A field experiment was conducted at Tepi, southwest Ethiopia, from 2013 – 2017, to determine optimum plant population yield of component crops and land productivity in the coffee/korarima intercropping system. Test crops were Catimore-J21 variety for coffee and a local variety of korarima. The experiment consisted of five treatments arranged in a Randomized Complete Block Design with three replications. Data collected were statistically analyzed using SAS computer software. The productivity of the system was evaluated using a land equivalent ratio. Results showed that the coffee yield was significantly (p<0.05) influenced by intercropping, while the growth of the coffee tree did not significantly affect by intercropping. Whereas, the growth and yield of korarima plants were significantly (p<0.05) influenced by intercropping except for plant height, length, and girth of fruit capsule. Accordingly, the higher coffee yield advantages were found from sole plots when compared with intercropped coffee plots and followed by 2 to 1 coffee and korarima intercropping ratio. Similarly, the advanced yield of korarima was recorded from sole stands followed by 1 to 2 coffee and korarima intercropping ratio. The maximum land equivalent ratio was recorded at a planting pattern of 2 to 1 coffee and korarima intercropping ratio as compared to other treatments. Therefore, it could be concluded that intercropping of coffee with korarima is biologically and agronomically feasible, and the aforementioned treatment could be recommended for the study area. However, it is important to advise farmers in the area and similar agro-ecology to supplement irrigation water to the field especially during the dry spell period.
Published in | American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry (Volume 8, Issue 4) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ajaf.20200804.20 |
Page(s) | 175-180 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Coffee Yield, Intercropping, Land Equivalent Ratio, Korarima Yield
[1] | Abayneh, E. and Ashenafi, A. 2005. Soils of Tepi and Haru Agricultural Research Sub centers, Soil Survey and Land Evaluation Section. National Soil Research Center, Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. |
[2] | Addis, T., Endale, T., Alemseged, Y. and Teshome, M. 2015. Intercropping of Arabica Coffee (Coffea arabica L.) with Korerima (Aframomum corrorima (Braun) P.C.M. Jansen) in South Western Ethiopia. Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Healthcare, vol. 5: 21. |
[3] | Aggarwal, P., Garrity, D., Liboon, S. and Morris, R. 1992. Resource use and plant interaction in a rice and mung bean intercrop. Agronomy Journal, 84: 71-78. |
[4] | Anteneh, N. and Taye, K. 2015a. Intercropping of Arabica Coffee with Turmeric (Curcuma longa L.) and Ginger (Zingiber officinale Rose) at Teppi. Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Healthcare, 5 (7): 65-68. |
[5] | Anteneh, N., Taye, K. and Tesfaye, S. 2015b. Review of Arabica Coffee Management Research in Ethiopia. Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Healthcare, 5 (13): 235-258. |
[6] | Ashish, D., Ista, D., Vineet, K., Rajveer, S., Mohit, Y. et al., 2015. Potential role of maize-legume intercropping systems to improve soil fertility status under smallholder farming systems for sustainable agriculture in India. Int. J. Life Sci. Biotech. Pharm. Res, 4 (3): 145-157. |
[7] | Baumann, T., Bastiaans, L. and Kropff, M. 2002. Intercropping system optimization for yield, quality, and weed suppression combining mechanistic and descriptive models. Agronomy Journal, 94: 734-742. |
[8] | Beyenesh, Z., Mereseit, H. and Haile, T. 2017. Maize and Potato Intercropping: A technology to increase productivity and profitability in Tigray. Research article. Open Agriculture, 2: 411-416. |
[9] | Caballero, R., Goicoechea, E. and Hernaiz, P. 1995. Forage yield and quality of common vetch and oat sown at varying seed ratios and seeding rates of common vetch. Field Crops Research, 41: 135-140. |
[10] | Coste, R. 1992. Coffee: The plant and the product. Macmillan, London. 1992. |
[11] | Dereje, G. and Eshetu, A. 2011. Agro-ecologies of Ethiopia and major crops grown. A research report in collaboration with Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research (EIAR). Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. |
[12] | Eyob, S., Appelgren, M., Rohloff, J., Tsegaye, A. and Messele, G. 2007. Chemical composition and physical properties of essential oils from fresh plant parts of korarima (Aframomum corrorima (Braun) P.C.M. Jansen) cultivated in the highland of southern Ethiopia. Journal of Essential Oil Research, 19: 372-375. |
[13] | FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization), 1983. Fertilizer use under multiple cropping systems, FAO, Fertilizer and Plant Nutrition Bulletin No. 5, Rome. |
