods of Soil Analysis. (Edited by Black C. A). American Institute of Agronomy, 9: 891-901.
[52] Lindsay W. L. and Norvell W. A. (1978). Development of a DTPA soil test for zinc, iron, manganese and copper. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 42: 421-428.
[53] Landon, J. R. (1991). Booker Tropical Soil Manual. A handbook for soil survey and agricultural land evaluation in the tropics and subtropics, Longman Scientific and Technical Publishers, Essex. 474 pp.
[54] Takahashi, G. (2015). Sample preparation for X-ray fluorescence analysis. Rigaku Journal, 31: 26-30.
[55] Mobius, J., Lahajnar, N. and Emeis, K. C. (2010). Diagenetic control of nitrogen isotope ratios in Holocene sapropels and recent sediments from the Eastern Mediterranean Sea. Biogeosciences, 7: 3901-3914.
[56] IUSS Working Group WRB. (2015). World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2014, update 2015. International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps. World Soil Resources Reports No. 106. FAO, Rome, Italy. 203 pp.
[57] Food Agricultural Organization (FAO) (1976). A framework for land evaluation. Soils Bulletin 3, Rome, Italy. 72 pp.
[58] Sys, C., Van Ranst, E. and Debavye, J. (1991). Land evaluation, Part 2. Methods of land evaluation. Agriculture Publication. No. 7, Belgium. 247 pp.
[59] Howeler, R. H. (2002). Cassava Mineral Nutrition and Fertilization. In: Cassava: Biology, Production and Utilization. Hillocks, R. J., Thresh, M. J. and Bellotti, A. C. (Eds.). CABI Publishing, Wallingford, Oxon, United Kingdom. pp. 115-147.
[60] Howeler, R. H. (ed) (2011). The Cassava Handbook. A Reference Manual on the Asian Regional Cassava Training Course, held in Thailand. Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT), Thailand. 801pp.
[61] Abua, M. A. (2015). Suitability assessment of soils for cassava production in the coastal and hinterland areas of southern Cross River state, Nigeria. Journal of Science and Environmental Management, 6 (5): 108-115.
[62] Baijukya, F. P. (2004). Adapting to change in banana-based farming systems of Northwest Tanzania: The potential role of herbaceous legume. Thesis for the ward a PhD Degree at the Wageningen University. Wageningen. The Netherland. 192 pp.
[63] Touber, L. and Kanani, J. R. (1994). Landforms and soils of Bukoba District. Bukoba District Rural Development Programme. NEDWORC, Networking in Development, The Netherland. 145 pp.
[64] Khan, Z. H., Hussain, M. S. and Ottner, F. (2012). Morphogenesis of Three Surface−Water Gley Soils from the Meghna Floodplain of Bangladesh. Dhaka University Journal of Biological Science, 21 (2): 17 ‐ 27.
[65] Obasi, S. N., Onweremadu, E. U., Egbuche, C. T. and Iwuanyanwu, U. P. (2015). Characterization and Classification of Selected Rice Soils of Tropical Rainforest Region, Southeastern Nigeria. Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, 4 (3): 46-50.
[66] Brady, N. C. and Weil, R. R. (2017). The nature and properties of soil. 15th Edition. Pearson Education. Essex, England. 1104 pp.
[67] Lal, R and Shukla, M. K. (eds) (2005). Principles of Soil Physics. Marcel Dekker, Incorporation. New York. 716 pp.
[68] Saglam, M. and Dengiz, O. (2014). Distribution and evaluation of soil fertility based on geostatistical approach in Bafra Deltaic Plain. Turkish Journal of Agricultural Research, 1 (2): 186-195.
[69] Pal, D. K., Srivastava, P. and Bhattacharyya, T. (2003). Clay illuviation in calcareous soils of the semiarid part of the Indo-Gangetic Plains, India. Geoderma, 115 (3-4): 177-192.
[70] Akpan-Idiok, A. U. and Ogbaji, P. O. (2013). Characterization and Classification of Onwu River Floodplain Soils in Cross River State, Nigeria. International Journal of Agricultural Research, 8: 107-122.
[71] Moraes, M. T. D., Silva, V. R. D., Zwirtes, A. L. and Carlesso, R. (2014). Use of penetrometers in agriculture: a review. Engenharia Agrícola, 34 (1): 179-193.