[14] | Francis, C. 1986. Distribution and importance of multiple cropping pp 1-17. In: C. A Francis C. A. (Ed). Multiple cropping. MacMillan Publishing Co., New York. |
[15] | Girma, H., Digafe, T. and Wondyfraw, T. 2008a. Yield and quality evaluation of ginger (Zingiber officinale Rosc) collections and introductions, In: Lemma D, Endale G, Hailemichael K, Zenebe W, Terefe B, Asfaw Z, Lakew B. (eds.) Ethiopian Horticultural Science Society (EHSS), Volume I. Proceedings of the first inaugural conference, 27-30 March 2006, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, pp. 215-220. |
[16] | Girma, H., Digafie, T., Wondyifraw, T. and Henok, Y. 2008b. Spices in coffee-based farming systems of Southwestern Ethiopia, In: Girma Adugna, Bayetta Bellachew, Tesfaye Shimber, Endale Taye and Taye Kufa. (eds.) Coffee diversity and knowledge, proceedings of a national workshop, four decades of coffee research and development in Ethiopia, 14-17 August, 2007; Addis Ababa (Ghion Hotel), Ethiopia pp. 431-442. |
[17] | Gomez, K. and Gomez, A. 1984. Statistical procedure for agricultural research. International Rice Research Institute, Wiley-Inter science. |
[18] | Haruna, I., Aliyu, L. and Maunde, S. 2013. Competitive behavior of groundnut in sesame or groundnut intercropping system under varying poultry manure rates and panting arrangement. Sustainable Agriculture Research, 2: 22-26. |
[19] | Jansen, R., Embden, J., van Gaastra, W. and Schouls, L. 2002. Identification of genes that are associated with DNA repeats in prokaryotes. Mol Microbiol, 43: 1565-1575. |
[20] | Jubaidur, R., Motiur, R., Zonayed-ull, A., Mukaddasul, I. and Fouzia, S. et al., 2015. Intermixed cropping of garden pea with onion. International Journal of Applied Research, 1 (2): 79-82. |
[21] | Murphy, H. 1968. A report on fertility status and other data on some soils of Ethiopia. |
[22] | Mithamo, M. W., 2014. Effect of Intercropping Coffee with Fruit Trees on Coffee Eco-Physiological and Soil Factors at Coffee Research Foundation in Ruiru, Kiambu County, Kenya. |
[23] | Olsen, S., Cole, C., Watanabe, F. and Dean, L. 1954. Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. USDA Circular, Washington, USA, 939: 1-19. |
[24] | SAS (Statistical Analysis System), 2008. SAS Institute. Cary, North Carolina, USA. |
[25] | Sullivan, P. 1998. Intercropping Principles and Production practices. Appropriate Technology Transfer for rural areas (ATTRA), Fayetteville. |
[26] | Reyes, T., Quiroz, R., Luukkanen, O. and de Mendiburu, F. 2009. Spice crops agroforestry systems in the East Usambara Mountains, Tanzania: growth analysis. Agrofor. Syst. 76: 513-523. |
[27] | Taye, K., Tesfaye, S. and Alemseged, Y. 2004. Intercropping of coffee with sweet orange at Jimma Research Center. Ethiopia. Journal of Café and Cacao, 5 (1-2): 17-21. |
[28] | Taye, K., Anteneh, N., Tesfaye, S., Edale, T. and Alemseged, Y. 2008. Intercropping of coffee with other crops. In: Girma Adugna, Bayetta Belachew, Tesfaye Shimber, Endale Taye and Taye Kufa (eds.) Coffee Diversity and Knowledge. Proceedings of the National Workshop Four Decades of Coffee Research and Development in Ethiopia. 14 -17 August 2007, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. |
[29] | Tekalign, T. 1991. Soil, plant, water, fertilizer, animal manure and compost analysis. Working Document No. 13. International Livestock Research Center for Africa, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. |
[30] | Willey, R. 1979. Intercropping, its importance and research needs. I, competition and yield advantages. Field Crop Abstracts 31: 1-10. |
[31] | Willey, R. 1985. Evaluation and presentation of intercropping advantages. Experimental Agriculture, 21: 119-133. |
[32] | Zhang, G., Yang, Z. and Dong, S. 2011. Interspecific competitiveness affects the total biomass yield in an alfalfa and corn intercropping system. Field Crops Res., 124 (1): 66-73. |
APA Style
Behailu Mekonnen, Shiferaw Temteme, Essubalew Getachew Seyum, Anteneh Netsere, Girma Hailemichael. (2020). Intercropping Coffee (Coffea arabica) and Korarima (Aframomum corrorima (Braun) P.C.M. Jansen) at Tepi, Southwest Ethiopia. American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 8(4), 175-180. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20200804.20
ACS Style
Behailu Mekonnen; Shiferaw Temteme; Essubalew Getachew Seyum; Anteneh Netsere; Girma Hailemichael. Intercropping Coffee (Coffea arabica) and Korarima (Aframomum corrorima (Braun) P.C.M. Jansen) at Tepi, Southwest Ethiopia. Am. J. Agric. For. 2020, 8(4), 175-180. doi: 10.11648/j.ajaf.20200804.20
AMA Style
Behailu Mekonnen, Shiferaw Temteme, Essubalew Getachew Seyum, Anteneh Netsere, Girma Hailemichael. Intercropping Coffee (Coffea arabica) and Korarima (Aframomum corrorima (Braun) P.C.M. Jansen) at Tepi, Southwest Ethiopia. Am J Agric For. 2020;8(4):175-180. doi: 10.11648/j.ajaf.20200804.20