[72] Uwingabire, S. (2016). Pedological characterization of soils developed on gneissic-granites in Congo Nile watershed divide and central Plateau zones of Rwanda. Thesis for award of PhD Degree at the Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania. 102 pp.
[73] Costantini, E. A., Angelone, M. and Damiani, D. (2002). Physical, geochemical and mineralogical indicators of aging in Quaternary soils of Central Italy. In: 17th World Congress of Soil Science, Transactions. International Union of Soil Sciences, 599: 1-9.
[74] Bwana, T. N. (2019). Environmental performance of smallholder organic and conventional cotton production systems in Meatu, Tanzania. Thesis for award of PhD Degree at the Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania. 190pp.
[75] Munishi, J. A. (2012). Pedological characterization of soils and assessment of their agricultural potential in selected Districts of Mbeya Region, Tanzania. Thesis for award of MSc Degree at the Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania. 136 pp.
[76] Uwitonze, P., Msanya, B. M., Mtakwa, P. W., Uwingabire, S., Sirikare, S. (2016). Pedological characterization of soils developed from volcanic parent materials of Northern Province of Rwanda. Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing, 5 (6): 225-236.
[77] EuroConsult (1989). Agricultural Compendium for Rural Development in the Tropics and Subtropics, 3rd edition, Elsevier Science Publishers. Amsterdam. 740 pp.
[78] Baize, D. (1993). Soil Science Analyses. A Guide to Current Use. John Wiley & Sons Ltd. West Sussex. 192pp.
[79] Horneck, D. D., Sullivan, D. M., Owen, J. S. and Hart, J. M. (2011). Soil Test Interpretation Guide. Extension services, Oregon State University. 12 pp.
[80] Ndakidemi P. A. and Semoka J. M. R. (2006). Soil Fertility Survey in Western Usambara Mountains, Northern Tanzania. Pedosphere 16 (2): 237-244.
[81] Sanginga, N. and Woomer, P. L. (eds.) (2009). Integrated Soil Fertility Management in Africa: Principles, Practices and Development Process. Tropical Soil Biology and Fertility Institute of the International Centre for Tropical Agriculture. Nairobi, Kenya. 263 pp.
[82] Ge, S., Xu, H., Ji, M. and Jiang, Y. (2013). Characteristics of Soil Organic Carbon, Total Nitrogen, and C/N Ratio in Chinese Apple Orchards. Open Journal of Soil Science, 3: 213-217.
[83] Tabi, F. O., Ngobesing, E. S. C., Yinda, G. S., Boukong, A., Omoko, M., Bitondo, D. and Mvondo Ze, A. D. (2013). Soil fertility capability classification (FCC) for rice production in Cameroon lowlands. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 8 (119): 1650-1665.
[84] Barker, A. V. and Pilbeam D. J. (2007). Handbook of plant nutrition. Taylor and Francis, London, New York. 662pp.
[85] Wiyantoko, B., and Rahmah, N. (2017). Measurement of cation exchange capacity (CEC) on natural zeolite by percolation method. In AIP Conference Proceedings, Vol. 1911, 020021, No. 1, AIP Publishing LLC. Doi: 10.1063/1.5016014.
[86] Van Wambeke, A. (1962). Criteria for classifying tropical soils by age. Journal of soil Science, 13 (1): 124-132.
[87] Edem, S. O. and Ndaeyo, N. U. (2009). Fertility status and management implications of wetland soils for sustainable crop production in Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria. Environment development and sustainability, 11 (2): 393-406.
[88] Yilmaz, K., Çelik, I., Kapur, S. and Ryan, J. (2005). Clay minerals, Ca/Mg ratio and Fe-Al-oxides in relation to structural stability, hydraulic conductivity and soil erosion in southeastern Turkey. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 29 (1): 29-37.
[89] Sillanpää, M. (1982). Micronutrients and the nutrient status of soils: A global study, FAO soils bulletin no 48, FAO. Rome, Italy. pp. 17-97.
[90] Esu, I. E (1991). Detailed soil survey of National Horticultural Research Institute (NIHORT) Farm at Bunkure, Kano State, Nigeria. Institute for Agricultural Research, Ahmad Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria. 72 pp.
[91] Deb, D. L. and Sakal, R. (2002). Micronutrients. In Indian Society of Soil Science. Indian Research Institute, New Delhi. pp. 391-403.
[92] Motsara, M. R., and Roy, R. N. (2008). Guide to laboratory establishment for plant nutrient analysis, Vol. 19. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 219 pp.
[93] Mustapha, S., Mamman, H. K, Abdulhamid, N. A. (2010). Status and distribution of extractable micronutrients in Haplustults in Yamaltu-Deba Local Government Area, Gombe State, Nigeria. Journal of Soil Science and Environmental Management, 1 (8): 200-204.
[94] Bassirani, N. Abolhassani, M. and Galavi, M. (2011). Distribution of available micronutrients as related to the soil characteristics of Hissar; Haryana, India. Africa Journal of Agricultural Research, 6 (18): 4239-4242.
[95] Dos-Santos, G. C. G., Valladares, G. S., Abreu, C. A., de Camargo, O. A., and Grego, C. R. (2013). Assessment of copper and zinc in soils of a vineyard region in the state of São Paulo, Brazil. In Applied and Environmental Soil Science. Hindawi Publishing Corporation, Sao Paulo, Brazil. 10 pp.
[96] Mulima, I. M., Shafiu, M., Ismaila, M., and Benisheikh, K. M. (2015). Status and Distribution of Some Available Micronutrients in Sudan and Sahel Savanna Agro-Ecological Zones of Yobe State, Nigeria. Journal of Environmental Issues and Agriculture in Developing Countries, 7 (1): 18-29.
[97] Oyinlola, E. Y. and Chude, V. O. (2010). Status of available micronutrients of the basement complex rock derived Alfisols in Northern Nigeria Savanna. Tropical and subtropical Agro-ecosystems, 12 (2): 229-237.
[98] Towett, E. K., Shepherd, K. D., Tondoh, J. E., Winowiecki, L. A., Lulseged, T., Nyambura, M., Sila, A., Vågen, T. G. and Cadisch, G., (2015). Total elemental composition of soils in Sub-Saharan Africa and relationship with soil forming factors. Geoderma Regional, 5: 157-168.
[99] Rawlins, B. G., McGrath, S. P., Scheib, A. J., Breward, N. Cave, M., Lister, T. R., Ingham, M., Gowing, C. and Carter, S. (2012). The Advanced Soil Geochemical Atlas of England and Wales. British Geological Survey, 1472–148.
[100] Baba, M., Hennie, F. W., Soehady, E. and Sanudin, T. (2008). Geochemical characterization of volcanic soils from Tawau, abah. Geological Society of Malaysia Bulletin, 54: 33-36.
[101] Acosta, J. A., Martinez, S., Faz, A. and Arocena, J. (2011). Accumulations of major and trace elements in particle size fractions of soils on eight different parent materials. Geoderma, 161: 30-42.
[102] Ceryan, Ş., Ceryan N. and Aydın, A. (2005). Determination of weathering in engineering time using interaction matrices. In: Proceedings. of 1st International Symposium on Travertine, September 21-25, Pamukkale University, Denizli, Turkey. pp. 297-304.
[103] Ceryan, S. (2012). Weathering indices for assessment of weathering effect and classification of weathered rocks: a case study from North-East Turkey. Earth Sciences, 19-44.
[104] Yanai J., Okada, T. and Yamada, H. (2012). Elemental composition of agricultural soils in Japan in relation to soil type, land use and region. Soil Science and Plant, 58: 1-10.
[105] Nesbitt, H. W. and Young, G. M. (1982). Early Proterozoic climates and plate motions inferred from major element chemistry of Lutites. Nature, 299: 715-717.
[106] Cocks, J. H. (1985) Cassava: New Potential for a Neglected Crop. West view, Boulder, USA. 191 pp.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Mgeta Steven Merumba, Balthazar Michael Msanya, Ernest Semu, Johnson Mashambo Semoka. (2020). Pedological Characterization and Suitability Assessment for Cassava Production in Bukoba, Missenyi and Biharamulo Districts, Tanzania. American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 8(4), 144-166. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20200804.18