@article{10.11648/j.ajaf.20200804.20, author = {Behailu Mekonnen and Shiferaw Temteme and Essubalew Getachew Seyum and Anteneh Netsere and Girma Hailemichael}, title = {Intercropping Coffee (Coffea arabica) and Korarima (Aframomum corrorima (Braun) P.C.M. Jansen) at Tepi, Southwest Ethiopia}, journal = {American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry}, volume = {8}, number = {4}, pages = {175-180}, doi = {10.11648/j.ajaf.20200804.20}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20200804.20}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajaf.20200804.20}, abstract = {A field experiment was conducted at Tepi, southwest Ethiopia, from 2013 – 2017, to determine optimum plant population yield of component crops and land productivity in the coffee/korarima intercropping system. Test crops were Catimore-J21 variety for coffee and a local variety of korarima. The experiment consisted of five treatments arranged in a Randomized Complete Block Design with three replications. Data collected were statistically analyzed using SAS computer software. The productivity of the system was evaluated using a land equivalent ratio. Results showed that the coffee yield was significantly (p<0.05) influenced by intercropping, while the growth of the coffee tree did not significantly affect by intercropping. Whereas, the growth and yield of korarima plants were significantly (p<0.05) influenced by intercropping except for plant height, length, and girth of fruit capsule. Accordingly, the higher coffee yield advantages were found from sole plots when compared with intercropped coffee plots and followed by 2 to 1 coffee and korarima intercropping ratio. Similarly, the advanced yield of korarima was recorded from sole stands followed by 1 to 2 coffee and korarima intercropping ratio. The maximum land equivalent ratio was recorded at a planting pattern of 2 to 1 coffee and korarima intercropping ratio as compared to other treatments. Therefore, it could be concluded that intercropping of coffee with korarima is biologically and agronomically feasible, and the aforementioned treatment could be recommended for the study area. However, it is important to advise farmers in the area and similar agro-ecology to supplement irrigation water to the field especially during the dry spell period.}, year = {2020} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Intercropping Coffee (Coffea arabica) and Korarima (Aframomum corrorima (Braun) P.C.M. Jansen) at Tepi, Southwest Ethiopia AU - Behailu Mekonnen AU - Shiferaw Temteme AU - Essubalew Getachew Seyum AU - Anteneh Netsere AU - Girma Hailemichael Y1 - 2020/08/13 PY - 2020 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20200804.20 DO - 10.11648/j.ajaf.20200804.20 T2 - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry JF - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry JO - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry SP - 175 EP - 180 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-8591 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20200804.20 AB - A field experiment was conducted at Tepi, southwest Ethiopia, from 2013 – 2017, to determine optimum plant population yield of component crops and land productivity in the coffee/korarima intercropping system. Test crops were Catimore-J21 variety for coffee and a local variety of korarima. The experiment consisted of five treatments arranged in a Randomized Complete Block Design with three replications. Data collected were statistically analyzed using SAS computer software. The productivity of the system was evaluated using a land equivalent ratio. Results showed that the coffee yield was significantly (p<0.05) influenced by intercropping, while the growth of the coffee tree did not significantly affect by intercropping. Whereas, the growth and yield of korarima plants were significantly (p<0.05) influenced by intercropping except for plant height, length, and girth of fruit capsule. Accordingly, the higher coffee yield advantages were found from sole plots when compared with intercropped coffee plots and followed by 2 to 1 coffee and korarima intercropping ratio. Similarly, the advanced yield of korarima was recorded from sole stands followed by 1 to 2 coffee and korarima intercropping ratio. The maximum land equivalent ratio was recorded at a planting pattern of 2 to 1 coffee and korarima intercropping ratio as compared to other treatments. Therefore, it could be concluded that intercropping of coffee with korarima is biologically and agronomically feasible, and the aforementioned treatment could be recommended for the study area. However, it is important to advise farmers in the area and similar agro-ecology to supplement irrigation water to the field especially during the dry spell period. VL - 8 IS - 4 ER -