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Mgeta Steven Merumba; Balthazar Michael Msanya; Ernest Semu; Johnson Mashambo Semoka. Pedological Characterization and Suitability Assessment for Cassava Production in Bukoba, Missenyi and Biharamulo Districts, Tanzania. Am. J. Agric. For. 2020, 8(4), 144-166. doi: 10.11648/j.ajaf.20200804.18

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Mgeta Steven Merumba, Balthazar Michael Msanya, Ernest Semu, Johnson Mashambo Semoka. Pedological Characterization and Suitability Assessment for Cassava Production in Bukoba, Missenyi and Biharamulo Districts, Tanzania. Am J Agric For. 2020;8(4):144-166. doi: 10.11648/j.ajaf.20200804.18

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ajaf.20200804.18,
      author = {Mgeta Steven Merumba and Balthazar Michael Msanya and Ernest Semu and Johnson Mashambo Semoka},
      title = {Pedological Characterization and Suitability Assessment for Cassava Production in Bukoba, Missenyi and Biharamulo Districts, Tanzania},
      journal = {American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry},
      volume = {8},
      number = {4},
      pages = {144-166},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ajaf.20200804.18},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20200804.18},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajaf.20200804.18},
      abstract = {A study was conducted in Bukoba, Missenyi and Biharamulo Districts, Tanzania with the objectives of characterizing, classifying and assessing the suitability of the study area for cassava production. A reconnaissance field survey using transect walks and auger observations was done in the study sites, which were geo-referenced in terms of international coordinates using Global Positioning System. Soil profiles representative of the study sites were excavated and named as MARU-P1, MISSE-P1 and BIHA-P1 for Bukoba, Missenyi and Biharamulo Districts, respectively. Soil profile description and data on the morphological features of the representative soils were collected according to the FAO Guidelines for Soil Description. Disturbed and undisturbed soil samples were collected from genetic soil horizons, processed and analyzed in a soil laboratory. Data on site characteristics, climate, soil morphological features and soil physical and chemical properties were used to classify the soils to the family level of the USDA Soil Taxonomy and to tier-2 of the FAO World Reference Base for Soil Resources. Soil suitability assessment of the experimental sites was done using a simple limitation method based on the FAO Framework for Land Evaluation. The results reveal that Pedons MARU-P1 and BIHA-P1 have similar morphological properties, which are different from pedon MISSE-P1. However, the studied pedons differ in their physical and chemical properties, implying differences in their use and management. The climate of the study sites is semi-humid with Udic soil moisture regime, which is generally favourable for crop production. According to the USDA Soil Taxonomy, pedons MARU-P1 and BIHA-P1 were classified as “Typic Kandiudults”. In addition, according to FAO World Reference Base for Soil Resources, pedons MARU-P1 and BIHA-P1 were classified as “Haplic Ferralic Acrisols” and “Chromic Ferralic Acrisols”, respectively. Pedon MISSE-P1 was classified as “Typic Endoaquolls” according to USDA Soil Taxonomy and as “Fluvic Gleyic Phaeozems” according to FAO World Reference Base for Soil Resources. Pedons MISSE-P1 and BIHA-P1 were both evaluated as marginally suitable while MARU-P1 pedon was evaluated as moderately suitable for cassava production due to soil fertility constraints. We recommended specific soil fertility management strategies in each studied site for optimum cassava yields.},
     year = {2020}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Pedological Characterization and Suitability Assessment for Cassava Production in Bukoba, Missenyi and Biharamulo Districts, Tanzania
    AU  - Mgeta Steven Merumba
    AU  - Balthazar Michael Msanya
    AU  - Ernest Semu
    AU  - Johnson Mashambo Semoka
    Y1  - 2020/07/28
    PY  - 2020
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20200804.18
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ajaf.20200804.18
    T2  - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry
    JF  - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry
    JO  - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry
    SP  - 144
    EP  - 166
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2330-8591
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20200804.18
    AB  - A study was conducted in Bukoba, Missenyi and Biharamulo Districts, Tanzania with the objectives of characterizing, classifying and assessing the suitability of the study area for cassava production. A reconnaissance field survey using transect walks and auger observations was done in the study sites, which were geo-referenced in terms of international coordinates using Global Positioning System. Soil profiles representative of the study sites were excavated and named as MARU-P1, MISSE-P1 and BIHA-P1 for Bukoba, Missenyi and Biharamulo Districts, respectively. Soil profile description and data on the morphological features of the representative soils were collected according to the FAO Guidelines for Soil Description. Disturbed and undisturbed soil samples were collected from genetic soil horizons, processed and analyzed in a soil laboratory. Data on site characteristics, climate, soil morphological features and soil physical and chemical properties were used to classify the soils to the family level of the USDA Soil Taxonomy and to tier-2 of the FAO World Reference Base for Soil Resources. Soil suitability assessment of the experimental sites was done using a simple limitation method based on the FAO Framework for Land Evaluation. The results reveal that Pedons MARU-P1 and BIHA-P1 have similar morphological properties, which are different from pedon MISSE-P1. However, the studied pedons differ in their physical and chemical properties, implying differences in their use and management. The climate of the study sites is semi-humid with Udic soil moisture regime, which is generally favourable for crop production. According to the USDA Soil Taxonomy, pedons MARU-P1 and BIHA-P1 were classified as “Typic Kandiudults”. In addition, according to FAO World Reference Base for Soil Resources, pedons MARU-P1 and BIHA-P1 were classified as “Haplic Ferralic Acrisols” and “Chromic Ferralic Acrisols”, respectively. Pedon MISSE-P1 was classified as “Typic Endoaquolls” according to USDA Soil Taxonomy and as “Fluvic Gleyic Phaeozems” according to FAO World Reference Base for Soil Resources. Pedons MISSE-P1 and BIHA-P1 were both evaluated as marginally suitable while MARU-P1 pedon was evaluated as moderately suitable for cassava production due to soil fertility constraints. We recommended specific soil fertility management strategies in each studied site for optimum cassava yields.
    VL  - 8
    IS  - 4
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Soil and Geological Sciences, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania

  • Department of Soil and Geological Sciences, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania

  • Department of Soil and Geological Sciences, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania

  • Department of Soil and Geological Sciences, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania

  • Sections